Search

Immunization rates in pre-liver transplant patients have been historically below rates for immunocompetent patients. At Cleveland Clinic, an infectious diseases (ID) consult is required for all patients during the liver transplant evaluation and may beneficially impact vaccination rates. The goal of this study was to evaluate pre-transplant vaccination rates in pre-liver transplant candidates. This single-center, retrospective chart review included adults transplanted between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Prior to transplant, rates of vaccination and/or documented seropositivity were 35% for hepatitis B vaccine, 92% for hepatitis A vaccine, 57% for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 62% for pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, and 77% for influenza vaccine. Vaccination rates were higher than to previously reported. Rates were also higher for several vaccines compared to transplant candidates for other organs without ID consult. With ongoing ID consult requirements for liver transplant candidates, combined with standardization of vaccine recommendations via technology, and increased multi-disciplinary collaboration, vaccination rates should improve further.

Background There is a growing need for robust antimicrobial stewardship interventions in both ambulatory and solid organ transplant (SOT) populations. Methods A retrospective quasi-experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship intervention targeting cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in ambulatory SOT recipients. The intervention consisted of (a) real-time CMV DNA surveillance and result notification conducted by the pharmacist and (b) recommendations for the optimization of drug therapy provided at the time of result notification. The intervention period was compared to a pre-intervention period of usual care. Of 431 adult SOT recipients who had an initial quantifiable CMV viral load in the ambulatory setting, 185 received antiviral induction therapy and were included for analysis. Results Significantly fewer patients in the intervention period reached a CMV viral load >10 000 IU/mL immediately prior to treatment (10.6% vs 27.3%; P = 0.004), and a significantly greater proportion of patients in the intervention period achieved CMV eradication at 21 days (84.5% vs 71.7%; P = 0.038). Additional differences favoring the intervention period were antiviral initiation within 5 days of the first quantifiable CMV DNA (62.4% vs 55.0%; P = 0.02) and time-to-CMV eradication (25.5 vs 28.9 days; P = 0.003). Although not significant, there were also numerical reductions in CMV-related hospital admissions (11.9% vs 19.0%; P = 0.188) and CMV disease (5.9% vs 12.0%; P = 0.151) during the intervention period, as well as fewer episodes of CMV resistance at 1-year (2.3% vs 4.0%; P = 0.689). Conclusion Together, these findings suggest a potential role for pharmacist involvement in CMV surveillance and treatment optimization in ambulatory SOT recipients.