Search

OBJECTIVE Available evidence points to a role of cytochrome P450 (Cyp) drug biotransformation enzymes in central nervous system diseases, including epilepsy. Deviations in drug pharmacokinetic profiles may impact therapeutic outcomes. Here, we ask whether spontaneous recurrent seizure (SRS) activity is sufficient to modulate the expression of major Cyp enzymes in the liver and brain. METHODS Unilateral intrahippocampal (IH) kainic acid (KA) injections were used to elicit nonconvulsive status epilepticus (SE), epileptogenesis, and SRS, as monitored by video-electroencephalography. Intraperitoneal (IP) KA injection was used to trigger generalized tonic-clonic SE. KA-injected mice and sham controls were sacrificed at 24-72 hours and 1 week post-SE (IH or IP KA), and during the chronic stage (SRS; 6 weeks post-IH KA). Liver and brain tissues were processed for histology, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, or microsomal enzymatic assay. Cyp2e1, Cyp3a13, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), IBA1, xenobiotic nuclear receptors nr1i2 (PXR), nr1i3 (CAR) and nr3c1 (glucocorticoid receptor [GR]) expression was examined. Serum samples were obtained to assay corticosterone levels, a GR activator. RESULTS A significant increase of Cyp3a13 and Cyp2e1 transcript level and protein expression was found in the liver and hippocampi during SRS, as compared to control mice. In the ipsilateral hippocampus, Cyp2e1 and Cyp3a protein upregulation during SRS positively correlated to GFAP expression. GFAP+ , and not IBA1+ , cells colocalized with Cyp2e1 or Cyp3a expression. In the liver, a trend increase in Cyp3a microsomal activity was found during SRS as compared to control mice. The transcript levels of the Cyp upstream regulators GR, xenobiotic nr1i2, and nr1i3 receptors were unchanged at SRS. Corticosterone levels, a GR ligand, were increased in the blood post-SE. SIGNIFICANCE SRS modifies Cyp expression in the liver and the hippocampus. Nuclear receptors or inflammatory pathways are candidate mechanisms of Cyp regulation during seizures.

We report here the first association between vitamin D–resistant rickets, alopecia, and type 1 diabetes in a child with compound heterozygous mutations in the VDR gene. Transfection studies suggest dissociated effects of VDR gene mutations on the regulation of genes involved in vitamin D metabolism and dendritic cell maturation. Introduction: Whereas vitamin D may play a role in the immune tolerance process, no patient has been reported to associate hereditary vitamin D–resistant rickets (HVDRR) and an autoimmune disease, and no attempt has been made to delineate the outcome of mutations of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) on the transcription of genes controlling immune tolerance. Materials and Methods: The VDR gene was analyzed in a child with vitamin D–resistant rickets, total alopecia, and early childhood–onset type 1 diabetes. Patient's fibroblasts and COS-7 cells transfected with wildtype or mutant VDRs were studied for ligand-binding capacity, transactivation activity using two gene promoters [CYP-24, a classical 1,25(OH)2D3-responsive gene, and relB, a critical NF-κB component for regulation of dendritic cell differentiation], VDR-RXR heterodimers association to CYP 24 VDREs by gel mobility shift assays, and co-activator binding by Glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays. Results: Two novel compound heterozygous mutations (L263R and R391S) were identified in the VDR ligand-binding domain in this child. Both mutations significantly impaired VDR ligand-binding capacity but had dissociated effects on CYP-24 and RelB promoter responses to vitamin D. CYP 24 response binding to SRC-1 and RXR-heterodimer binding to CYP24 VDREs were abolished in L263R mutants but normal or partially altered in R391S mutants. In the opposite, RelB responses to vitamin D were close to normal in L263R mutants but abolished in R391S mutants. Conclusions: We report the first clinical association between HVDRR, total alopecia, and early childhood–onset type 1 diabetes. Mutations in the VDR ligand-binding domain may hamper the 1,25(OH)2D3–mediated relB responses, an effect that depends on the site of the VDR mutation and cannot be anticipated from VDR ligand-binding ability or CYP-24 response. Based on these results, we propose to survey the immune function in patients with HVDRR, including those with moderate features of rickets.

Although CYP3A induction by dexamethasone has been extensively documented, its mechanism is still unclear because both the role of the glucocorticoid receptor and the ability of dexamethasone to activate the human pregnane X receptor have been questioned. In an attempt to resolve this problem, we investigated the response of CYP3A4 to dexamethasone (10 nm-100 microm) in primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 cells, using a variety of methods: kinetic analysis of CYP3A4 and tyrosine aminotransferase expression, effects of RU486 and cycloheximide, ligand binding assay, cotransfection of HepG2 cells with CYP3A4 reporter gene constructs and vectors expressing the glucocorticoid receptor, pregnane X receptor or constitutively activated receptor. In contrast to rifampicin (monophasic induction), dexamethasone produces a biphasic induction of CYP3A4 mRNA consisting of a low-dexamethasone component (nmol concentrations) of low amplitude (factor of 3-4) followed by a high-dexamethasone component (supramicromolar concentrations) of high amplitude (factor of 15-30). We show that the low-dexamethasone component results from the glucocorticoid receptor-mediated expression of pregnane X receptor and/or constitutively activated receptor which, in turn, are able to transactivate CYP3A4 in a xenobiotic-independent manner. At supramicromolar concentrations (>10 microm), dexamethasone binds to and activates pregnane X receptor thus producing the high-dexamethasone component of CYP3A4 induction. We conclude that, in contrast to the other xenobiotic inducers of CYP3A4, glucocorticoids play a dual role in CYP3A4 expression, first by controlling the expression of PXR and CAR under physiological conditions (submicromolar concentrations) through the classical glucocorticoid receptor pathway, and second by activating the pregnane X receptor under bolus or stress conditions (supramicromolar concentrations).