Search

Over the last decade, developments in molecular profiling have radically altered the diagnosis, classification, and management of numerous cancer types, with primary brain tumors being no exception. Although historically brain tumors have been classified based on their morphological characteristics, recent advances have allowed refinement of tumor classification based on molecular alterations. This shift toward molecular classification of primary brain tumors is reflected in the 2021 5

H3F3A mutations are seen in ∼30% of pediatric glioblastoma (GBMs) and involve either the lysine residue at position 27 (K27M) or glycine at position 34 (G34R/V). Sixteen genes encode histone H3, each variant differing in only a few amino acids. Therefore, how mutations in a single H3 gene contribute to carcinogenesis is unknown. H3F3A K27M mutations are predicted to alter methylation of H3K27. H3K27me3 is a repressive mark critical to stem cell maintenance and is mediated by EZH2, a member of the polycomb-group (PcG) family. We evaluated H3K27me3 and EZH2 expression using immunohistochemistry in 76 pediatric brain tumors. H3K27me3 was lowered/absent in tumor cells but preserved in endothelial cells and infiltrating lymphocytes in six out of 20 GBMs. H3K27me3 showed strong immunoreactivity in all other tumor subtypes. Sequencing of GBMs showed H3F3A K27M mutations in all six cases with lowered/absent H3K27me3. EZH2 expression was high in GBMs, but absent/focal in other tumors. However, no significant differences in EZH2 expression were observed between H3F3A K27M mutant and wild type GBMs, suggesting that EZH2 mediated trimethylation of H3K27 is inhibited in GBM harboring K27M mutations. Our results indicate that H3F3A K27M mutant GBMs show decreased H3K27me3 that may be of both diagnostic and biological relevance.

We report 10 cases of a non-neurocytic, purely neuronal tumor affecting adults. Situated in the cerebral hemispheres, with 7 of 10 confined to the temporal lobes, most presented with seizures as their principal clinical manifestations. On magnetic resosnance imaging (MRI), the tumors generally appeared solid and non-contrast enhancing with minimal diffuse infiltration, edema, or mass effect. Six examples demonstrated internal nodularity. Microscopically, the tumor cells were largely distributed into discrete and coalescent nodules exhibiting varying degrees of matrix vacuolization, principally within the deep cortical ribbon and superficial subcortical white matter. Populating elements ranged from morphologically ambiguous to recognizably neuronal, with only two cases manifesting overt ganglion cell cytology. In all cases, tumor cells exhibited widespread nuclear immunolabeling for the HuC/HuD neuronal antigens, although expression of other neuronal markers, including synaptophysin, neurofilament and chromogranin was variable to absent. Tumor cells also failed to express GFAP, p53, IDH1 R132H, or CD34, although CD34-labeling ramified neural elements were present in the adjoining cortex of seven cases. Molecular analysis in a subset of cases failed to reveal DNA copy number abnormalities or BRAF V600E mutation. Follow-up data indicate that this unusual neuronal lesion behaves in benign, World Health Organization (WHO) grade I fashion and is amenable to surgical control.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Brain metastases from prostate cancer are uncommon and their imaging appearance has not been well defined. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence, MRI characteristics, and prognosis of parenchymal brain metastases originating in prostate cancer. METHODS We retrospectively identified 21 patients with prostate cancer and evidence of brain metastases from 2000 to 2010. We reviewed the initial brain MRI scans and characterized the lesions according to location and appearance on MRI, while also determining patient demography, staging, and survival. RESULTS The incidence of brain metastasis from prostate cancer was .16%. At the time of brain metastasis detection, 95% of the patients had concurrent osseous metastases, 86% lymph node metastases, and 76% liver and/or lung metastases. Brain metastases were multifocal in 71% of patients, hemorrhagic in 33%, diffusion restricted in 19%, and partially cystic/necrotic in 19%. The median overall survival after brain metastasis detection was 2.8 months. CONCLUSIONS Brain metastasis from prostate cancer remains a rare phenomenon that most frequently occurs in the setting of widely disseminated bone and soft tissue disease. Patients with nonadenocarcinoma pathology are more likely to develop brain metastases. The MRI appearance is highly variable and prognosis is poor.

Recent improvements in the understanding of brain tumor biology have opened the door to a number of rational therapeutic strategies targeting distinct oncogenic pathways. The successful translation of such "designer drugs" to clinical application depends heavily on effective and expeditious screening methods in relevant disease models. By recapitulating both the underlying genetics and the characteristic tumor-stroma microenvironment of brain cancer, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) may offer distinct advantages over cell culture and xenograft systems in the preclinical testing of promising therapies. This review focuses on recently developed GEMMs for both glioma and medulloblastoma, and discusses their potential use in preclinical trials. Examples showcasing the use of GEMMs in the testing of molecularly targeted therapeutics are given, and relevant topics, such as stem cell biology, in vivo imaging technology and radiotherapy, are also addressed.

Extraneural metastases of ependymoma are rare, and have been reported in the lungs, lymph nodes, pleura, mediastinum, liver, diaphragmatic muscle, and bone. We report a case of anaplastic ependymoma with distant metastases to the vertebral bones, lungs, liver, and lymph nodes following treatment with bevacizumab. Recent research has hypothesized that angiogenic tumors may develop means of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies, and some evidence suggests potential for antiangiogenic therapies to promote additional means for cancer spread. Nevertheless, antiangiogenic therapies continue to demonstrate potential as potent therapies for the treatment of many cancers, and should continue to be researched for future uses.

Background The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is aberrantly activated in many pediatric solid tumors including gliomas and medulloblastomas. Preclinical data in a pediatric glioma model demonstrated that the combination of perifosine (AKT inhibitor) and temsirolimus (mTOR inhibitor) is more potent at inhibiting the axis than either agent alone. We conducted this study to assess pharmacokinetics and identify the maximum tolerated dose for the combination. Procedure We performed a standard 3+3 phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study in patients with recurrent/refractory pediatric solid tumors. Four dose levels of perifosine (25–75 mg/m2/day) and temsirolimus (25–75 mg/m2 IV weekly) were investigated. Results Twenty-three patients (median age 8.5 years) with brain tumors (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma [DIPG] n = 8, high-grade glioma n = 6, medulloblastoma n = 2, ependymoma n = 1), neuroblastoma (n = 4), or rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2) were treated. The combination was generally well tolerated and no dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities (at least possibly related) were thrombocytopenia (38.1%), neutropenia (23.8%), lymphopenia (23.8%), and hypercholesterolemia (19.0%). Pharmacokinetic findings for temsirolimus were similar to those observed in the temsirolimus single-agent phase II pediatric study and pharmacokinetic findings for perifosine were similar to those in adults. Stable disease was seen in 9 of 11 subjects with DIPG or high-grade glioma; no partial or complete responses were achieved. Conclusions The combination of these AKT and mTOR inhibitors was safe and feasible in patients with recurrent/refractory pediatric solid tumors.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is thought by many to result from the accumulation of the neurotoxic amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in brain parenchyma. The process by which Aβ is proteolytically derived from the larger amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been the focus of much attention in the AD research field over the past decade. Recently, several of the proteins directly involved in the generation of Aβ have been identified and characterized providing a number of viable therapeutic targets for the treatment of AD. However, the cellular mechanisms by which these proteins interact in the proteolytic processing of APP have not been well defined, nor are they readily apparent when one considers what is known about the intracellular localization and trafficking of the various participants. This article will review the underlying cell biology of Aβ production and discuss the mechanistic options for APP processing given the current knowledge of the proteases involved.