1. The impact of coronary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention upon donor vessel fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: Implications for physiology-guided PCI in patients with CTO
- Author
-
Swamy Gedela, Grigoris V. Karamasis, Paul A. Kelly, Kare H. Tang, Thomas R. Keeble, Jufen Zhang, James Hampton-Till, Firas Al-Janabi, Jason Dungu, Shah Mohdnazri, Justin E. Davies, Rasha Al-Lamee, Christopher Cook, and John R. Davies
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac Catheterization ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Clinical Decision-Making ,Collateral Circulation ,Physiology ,Fractional flow reserve ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Revascularization ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Angina, Stable ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Instantaneous wave-free ratio ,Aged ,business.industry ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,Drug-Eluting Stents ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ,Treatment Outcome ,Coronary Occlusion ,Coronary occlusion ,Right coronary artery ,Chronic Disease ,Conventional PCI ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Objective: \ud To investigate the immediate and short term impact of right coronary artery (RCA) chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) upon collateral donor vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave‐free ratio (iFR).\ud \ud Background: \ud CTO PCI influences collateral donor vessel physiology, making the indication and/or timing of donor vessel revascularization difficult to determine.\ud \ud Methods: \ud In patients with RCA CTO, FFR, iFR, and collateral function index (FFRcoll) were measured in LAD and LCx pre‐CTO PCI, immediately post and at 4 month follow‐up.\ud \ud Results: \ud 34 patients underwent successful PCI. In the predominant donor vessel immediately post PCI, FFR, and FFRcoll did not change (0.76 ± 0.12 to 0.75 ± 0.13, P = 0.267 and 0.31 ± 0.10 vs. 0.34 ± 0.11, P = 0.078), but iFR increased significantly (0.86 ± 0.10 to 0.88 ± 0.10, P = 0.012). At follow‐up, there was a significant increase in predominant donor FFR and iFR (0.76 ± 0.12 to 0.79 ± 0.11, P = 0.047 and 0.86 ± 0.10 to 0.90 ± 0.07, P = 0.003), accompanied by a significant reduction in FFRcoll (0.31 ± 0.10 to 0.18 ± 0.07 P
- Published
- 2018