Search

Abstract DLCO/NO, the combined single‐breath measurement of the diffusing capacity to carbon monoxide (DLCO) and nitric oxide (DLNO) measured either during exercise or in the resting supine position may be a useful physiological measure of alveolar–capillary reserve. In the present study, we investigated the between‐day test–retest reliability of DLCO/NO‐based metrics. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 males, 10 females; mean age 25 (SD 2) years) were randomized to repeated DLCO/NO measurements during upright rest followed by either exercise (n = 11) or resting in the supine position (n = 9). The measurements were repeated within 7 days. The smallest real difference (SRD), defined as the 95% confidence limit of the standard error of measurement (SEM), the coefficient of variance (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess test–retest reliability. SRD for DLNO was higher during upright rest (5.4 (95% CI: 4.1, 7.5) mmol/(min kPa)) than during exercise (2.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 3.9) mmol/(min kPa)) and in the supine position (3.0 (95% CI: 2.1, 4.8) mmol/(min kPa)). SRD for DLCOc was similar between conditions. CV values for DLNO were slightly lower than for DLCOc both during exercise (1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.7) vs. 3.8 (95% CI: 3.2, 4.3)%) and in the supine position (2.2 (95% CI: 1.8, 2.5) vs. 4.8 (95% CI: 3.8, 5.4)%). DLNO increased by 12.3 (95% CI: 11.1, 13.4) and DLCOc by 3.3 (95% CI: 2.9, 3.7) mmol/(min kPa) from upright rest to exercise. The DLCO/NO technique provides reliable indices of alveolar–capillary reserve, both during exercise and in the supine position.

Background: Desmoid tumors can cause morbidity due to local invasion, potentially being fatal when fast growth compromises vital structures. In this context, a timely treatment response is required. This study aims to compare the activity of sorafenib and anthracycline-containing regimens during the first year of treatment., Methods: The authors conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of desmoid tumor patients treated with either sorafenib or an anthracycline-containing regimen over 1 year. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events., Results: From 2005 to 2022, 80 patients received sorafenib and 51 received an anthracycline-containing regimen with similar baseline characteristics. The 1-year ORR was 37% for anthracycline and 13% for sorafenib (p = .016). Median best response was -9% (range, -73 to 51) for anthracycline and -4% (range, -69 to 126) for sorafenib. Median TTR was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.8) for anthracycline and 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.3-11.1) for sorafenib (p = .2). One-year PFS was 73% (95% CI, 60-86) for anthracycline and 59% (95% CI, 47-71) for sorafenib (p = .3). Common grade 1-2 adverse events for sorafenib were hand-foot syndrome (40%), diarrhea (25%), and fatigue (22%); for anthracycline, they were nausea (31%), fatigue (16%), and rash (14%). Grade 3 events were higher in the anthracycline group, 27% versus 14% (p < .05)., Conclusion: Anthracycline-based therapy provided a greater 1-year response rate than sorafenib but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events. Higher-risk desmoid tumors, which need a more timely response, might benefit from anthracycline-based therapies, whereas average-risk tumors could benefit from sorafenib., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)