1. INEXAS: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of On‐demand Inhaled Interferon Beta‐1a in Severe Asthmatics
- Author
-
Tim Harrison, Karin Karlsson, Anna Malmgren, Malin Aurell, Marita Olsson, Malin Fagerås, Richard Marsden, Phillip Monk, Anders Cavallin, Christopher McCrae, Jonathan Paraskos, Carla A. Da Silva, Per Gustafson, and Cecilia Wingren
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Exacerbation ,IL‐18 ,Immunology ,Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ,Placebo ,Antiviral Agents ,Severity of Illness Index ,law.invention ,IFN response ,03 medical and health sciences ,exacerbation ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Administration, Inhalation ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Immunology and Allergy ,Respiratory Tract Infections ,Asthma ,Inhalation ,business.industry ,Interferon beta-1a ,interferon ,Middle Aged ,asthma ,medicine.disease ,viral URTI ,030104 developmental biology ,030228 respiratory system ,Asthma Control Questionnaire ,Asthma and Rhinitis ,Disease Progression ,Cytokines ,Female ,Original Article ,eosinophils ,ORIGINAL ARTICLES ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are important triggers for asthma exacerbations. We hypothesized that inhalation of the anti‐viral cytokine, interferon (IFN)‐β, during URTI, could prevent these exacerbations. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of on‐demand inhaled IFN‐β1a (AZD9412) to prevent severe asthma exacerbations following symptomatic URTI. Methods This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in which patients with severe asthma (GINA 4‐5; n = 121) reporting URTI symptoms were randomized to 14 days of once‐daily nebulized AZD9412 or placebo. The primary endpoint was severe exacerbations during treatment. Secondary endpoints included 6‐item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ‐6) and lung function. Exploratory biomarkers included IFN‐response markers in serum and sputum, blood leucocyte counts and serum inflammatory cytokines. Results Following a pre‐planned interim analysis, the trial was terminated early due to an unexpectedly low exacerbation rate. Asthma worsenings were generally mild and tended to peak at randomization, possibly contributing to the lack of benefit of AZD9412 on other asthma endpoints. Numerically, AZD9412 did not reduce severe exacerbation rate, ACQ‐6, asthma symptom scores or reliever medication use. AZD9412 improved lung function (morning peak expiratory flow; mPEF) by 19.7 L/min. Exploratory post hoc analyses indicated a greater mPEF improvement by AZD9412 in patients with high blood eosinophils (>0.3 × 109/L) at screening and low serum interleukin‐18 relative change at pre‐treatment baseline. Pharmacodynamic effect of AZD9412 was confirmed using IFN‐response markers. Conclusions & Clinical Relevance Colds did not have the impact on asthma patients that was expected and, due to the low exacerbation rate, the trial was stopped early. On‐demand AZD9412 treatment did not numerically reduce the number of exacerbations, but did attenuate URTI‐induced worsening of mPEF. Severe asthma patients with high blood eosinophils or low serum interleukin‐18 response are potential subgroups for further investigation of inhaled IFN‐β1a.
- Published
- 2020