Search

Your search keyword '"Holvoet P"' showing total 13 results
Start Over Author "Holvoet P" Publisher wiley
13 results on '"Holvoet P"'

2. Abstracts from the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2016

Author

Guillaume Pouessel, Claire Claverie, Julien Labreuche, Jean-Marie Renaudin, Aimée Dorkenoo, Mireille Eb, Anne Moneret-Vautrin, Antoine Deschildre, Stephane Leteurtre, Linus Grabenhenrich, Margitta Worm, Sabine Dölle, Kathrin Scherer, Isidor Hutteger, Morten Christensen, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Charlotte Mortz, Esben Eller, Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer, Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Jenny Badas, Alice Coimbra, Dikla Pivko Levy, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Ayelet Rimon, Shira Benor, Nicolette J. T. Arends, Nikki Edelbroek, Hans de Groot, Joyce A. M. Emons, H. Kim A. Brand, Dirk Verhoeven, Leonieke N. van Veen, Nicolette W. de Jong, Geunwoong Noh, Eun Ha Jang, Mariona Pascal, Olga Dominguez, Mònica Piquer, Montserrat Alvaro, Rosa Jimenez-Feijoo, Jaime Lozano, Adriana Machinena, Maria del Mar Folqué, Maria Teresa Giner, Ana María Plaza, Paul Turner, Nandinee Patel, Marta Vazquez-Ortiz, Sarah Lindsley, Lucy Walker, Simon Rosenberg, Adriano Mari, Claudia Alessandri, Ivana Giangrieco, Lisa Tuppo, Chiara Rafaiani, Georg Mitterer, Michela Ciancamerla, Rosetta Ferrara, Maria Livia Bernardi, Danila Zennaro, Maurizio Tamburrini, Maria Antonetta Ciardiello, Christian Harwanegg, Antonio Fernandez, Regina Selb, Philippe Egenmann, Michelle Epstein, Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Frits Koning, Martinus Lovik, E. N. Clare Mills, Javier Moreno, Henk van Loveren, Jean-Michel Wal, Susanne Diesner, Cornelia Bergmayr, Barbara Pfitzner, Vera Elisabeth Assmann, Philipp Starkl, David Endesfelder, Thomas Eiwegger, Zsolt Szepfalusi, Heinz Fehrenbach, Erika Jensen-Jarolim, Anton Hartmann, Isabella Pali-Schöll, Eva Untersmayr, Soren Wille, Peter Meyer, Caroline Klingebiel, Jonas Lidholm, Angelica Ehrenberg, Jonas Östling, Isabelle Cleach, Jean-Louis Mège, Joana Vitte, Roberta Aina, Pawel Dubiela, Sabine Pfeifer, Merima Bublin, Christian Radauer, Piotr Humeniuk, Stefan Kabasser, Riccardo Asero, Gador Bogas, Francisca Gomez, Paloma Campo, Maria Salas, Inmaculada Doña, Esther Barrionuevo, Maria Auxiliadora Guerrero, Cristobalina Mayorga, Ana Prieto, Domingo Barber, Maria Jose Torres, Annette Jamin, Andrea Wangorsch, Barbara Ballmer, Stefan Vieths, Stephan Scheurer, Danijela Apostolovic, Jelena Mihailovic, Maja Krstic, Maria Starkhammar, Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic, Carl Hamsten, Marianne van Hage, Francine C. van Erp, Edward F. Knol, Hannah M. Kansen, Bo Pontoppidan, Yolanda Meijer, Cornelis K. van der Ent, André C. Knulst, Rebekah Sayers, Helen Brown, Adnan Custovic, Angela Simpson, Claire Mills, Juliane Schulz, Network for Online Registration of Anaphylaxis (NORA), Jaap Akkerdaas, Muriel Totis, Annabelle Capt, Corinne Herouet-Guicheney, Ronald van Ree, Tushar Banerjee, Antima Banerjee, Mathilde Claude, Grégory Bouchaud, Roberta Lupi, Laure Castan, Olivier Tranquet, Sandra Denery-Papini, Marie Bodinier, Chantal Brossard, Rosella De Poi, Elisa Gritti, Emiliano De Dominicis, Bert Popping, Patrizia Polverino de Laureto, Kati Palosuo, Anna Kaarina Kukkonen, Anna Pelkonen, Mika Mäkelä, Nanju Alice Lee, Johanna Rost, Sridevi Muralidharan, Dianne Campbell, Sam Mehr, Catherine Nock, Joseph Baumert, Steve Taylor, Carla Mastrorilli, Salvatore Tripodi, Carlo Caffarelli, Serena Perna, Andrea Di Rienzo Businco, Ifigenia Sfika, Arianna Dondi, Annamaria Bianchi, Carlotta Povesi Dascola, Giampaolo Ricci, Francesca Cipriani, Nunzia Maiello, Michele Miraglia del Giudice, Tullio Frediani, Simone Frediani, Francesco Macrì, Chiara Pistoletti, Iride Dello Iacono, Maria Francesca Patria, Elena Varin, Diego Peroni, Pasquale Comberiati, Loredana Chini, Viviana Moschese, Sandra Lucarelli, Roberto Bernardini, Giuseppe Pingitore, Umberto Pelosi, Roberta Olcese, Matteo Moretti, Anastasia Cirisano, Diego Faggian, Alessandro Travaglini, Mario Plebani, Maria Carmen Verga, Mauro Calvani, Paolo Giordani, Paolo Maria Matricardi, Noe Ontiveros, Francisco Cabrera-Chavez, Julie Galand, Etienne Beaudouin, The Anaphylaxis Working Group of the French Allergology SocietyThe Anaphylaxis Working Group of the French Allergology Society, Florence Pineau, Shinobu Sakai, Kayoko Matsunaga, Reiko Teshima, Colette Larré, Sandra Denery, Sebastian Tschirner, Valérie Trendelenburg, Gabriele Schulz, Bodo Niggemann, Kirsten Beyer, Youcef Bouferkas, Younes Belabbas, Djamel Saidi, Omar Kheroua, Kamel Eddine El Mecherfi, Malika Guendouz, Abir Haddi, Hanane Kaddouri, Luis Amaral, Ana Pereira, Susana Rodrigues, Mareen Datema, Laurian Jongejan, Michael Clausen, Andre Knulst, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Marek Kowalski, Frédéric de Blay, Aeilko Zwinderman, Karin Hoffman-Sommergruber, Barbara Ballmer-Weber, Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas, Shan Deng, Jia Yin, Charlotte Eisenmann, Maria Nassiri, Rabea Reinert, Johanna P. M. van der Valk, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Yvonne Vergouwe, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Marit Reitsma, Harry J. Wichers, Huub F. J. Savelkoul, Berber Vlieg-Boerstra, Anthony E. J. Dubois, Fabrícia Carolino, Ana Rodolfo, Josefina Cernadas, Dasha Roa-Medellín, Ana Rodriguez-Fernandez, Joaquín Navarro, Vicente Albendiz, María Luisa Baeza, Sonsoles Intente-Herrero, Andrea Mikkelsen, Kirsten Mehlig, Lauren Lissner, Linda Verrill, Stefano Luccioli, Jolanda van Bilsen, Frieke Kuper, André Wolterbeek, Tanja Rouhani Rankouhi, Lars Verschuren, Hilde Cnossen, Prescilla Jeurink, Johan Garssen, Léon Knippels, Jossie Garthoff, Geert Houben, Winfried Leeman, M. Eleonore Pettersson, Afke M. M. Schins, Gerard H. Koppelman, Boudewjin J. Kollen, Svitlana Zubchenko, Sarah Kuntz, Pablo Mérida, Montserrat Álvaro, Monica Piquer, Carmen Riggioni, Juan Heber Castellanos, Rosa Jimenez, Melanie Cap, Elodie Drumez, Stéphanie Lejeune, Caroline Thumerelle, Clémence Mordacq, Véronique Nève, Sonia Ricò, Margherita Varini, Rita Nocerino, Linda Cosenza, Antonio Amoroso, Margherita Di Costanzo, Carmen Di Scala, Giorgio Bedogni, Roberto Berni Canani, Paul J. Turner, Paloma Poza-Guedes, Ruperto González-Pérez, Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín, Victor Matheu-Delgado, Erik Wambre, Anne-Sofie Ballegaard, Charlotte Madsen, Juliane Gregersen, Katrine Lindholm Bøgh, Philippe Aubert, Michel Neunlist, Antoine Magnan, Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo, Alba Pablos-Tanarro, Leticia Pérez-Rodríguez, Elena Molina, Rosina López-Fandiño, Akila Rekima, Patricia Macchiaverni, Mathilde Turfkruyer, Sebastien Holvoet, Lénaïck Dupuis, Nour Baiz, Isabella Annesi-Maesano, Annick Mercenier, Sophie Nutten, Valérie Verhasselt, Ines Mrakovcic-Sutic, Srdan Banac, Ivana Sutic, Zdenka Baricev-Novakovic, Ingrid Sutic, Valentino Pavisic, Rosa Muñoz-Cano, Teodoríkez Jiménez-Rodríguez, Daniel Corbacho, Jordi Roca-Ferrer, Joan Bartra, Aleksandar Bulog, Vladimir Micovic, Lidia Markiewicz, Agata Szymkiewicz, Anna Szyc, Barbara Wróblewska, Bryan M. Harvey, Lucien F. Harthoorn, A. Wesley Burks, Georgios Rentzos, Anna-Lena Bramstång Björk, Ulf Bengtsson, Colin Barber, Chrystyna Kalicinsky, Christine Breynaert, Lieve Coorevits, Cornelia Jansen, Erna Van Hoeyveld, Kristin Verbeke, Anne-Marie Kochuyt, Rik Schrijvers, Diana Deleanu, Adriana Muntean, Maria Konstantakopoulou, Maria Pasioti, Anastasia Papadopoulou, Anna Iliopoulou, Nikolaos Mikos, Evangelia Kompoti, Eunice Dias de Castro, Borja Bartalomé, Kok Loong Ue, Elizabeth Griffiths, Stephen Till, Kate Grimshaw, Graham Roberts, Anna Selby, Indre Butiene, Jose Ignacio Larco, Ruta Dubakiene, Ana Fiandor, Alessandro Fiocchi, Nikos Papadopoulos, Sigurveig Sigurdardottir, Aline Sprikkelman, Anne-Fleur Schoemaker, Paraskevi Xepapadaki, Thomas Keil, Zizi Cojocariu, Beatriz Secades Barbado, Vasti Iancu, Esozia Arroabarren, Marta Goñi Esarte, Miren Arteaga, Mayra Coutinho Andrade, Denise Borges, Jorge Kalil, Pedro Giavina Bianchi, Rosana Camara Agondi, Rinkesh Kumar Gupta, Akanksha Sharma, Kriti Gupta, Mukul Das, Premendra Dwivedi, Rusudan Karseladze, Liana Jorjoliani, Lali Saginadze, Mariam Tskhakaia, Katia Basello, Gabriele Piuri, Attilio Francesco Speciani, Michela Carola Speciani, Carla Camerotto, Francesco Zinno, Olga Pakholchuk, Svitlana Nedelska, Stefano Pattini, Maria Teresa Costantino, Silvia Peveri, Danilo Villalta, Eleonora Savi, Andrea Costanzi, Vera A. Revyakina, Marina A. Kiseleva, Elena D. Kuvshinova, Inna A. Larkova, Anton A. Shekhetov, Diana Silva, André Moreira, José Plácido, Hanneke van der Kleij, Esther van Twuijver, Robbert Sutorius, Pieter-Jan de Kam, Jenny van Odijk, Helen Lindqvist, Elin Lustig, Amyra Ali Azamar Jácome, Karla Leversia Borjas Aguilar, Miguel García Domínguez, David Alejandro Mendoza Hernández, Cristiano Caruso, Cono Casale, Gian Lodovico Rapaccini, Antonino Romano, Italo De Vitis, Renata R. Cocco, Carolina Aranda, Marcia C. Mallozi, Jackeline F. Motta, Lilian Moraes, Antonio Pastorino, Nelson Rosario, Ekaterini Goudouris, Arnaldo Porto, Neusa F. Wandalsen, Emanuel Sarinho, Flavio Sano, Dirceu Solé, Constantinos Pitsios, Maria Petrodimopoulou, Ekaterini Papadopoulou, Maria Passioti, Meropi Kontogianni, Nino Adamia, Ekaterina Khaleva, Ana Prieto del Prado, George Du Toit, Edyta Krzych, Urszula Samolinska-Zawisza, Konrad Furmanczyk, Aneta Tomaszewska, Filip Raciborski, Agnieszka Lipiec, Piotr Samel-Kowalik, Artur Walkiewicz, Jacek Borowicz, Boleslaw Samolinski, Aimee Lou Nano, Marysia Recto, Maria Luisa Somoza, Natalia Blanca López, Diana Pérez Alzate, Francisco Javier Ruano, Maria Isabel Garcimartín, Elisa Haroun, Maria Vázquez de la Torre, Antonia Rojas, Montserrat López Onieva, Gabriela Canto, Alexandra Rodrigues, Andreia Forno, António Jorge Cabral, Rute Gonçalves, Ilya Vorozhko, Tatyana Sentsova, Olga Chernyak, Svetlana Denisova, Lidia Ilènko, Valery Muhortnich, Caroline Zimmermann, Alexander Rohrbach, Faisal R. Bakhsh, Kollen Boudewijn, Anne-Marie Oomkes-Pilon, Dorien Van Ginkle, Mira Šilar, Anja Jeverica, Tina Vesel, Tadej Avčin, Peter Korošec, Johanna van der Valk, Irene Berends, Nicolette Arends, Maurits van Maaren, Harry Wichers, Joyce Emons, Anthony Dubois, Nicolette de Jong, Oksana Matsyura, Lesya Besh, Chung-Hsiung Huang, Tong-Rong Jan, Gary Stiefel, Jean Tratt, Kerrie Kirk, Fabricia Carolino, Stefania Arasi, Lucia Caminiti, Giuseppe Crisafulli, Chiara Fiamingo, Jlenia Fresta, Giovanni Pajno, Ben Remington, Astrid Kruizinga, W. Marty Blom, Joost Westerhout, Sabina Bijlsma, Joe Baumert, Mark Blankestijn, Henny Otten, Rob Klemans, Anouska D. Michelsen-Huisman, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, Astrid G. Kruizinga, Astrid Versluis, Gert van Duijn, H. Mary-Lene de Zeeuw-Brouwer, Jacqueline J. M. Castenmiller, Hub P. J. M. Noteborn, Geert F. Houben, Kristian Bravin, David Luyt, Bushra Javed, Phil Couch, Christopher Munro, Phil Padfield, Matt Sperrin, Aideen Byrne, Lizalet Oosthuizen, Carina Kelleher, Fiona Ward, Niamh Brosnan, Graham King, Eva Corbet, Josué Alejandro Huertas Guzmán, Montserrat Bosque García, Oscar Asensio, Laura Valdesoiro Navarrete, Helena Larramona, Xavier Domingo Miró, Katarzyna Pyrz, Moira Austin, Yanne Boloh, Philip Couch, Deirdre Galloway, Pilar Hernandez, Jonathan O’B. Hourihane, Fiona Kenna, Barbara Majkowska-Wojciechowska, Lynne Regent, Marina Themisb, Sabine Schnadt, Aida Semic-Jusufagic, Audrey Dunn Galvin, Tiina Kauppila, Mikael Kuitunen, Nikolaos A. Kitsioulis, Nikolaos Douladiris, Sofia Kostoudi, Ioanna Manolaraki, Dimitris Mitsias, Emmanouil Manousakis, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Rebecca Knibb, Jennifer Hammond, Richard Cooke, Jaakko Yrjänä, Anna-Maija Hanni, Päivi Vähäsarja, Oona Mustonen, Teija Dunder, Petri Kulmala, Eva Lasa, Carmen D’Amelio, Sara Martínez, Alejandro Joral, Gabriel Gastaminza, Maria Jose Goikoetxea, David C. A. Candy, Marleen T. J. Van Ampting, Manon M. Oude Nijhuis, Assad M. Butt, Diego G. Peroni, Adam T. Fox, Jan Knol, Louise J. Michaelis, Ines Padua, Patricia Padrao, Pedro Moreira, Renata Barros, Hanan Sharif, Manzoor Ahmed, Nehad Gomaa, Joris Mens, Koen Smit, Frans Timmermans, Tomaž Poredoš, Anja Koren Jeverica, Marjeta Sedmak, Evgen Benedik, Meta Accetto, Mirjana Zupančič, Glauce Yonamine, Gustavo Soldateli, Bruna Aquilante, Antonio Carlos Pastorino, Cleonir Lui de Moraes Beck, Andrea Keiko Gushken, Mayra de Barros Dorna, Cristiane Nunes dos Santos, Ana Paula Moschione Castro, Abdulhadi Al-Qahtani, Rand Arnaout, Agha Rehan Khaliq, Rashid Amin, Farrukh Sheikh, Jorge Alvarez, Marta Anda, Miriam Palacios, Montserrat De Prada, Carmen Ponce, Bianca Balbino, Riccardo Sibilano, Thomas Marichal, Nicolas Gaudenzio, Hajime Karasuyama, Pierre Bruhns, Mindy Tsai, Laurent L. Reber, Stephen J. Galli, Ana Reis Ferreira, Josefina R. Cernadas, Aida del Campo García, Sara Pereiro Fernández, Nerea Sarmiento Carrera, Fernando Bandrés Sánchez-Cruz, José Ramón Fernández Lorenzo, Stephanie Claus, Claudia Pföhler, Franziska Ruëff, Regina Treudler, Mercedes Escarrer Jaume, Agustin Madroñero, Maria Teresa Guerra Perez, Juan Carlos Julia, Charlotte Hands Plovdiv, Lee Gethings, Jim Langridge, Karine Adel-Patient, Hervé Bernard, Ivona Barcievic-Jones, Raditsa Sokolova, Rumyana Yankova, Mariya Ivanovska, Marianna Murdjeva, Tatyana Popova, Svetlan Dermendzhiev, Martin Karjalainen, Ulrike Lehnigk, Duncan Brown, Julie C. Locklear, Julie Locklear, Ioana Maris, Jonathan Hourihane, Cristina Ornelas, Joana Caiado, Manuel Branco Ferreira, Manuel Pereira-Barbosa, Yolanda Puente, Juan Carlos Daza, Francisco Javier Monteseirin, Natalia Ukleja-Sokolowska, Ewa Gawronska-Ukleja, Magdalena Zbikowska-Gotz, Zbigniew Bartuzi, Lukasz Sokolowski, Aine Adams, Bernard Mahon, Karen English, Nelly Gourdon-Dubois, Laetitia Sellam, Bruno Pereira, Elodie Michaud, Khaled Messaoudi, Bertrand Evrard, Jean-Luc Fauquert, Francisca Palomares, Gador Gomez, Maria Jose Rodriguez, Luisa Galindo, Ana Molina, Lorella Paparo, Maurizio Mennini, Rosita Aitoro, Adam Wawrzeńczyk, Michał Przybyszewski, Anna Wawrzeńczyk, Hulya Ercan Sarıcoban, Meltem Ugras, Zerrin Yalvac, Bertine M. J. Flokstra-de Blok, J. L. van der Velde, Andrea Vereda, Clara Ippolito, Amaranta Traversa, Daniela Adriano, Daniela Manila Bianchi, Silvia Gallina, Lucia Decastelli, Melina Makatsori, Anne Miles, Sonja Posega Devetak, Iztok Devetak, Soraya Ainad Tabet, Jeanette Fisker Trandbohus, Pernille Winther, Hans-Jørgen Malling, Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen, Lene Heise Garvey, Chia-Chi Wang, Yin-Hua Cheng, Chun-Wei Tung, Mariola Dietrich, Ingo Marenholz, Birgit Kalb, Sarah Grosche, Katharina Blümchen, Rupert Schlags, Mareike Price, Sylke Rietz, Jorge Esparza-Gordillo, Susanne Lau, Young-Ae Lee, Ali Almontasheri, Mohammad Al Bahkali, Sahar Elshorbagi, Abdullah Alfhaid, Mashary Altamimi, Eman Madbouly, Hassan Al-Dhekri, Rand K. Arnaout, Maria Basagaña, Sira Miquel, Borja Bartolomé, Bettina Brix, Stefanie Rohwer, Sandra Brandhoff, Alena Berger, Waltraud Suer, Alf Weimann, Cristina Bueno, Laura Martín-Pedraza, Sara Abián, Pablo San Segundo-Acosta, Juan Carlos López-Rodríguez, Rodrigo Barderas, Eva Batanero, Javier Cuesta-Herranz, María Teresa Villalba, Magna Correia, Filipe Benito-Garcia, Cristina Arêde, Susana Piedade, Mário Morais-Almeida, James Hindley, Ross Yarham, Anna Kuklinska-Pijanka, David Gillick, Karine Patient, Martin D. Chapman, Katrine L. Bøgh, Ana Miranda, Eugénia Matos, Anna Sokolova, Huan Rao, Ivona Baricevic-Jones, Frances Smith, Wentong Xue, Helga Magnusdottir, Anna G. Vidarsdottir, Sigrun Lund, Anders Blom Jensen, Bjorn R. Ludviksson, Reyna Simon, Robert Elfont, Sean Bennett, Robert Voyksner, Maria de Lurdes Torre, Songül Yürek, Margaretha A. Faber, Annick Bastiaensen, Evelyne Mangodt, Athina van Gasse, Ine Decuyper, Vito Sabato, Margo M. Hagendorens, Chris H. Bridts, Luc S. De Clerck, Didier Ebo, Susanne Schwarz, Mandy Ziegert, Saskia Albroscheit, Christian Schwager, Skadi Kull, Jochen Behrends, Niels Röckendorf, Frauke Schocker, Andreas Frey, Arne Homann, Wolf-Meinhard Becker, Uta Jappe, Nesrine Zaabat, Sylvia Osscini, Chantal Agabriel, Benoît Sterling, Ania Carsin, Valérie Liabeuf, Monica Maćków, Alina Zbróg, Monica Bronkowska, Justine Courtois, Romy Gadisseur, Catherine Bertholet, Pierre Lukas, Etienne Cavalier, Philippe Delahaut, Birgit Quinting, Margareta Brandt Gertmo, Ewa Ternesten Hasseus, Vladyslava Barzylovych, Júlio Oliveira, Luis F. Ensina, Carolina S. Aranda, Leire Dopazo, Rebeca Lopez, Raquel Perez, Laura Santos-Diez, Agurtzane Bilbao, Juan Miguel Garcia, Ignacio García Núñez, María Ángeles Algaba Mármol, María José Barasona Villarejo, José Antonio Bácter Martos, Marina Suárez Vergara, José María Ignacio García, Agata Michalska, Grzegorz Sergiejko, Robert Zacniewski, Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, Cristina Deaconu, Mihaela Popescu, Roxana Silvia Bumbacea, Alkerta Ibranji, Elida Nikolla, Gjustina Loloci, Nanna Juel-Berg, Lau Fabricius Larsen, Lars Kjaergaard Poulsen, João Marcelino, Ricardo Prata, Ana Célia Costa, Fátima Duarte, Marta Neto, Jennifer Santos, Luís Câmara Pestana, Daniel Sampaio, Paola Minale, Paola Dignetti, Donatella Bignardi, Irena Nedelea, Florin-Dan Popescu, Mariana Vieru, Florin-Adrian Secureanu, Carmen Saviana Ganea, Miguel Vieira, José Pedro Moreira Silva, Timothy Watts, Sophia Watts, Marta Lomikovska, Marina Peredelskaya, Natalia Nenasheva, Ivana Filipovic, Zorica Zivkovic, Djordje Filipovic, Jennette Higgs, Amena Warner, and Carla Jones

Subjects
Immunologic diseases. Allergy, RC581-607
Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. The Effects of Microcredit on Women's Control over Household Spending in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Author

Jos Vaessen, Ana Rivas, Maren Duvendack, Richard Palmer Jones, Frans Leeuw, Ger vanGils, Ruslan Lukach, Nathalie Holvoet, Johan Bastiaensen, Jorge Garcia Hombrados, and Hugh Waddington

Subjects
Social Sciences
Abstract

The main objective of this Campbell systematic review was to provide a systematic review of the evidence on the effects of microcredit on women's control over household spending in developing countries. More specifically, we aimed to answer two related research questions: 1) what does the impact evaluative evidence say about the causal relationship between microcredit and specific dimensions of women's empowerment (women's control over household spending); and 2) what are the mechanisms which mediate this relationship. We prioritise depth of analysis over breadth, thus the scope of this review is narrower than previous systematic reviews on microfinance (Stewart et al., 2010; Duvendack et al. 2011; Stewart et al., 2012). We focused on specific aspects of women's empowerment which allowed us to combine statistical meta‐analysis and realist (context‐mechanism‐outcome) synthesis. From the different searches we identified an initial number of 310 papers that were selected for full text examination. Eventually, 29 papers were retained for further analysis, corresponding to 25 unique studies. In line with three recent other reviews on microfinance (Stewart et al., 2010; Duvendack et al., 2011; Stewart et al. 2012) we found that the microcredit evidence base is extensive, yet most studies are weak methodologically. From those studies deemed comparable and of minimum acceptable quality, we concluded that overall there is no evidence for an effect of microcredit on women's control over household spending. Executive summary BACKGROUND Over the past three decades, microfinance activities have spread across the globe, reaching tens of millions of poor households with tailored financial services. Microfinance can best be described as a field of intervention rather than a particular instrument. Initially, microfinance usually meant microcredit for working capital and very small investments, but increasingly it has been broadened to include savings/deposits, a limited range of micro‐insurance and payment services (including micro‐leasing) as well as a somewhat broader range of credit products for more substantial investments. In this study we focused on microcredit activities, constituting the bulk of microfinance activities across the globe. Microcredit activities have affected the lives of clients and others in multiple ways. The most frequently reported types of effects of credit at individual, enterprise and household level are the following: income, expenditure smoothing, and poverty alleviation effects; business growth and employment effects; schooling effects; and effects in terms of women's empowerment. Despite the diversity in microcredit schemes, many share two characteristics: they target poor women and often rely on some type of group‐based lending. Women's empowerment in relation to microcredit has been studied extensively within the context of this type of microcredit scheme. Most of these studies have been carried out in the context of microcredit group schemes in South Asia. It has been argued that access to microcredit can foster changes in individual attitudes of women (e.g. increased self‐reliance), power relations within the household (e.g. control over resources) and social status. An important dimension of empowerment concerns women's control over household spending. The main assumption is that by providing credit to poor women, their direct control over expenditures within the household increases, with subsequent implications for the status of women and the well‐being of women and other household members. Women's control over household spending is a frequently recurring aspect analyzed within the context of microcredit interventions, which allows us to study whether microcredit targeted at women affects women's control over household spending decisions and the circumstances in which this occurs. Despite the central and recurrent role across studies of this aspect of women's empowerment in relation to microcredit activities, there has been no previous review on this topic. The growing importance of microcredit has resulted in a vast number of research and evaluation studies, including impact studies. Consequently, the microfinance literature harbors a substantial number of synthesis studies which discuss a set of microcredit interventions and aim to generate overall conclusions on their effects. However, most of these studies face limitations in terms of depth of empirical assessment and the extent to which the identified effects can be attributed to microcredit. Moreover, methodological principles regarding comprehensive searches and principles of selection, coding, extraction and aggregation are often lacking in review studies. Partial exceptions are three recent systematic reviews which all differ in scope from the present one (Stewart et al., 2010; Duvendack et al. 2011; Stewart et al., 2012). The reviews respectively focus on microfinance (credit and savings) in Sub‐Sahara Africa, microcredit worldwide, and microfinance worldwide (credit, saving and leasing). Overall, these reviews suggest that the effects of microcredit on women's empowerment are at best mixed. In part this can be explained by the heterogeneity in microcredit interventions, contexts and target groups. However, the existing reviews did not use statistical meta‐analysis to synthesise evidence of effects, nor context‐mechanism‐outcome synthesis to understand the variation in effects. OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of the evidence on the effects of microcredit on women's control over household spending in developing countries. More specifically, we aimed to answer two related research questions: 1) what does the impact evaluative evidence say about the causal relationship between microcredit and specific dimensions of women's empowerment (women's control over household spending); and 2) what are the mechanisms which mediate this relationship. We prioritise depth of analysis over breadth, thus the scope of this review is narrower than previous systematic reviews on microfinance (Stewart et al., 2010; Duvendack et al. 2011; Stewart et al., 2012). We focused on specific aspects of women's empowerment which allowed us to combine statistical meta‐analysis and realist (context‐mechanism‐outcome) synthesis. CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING STUDIES FOR THIS REVIEW We included studies that analyzed the effects of microcredit schemes targeting poor women in low and middle income countries, as defined by the World Bank. Studies that did not include analysis on microcredit and the effect on one or more dimensions (specified in main body of the report) of women's control over household expenditures were excluded. Studies which gave evidence of addressing the attribution problem either through randomised design, quasi‐experimental matching, or regression analysis, were included. In practice, women's control over household spending (as a key dimension of empowerment) is influenced by many different factors. By focusing on those studies which explicitly addressed the challenge of separating the effect of microcredit from other influencing factors, we developed what we consider to be the most credible evidence base for drawing conclusions about the effects of microcredit on women's control over household expenditures in different contexts. SEARCH STRATEGY We conducted a comprehensive search covering all relevant academic databases, internet search engines and web sites with published and unpublished research, and also carried out extensive manual searches of books and additional journals not included in electronic data bases (searches were concluded on December 31, 2011). We used back‐referencing from recent studies as well as citation‐tracking to identify additional relevant studies. Finally, authors of studies which we were unable to retrieve were contacted. In addition, we contacted experts on microcredit and women's empowerment for additional references which we might have missed. Search strategies in databases and journals were adapted for each source. Where possible we used the existing keyword indices of particular databases. In addition, we applied our own list of combinations of keywords covering all relevant terms relating to the independent variable (i.e. credit and its variations) and the dependent variable (i.e. dimensions of women's control over household spending, empowerment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS From the different searches we identified an initial number of 310 papers that were selected for full text examination. Eventually, 29 papers were retained for further analysis, corresponding to 25 unique studies. These 25 independent findings were included in the synthesis. However, based on a systematic risk of bias assessment we found that more than half of the included studies had high threats to internal validity. Moreover, only about half of the studies show a clear and coherent link between a theoretical framework on microcredit and women's control over household spending and empirical data analysis. It should be noted that reviewing and synthesizing quantitative results from studies is only one side of the coin. The other side is to understand what makes them work, or what prevents them from working. Consequently, we conducted a qualitative synthesis of the included studies, which focused on identifying the mechanisms which underlie the causal relationship between microcredit and women's control over household spending. RESULTS The results of the meta‐analysis indicated that the effect sizes from experimental studies examining effects of microcredit on women's control over household spending are not statistically significantly different from zero. The effects from quasi‐experimental studies are statistically insignificant overall, and at best of small magnitude for those studies assessed of being of high risk of bias. We conclude that there is no consistent evidence for an effect of microcredit on women's control over household spending. In the qualitative analysis, using Coleman's (1986, 1990) typology of mechanisms, we identified five different situational mechanisms and eight different action‐formation mechanisms. Due to the combination of substantial heterogeneity in contexts (e.g. existing gender relations) and interventions (e.g. microcredit versus microcredit and additional services), and the lack of information in the studies on this heterogeneity, it was not possible to go beyond the identification of mechanisms, in terms of generating empirically tested articulated theories of change which are representative beyond a specific study context. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In line with three recent other reviews on microfinance (Stewart et al., 2010; Duvendack et al., 2011; Stewart et al. 2012) we found that the microcredit evidence base is extensive, yet most studies are weak methodologically. From those studies deemed comparable and of minimum acceptable quality, we concluded that overall there is no evidence for an effect of microcredit on women's control over household spending. Women's control over household resources constitutes an important intermediary dimension in processes of women's empowerment. Given the overall lack of evidence for an effect of microcredit on women's control over household resources it is therefore very unlikely that, overall, microcredit has a meaningful and substantial impact on empowerment processes in a broader sense. While impacts on empowerment may appear to have occurred in particular studies, the high risk of bias of studies providing positive assessments suggests that such findings are of limited validity. Our conclusions on the effects of microcredit on empowerment are also in line with previous systematic reviews by Duvendack et al. (2011) and Stewart (et al. 2010) who report to a limited extent on empowerment effects. Consequently, there appears to be a gap between the often optimistic societal belief in the capacity of microcredit to ameliorate the position of women in decision‐making processes within the household on the one hand, and the empirical evidence base on the other hand. However, our review markedly differs from previous reviews in two regards. First, we specifically focused on microcredit and women's empowerment captured through women's control over household expenditures. Second, as a result of this narrower focus, we were able to conduct statistical meta‐analysis and extract behavioral mechanisms which can help to explain why and how microcredit can make a difference. The advantage of our approach was that the identified mechanisms all stem from studies which show evidence of addressing the attribution problem. Consequently, we can be quite confident of the insights that they provided on the effects of microcredit on women's control over household spending for particular populations of microcredit female clients and their families. Those studies that showed evidence of addressing the attribution problem were relatively weak on underlying theory. Moreover, they often lacked essential information such as the nature of the intervention and how it related to empowerment (e.g. how solidarity groups affect empowerment processes) or the slowly evolving gender relations in different contexts (e.g. the evolution of societal norms and the relationship with power relations in the household). A next logical step would be to undertake a systematic review of qualitative studies which often provide rich and context‐specific information on microcredit and women's decision‐making power in the household. Such a review should ideally build on the mechanisms identified in the present review and would bring us closer to uncovering credible theories of microcredit and the circumstances in which it may change women's decision‐making power.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Low MT‐CO1 in Monocytes and Microvesicles Is Associated With Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Author

Paul Holvoet, Maarten Vanhaverbeke, Katarzyna Bloch, Pieter Baatsen, Peter Sinnaeve, and Stefan Janssens

Subjects
blood cell, cardiovascular events, gene, ischemia, microvesicles, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701
Abstract

BackgroundCytochrome oxidase (COX) IV complex regulates energy production in mitochondria. Impaired COX gene expression is related to obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but whether it is directly related to the incidence of cardiovascular events is unknown. We investigated whether COX gene expression in monocytes is predictive for cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease patients. To avoid monocyte isolation from fresh blood, we then aimed to validate our findings in monocyte‐derived microvesicles isolated from plasma. Methods and ResultsWe enrolled 142 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography between June 2010 and January 2011 and followed 67 patients with stable coronary artery disease prospectively for at least 3 years. Twenty‐two patients experienced a new cardiovascular event (32.8%). Circulating CD14+ monocytes and microvesicles were isolated with magnetic beads, and COX mRNA levels were measured with quantitative polymerase chain reaction, after normalization with 5 validated house‐keeping genes. Patients in the lowest tertile of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase, subunit I (MT‐COI) in monocytes at baseline had a higher risk for developing a new event after adjusting for age, sex, (ex)smoking, body mass index, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, low‐density lipoprotein– and high‐density lipoprotein–cholesterol, triglycerides, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6, and number of diseased vessels (harzard ratio [HR], 3.95; 95% CI, 1.63–9.57). Patients in the lowest tertile of MT‐COI in monocyte‐specific microvesicles had also a higher risk of developing a new event (adjusted HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 1.77–14). ConclusionsIn the current blinded study, low MT‐COI in monocytes of coronary artery disease patients identifies a population at risk for new cardiovascular events. For the first time, we show that signatures in monocyte‐specific microvesicles in plasma have similar predictive properties.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Food-restriction in obese dyslipidaemic diabetic mice partially restores basal contractility but not contractile reserve.

Author

Van den Bergh A, Vangheluwe P, Vanderper A, Carmeliet P, Wuytack F, Janssens S, Flameng W, Holvoet P, and Herijgers P

Subjects
Animals, Calcium metabolism, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental pathology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 pathology, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Obese, Myocardium pathology, Obesity diet therapy, Obesity pathology, Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium-Transporting ATPases metabolism, Ventricular Function, Left, Weight Loss, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental physiopathology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 physiopathology, Food Deprivation, Hyperlipidemias complications, Myocardial Contraction, Obesity complications
Abstract

Aims: Weight reduction programmes in morbidly obese, diabetic, and hyperlipidaemic subjects usually improve cardiac load and subsequently reverse hypertrophy. However, their effect on contractile dysfunction and impaired cardiac functional reserve is unknown., Methods and Results: The effect of food-restriction-induced weight loss on in vivo cardiac contractility before and during beta-adrenergic stimulation was assessed using left ventricular pressure-volume analysis in a mouse model featuring obesity and Type II diabetes (ob/ob), obesity, Type II diabetes, atherogenic dyslipidaemia, and hypertension (LDLR-/-;ob/ob), or wild-type. In addition, sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) reuptake, interstitial collagen accumulation, and aortic atherosclerosis were measured. Food-restriction resulted in a 54% lower weight. Weight loss largely normalized pre- and afterload in both ob/ob and LDLR-/-;ob/ob mice. Contractility and relaxation improved after weight loss, partly explained by improved SR Ca(2+) reuptake. Ventricular-vascular stiffening, interstitial collagen accumulation, and aortic atherosclerosis were less in food-restricted than in free-fed LDLR-/-;ob/ob mice. In contrast, cardiac reserve was similarly impaired in free-fed and food-restricted ob/ob and LDLR-/-;ob/ob mice., Conclusion: Food-restriction in obese diabetic mice leads to improved cardiac performance by diminishing cardiac load and by ameliorating the intrinsic contractile properties of the cardiac muscle. However, cardiac reserve under dobutamine stimulation did not increase.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results