Search

Objectives: Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have mainly included treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, open-label, double-arm, nonrandomized study in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 with and without cirrhosis, who had good viral suppression on their antiretroviral regimens. All patients were pretreated with a first-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitor (PI) plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Patients received a fixed-dose combination of LDV/SOF for 12 weeks, or for 24 weeks if cirrhosis was present. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and patient-reported outcomes., Results: Of the 68 patients enrolled, 39.7% had cirrhosis. Sixty-five patients [95.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 87.6-99.1%; P < 0.0001] achieved an SVR, with similar rates of SVR in those with and without cirrhosis. Tolerance was satisfactory, with mainly grade 1 or 2 adverse events. Among patient-reported outcomes, only fatigue significantly decreased at the end of treatment compared with baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.04]. Mean tenofovir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) at week 4 was high, with mean ± SD AUC variation between baseline and week 4 higher in cirrhotic than in noncirrhotic patients (3261.57 ± 1920.47 ng/mL vs. 1576.15 ± 911.97 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.03). Mild proteinuria (54.4%), hypophosphataemia (50.0%), blood bicarbonate decrease (29.4%) and hypokalaemia (13.2%) were reported. The serum creatinine level was not modified., Conclusions: LDV/SOF provided a high SVR rate in PI-experienced subjects coinfected with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1, including patients with cirrhosis., (© 2017 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

Objectives: PROTEA is a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy as an alternative to triple therapy., Methods: Patients fully suppressed on first-line antiretrovirals (viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) were switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 137) or with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (n = 136). Treatment failure was HIV-1 RNA level ≥ 50 copies/mL at week 96 or discontinuation of study treatment [Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm]., Results: Patients were mainly male and white, with mean age 44 years. In the primary efficacy analysis, the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by week 96 [intent to treat (ITT)] was lower in the DRV/r monotherapy arm (103 of 137 patients; 75%) than in the triple therapy arm (116 of 136 patients; 85%) [difference -10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -19.5, -0.7%]. In the switch-included analysis, monotherapy was noninferior to triple therapy. In a post hoc analysis, for patients with nadir CD4 count ≥ 200 cells/μL, rates of HIV-1 RNA suppression were 82 of 96 patients (85%) in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and 88 of 106 patients (83%) in the triple therapy arm. No treatment-emergent primary protease inhibitor mutations were detected in either arm. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two arms; however, one patient in the monotherapy arm was hospitalized with HIV encephalitis and elevated cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 RNA., Conclusions: In this study, in patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy vs. triple therapy at week 96 in the primary ITT switch-equals-failure analysis, particularly in patients with CD4 counts < 200 cells/μL., (© 2016 British HIV Association.)

Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to review the evidence and update a meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety results from randomized controlled trials of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy., Methods: A PubMed/EMBASE search was conducted to find randomized trials of PI/r monotherapy vs. triple therapy in patients with HIV-1 RNA suppression at baseline (<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). Rates of virological suppression were analysed using switch-equals-failure and intensification-included endpoints [intent-to-treat (ITT)]. The rate of treatment-emergent resistance mutations, neurocognitive function endpoints, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 RNA were also analysed by treatment arm., Results: There were 2303 patients from 13 different randomized clinical trials of darunavir/r monotherapy (n = 784: MONET, MONOI, Monarch and PROTEA), lopinavir/r monotherapy (n = 829: OK pilot, OK-04, KalMo, KALESOLO, KRETA, MOST and DREAM), atazanavir/r monotherapy (n = 103: MODAT), or all three (n = 587: PIVOT). HIV-1 RNA plasma suppression was lower in the PI/r monotherapy arm compared with the triple therapy arm in the switch-equals-failure analysis [difference -8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -11.9 to -4.8%], but not when intensification was included (difference 0.5%; 95% CI -2.5 to 3.6%). Rates of resistance mutations were similar between arms, as was overall neurocognitive function., Conclusions: PI/r monotherapy showed a higher risk of plasma HIV-1 RNA elevations. However, there was no increased risk of treatment-emergent drug resistance, neurocognitive endpoints did not differ, and HIV-1 RNA suppression rates after intensification were similar between PI/r monotherapy and triple therapy., (© 2015 British HIV Association.)

Objectives: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the noninferiority of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PH) vs. polylactic acid (PLA) for the treatment of facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected adults., Methods: A randomized, blinded, multicentre, noninferiority 96-week study was carried out. Patients with facial lipoatrophy were randomly assigned to receive intradermal injections with PH or PLA, and were blinded to the filler. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient satisfaction at week 48 assessed using a visual analogue scale score (VAS). Secondary efficacy end-points included cheek thickness and skin-fold, lipoatrophy grading and quality of life. Safety was assessed by the reporting of adverse events., Results: A total of 148 patients were included in the study; 93% were men, the median age was 47 years, the median CD4 count was 528 cells/μL, and the median duration of antiretroviral therapy was 12 years. Mean VAS increased from 2.8 at baseline to 7.1 and 7.5 in the PLA and PH arms, respectively, at week 48 (P=0.0002 for noninferiority) and was sustained at week 96 (6.7 and 7.9 in the PLA and PH arms, respectively; P=0.003 for noninferiority). Cheek thickness and skin-fold increases and lipoatrophy improvement were similar in the two arms. Quality of life remained unchanged or improved depending on the questionnaire used. In injected patients, subcutaneous nodules emerged in 28 (41%) and 26 (37%) patients in the PLA and PH arms, respectively (P=0.73). Four patients in the PH arm developed severe inflammatory nodules, a median of 17 months after the last injection., Conclusions: PH and PLA have similar efficacies in the treatment of facial lipoatrophy, but PH may be associated with more delayed inflammatory nodules., (© 2013 British HIV Association.)

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities of interest over 96 weeks of treatment with etravirine or placebo in the pooled TMC125 DUET (Demonstrate Undetectable viral load in patients Experienced with ARV Therapy) trials., Methods: Treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients randomly received etravirine 200 mg twice a day (bid) or placebo, plus a background regimen. The frequency and severity of neuropsychiatric, rash, hepatic and lipid AEs were analysed; frequencies were also adjusted for total patient-years of exposure (PYE)., Results: A total of 599 and 604 patients received etravirine and placebo, respectively (median treatment duration 96.0 and 69.6 weeks, respectively). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the frequency of neuropsychiatric AEs. However, a significant difference in the frequency of rash was observed (20.5% vs. 11.8%, respectively; P < 0.0001); rash was generally mild to moderate in severity; the rate of discontinuation because of rash was low (2.2% vs. 0% in the etravirine and placebo groups, respectively). The frequency of hepatic AEs was low and similar between the treatment groups (8.7% vs. 7.1%, respectively; P = 0.3370); hepatic enzyme levels did not increase over time. Lipid-related laboratory abnormalities and changes over time in lipid levels were generally comparable between treatment groups. Adjusting for treatment exposure, the frequency of AEs remained similar between treatment groups, with the exception of rash [13.7 vs. 9.3 per 100 PYE; relative risk (95% confidence interval) 1.48 (1.02-1.95)]., Conclusions: The frequency of AEs of interest was generally similar between the treatment groups, both overall and when adjusted for treatment exposure, with the exception of rash which was more frequent in the etravirine group., (© 2012 British HIV Association.)

We examined the prevalence and the extent of prolongation of the PR and QRS intervals and their relation to anti-HIV treatments and other clinical characteristics in 970 HIV-infected patients, 749 treated with antiretroviral therapy and 221 untreated. Age, body mass index, heart rate, and treatment with β-blockers and HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) were independent predictors of increase in the duration of the PR interval. Male gender, Caucasian ethnicity, heart rate, duration of antiretroviral therapy, and use of PIs were independent predictors of an increase in the duration of the QRS interval. Users of HIV PIs had an adjusted QRS-interval duration that was 2.6 ms (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-3.9) longer than the interval in nonusers (P = 0.0004). The adjusted odds ratios of first-degree atrioventricular block (n = 54) and complete bundle branch block (n = 23) were 1.62 (95% CI 0.90-2.89; P = 0.10) and 2.71 (95% CI 1.10-7.13; P = 0.03), respectively, in patients taking PIs. These findings may have important clinical implications, particularly with respect to QRS prolongation in patients with myocardial ischemia or heart failure.

Background: The toxicities, cost and complexity of triple combinations warrant the search for other treatment options, such as boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy. MONotherapy AntiRetroviral Kaletra (MONARK) is the first randomized trial comparing lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy to triple combination therapy with zidovudine/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naïve patients., Methods: A total of 136 antiretroviral-naïve patients, with a CD4 cell count above 100 cells/microL and a plasma HIV RNA below 100,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, were randomized and dosed with either lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n = 83) or lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine (n = 53). We focus here on patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm followed to week 96. The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis initially involved all patients randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n = 83), and then focused on patients who had an HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 (n = 56)., Results: At week 96, 39 of 83 patients (47%) had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, five of 83 had HIV RNA between 50 and 400 copies/mL, and three of 83 had HIV RNA > 400 copies/mL. Focusing on the 56 patients with an HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48, 38 of 56 patients (68%) had a sustained HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL to week 96. To week 96, a total of 28 patients (34%) had discontinued the study treatment. In addition, the allocated treatment was changed for seven patients. PI-associated resistance mutations were evident in five of 83 patients in the monotherapy arm from baseline to week 96., Conclusion: By ITT analysis, 39 of the 83 patients initially randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 96. The occurrence in some patients of low-level viraemia (50-500 copies/mL) may increase the risk of drug resistance. First-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy cannot be systematically recommended.

Objective: This pharmacokinetic study was designed to characterize interactions between amprenavir and the lopinavir-ritonavir combination in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus in whom previous antiretroviral therapy had failed., Methods: Twenty-seven patients included in a randomized clinical trial (ANRS [National Agency for AIDS Research] Protocol 104) participated in this study. They were randomized to receive ritonavir at a dose of either 100 mg twice daily or 200 mg twice daily. For the first 2 weeks of therapy, they were randomly assigned to receive lopinavir (400 mg twice daily) and ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), amprenavir (600 mg twice daily) plus ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), lopinavir (400 mg twice daily) and ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) plus additional ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), or amprenavir (600 mg twice daily) plus ritonavir (200 mg twice daily). From week 3 onward, all patients received amprenavir plus lopinavir-ritonavir with or without an additional ritonavir dose (100 mg twice daily). The pharmacokinetics of the 3 drugs was studied in weeks 2 and 6 of therapy., Results: Median amprenavir concentrations decreased by 54% (P =.004) when lopinavir was added to the amprenavir-ritonavir regimen. Lopinavir weakly displaced amprenavir from plasma proteins: The average unbound fraction of amprenavir was 0.089 in week 2 and 0.114 in week 6 (P =.03), but this did not fully account for the observed interaction. Increasing the ritonavir dose did not affect the amprenavir concentration. The relationship between lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations fitted a maximum effect (E(max)) model;the average concentration of ritonavir that yielded a lopinavir concentration of 8119 ng/mL (50% of E(max)) was 602 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 22%). There was a significant relationship between the lopinavir inhibitory quotient and the virologic response in week 2 (P =.005)., Conclusion: Lopinavir markedly decreases the amprenavir concentration during amprenavir and lopinavir-ritonavir combination therapy. The inhibitory quotients were more predictive of the short-term virologic response than was the level of drug exposure.

Objective: 1. to assess the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the occurrence of bacteraemia in HIV-infected patients and their clinical and microbiological characteristics. 2. to identify risk factors for bacteraemia in this setting., Methods: The files of all HIV-infected patients hospitalized for an episode of bacteraemia in a 28-bed infectious diseases unit between January 1995 and December 1998 were reviewed. Cases occurring during HAART were compared to cases occurring in patients not receiving HAART. Furthermore, in a case-control study, patients with bacteraemia occurring during HAART were compared with other patients receiving HAART., Results: There were 74 episodes of bacteraemia in patients not receiving HAART and 31 episodes in patients receiving HAART. The occurrence of bacteraemia fell from 10.5/100 hospitalizations in 1995 to 5.5/100 in 1998 (P = 0.02 trend test). The occurence of P. aeruginosa bacteraemia fell sharply (9/398 vs 1/273, P = 0.05). A significant fall in catheter-related infections was observed between 1995 and 1998 (5.5% vs 1.8%). The two-thirds/one-third distribution of hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections remained stable throughout the period study. In patients receiving HAART, the case-control study showed by multivariate analysis, that a CD4 cell count of less than 100/ micro L [OR = 7.3 (1.9-49.7)], and the use of exogenous devices [OR = 13.3 (2.5-71)] were significantly associated with the risk of bacteraemia., Conclusion: The introduction of HAART has been associated with a significant fall in the occurrence of bacteraemia. However, patients with a low CD4 cell count remain at risk of bacteraemia with similar microbiological and epidemiological characteristics than in the pre-HAART era.

Background: The natural history of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is poorly documented. We attempted to identify factors predictive of progression and survival in HIV-infected patients with KS and CD4+ cell counts greater than 100/microL., Patients and Methods: We studied retrospectively 78 HIV-infected patients diagnosed as having KS between 1989 and 1995. The following variables were assessed as potential predictors of progression and death, in a Cox proportional hazards model: age, sex, ethnic group, transmission group, site of the first KS lesions, duration of KS, concomitant opportunistic infections or malignancies, antiretroviral drug therapy (excluding protease inhibitors), antiherpes treatments, neutrophil counts, CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts, plasma HIV load, p24 antigenaemia, beta2-microglobulinaemia and immunoglobin A and G serum levels., Results: During a median follow-up of 22 months (3-81 months), KS progressed in 66 of the 78 patients. The median survival time after progression was 68 months (9-126 months). Multivariate analysis identified only visceral KS, a high neutrophil count and a high serum immunoglobulin (Ig) level as independent predictors of progression (P < 0.05). Previous and concomitant opportunistic diseases (P = 0.003) and low CD4+ cell counts (P = 0.013) were independently associated with shorter survival; in contrast KS therapy did not independently influence survival., Conclusion: Progression of KS is predicted by markers of KS severity, while overall survival is best predicted by markers of immunodeficiency (opportunistic diseases and the CD4+ cell count).

Nitrite production by rat alveolar macrophages was studied to determine the role of L-arginine oxidation in the interaction between these cells and Pneumocystis carinii. Alveolar macrophages from rats obtained from two different breeders were used: rats from Janvier breeder had latent P. carinii infection, while those from Charles River breeder were bred in a germ-free environment. Pneumocystis carinii increased in vitro nitrite generation by unstimulated alveolar macrophages from Janvier rats only, and this was blocked by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. Incubation of cells from Janvier and Charles River rats with lipopolysaccharide and/or interferon-gamma increased nitrite production to a similar extent. Pneumocystis carinii partially decreased nitrite release by activated alveolar macrophages, and this was still inhibited by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. In the presence of P. carinii, superoxide dismutase used as a superoxide anion scavenger had no effect on nitrite production by activated cells. These results show that prior exposure to P. carinii leads to nitric oxide production by rat alveolar macrophages. Although the magnitude of this production seems to be moderate, it is of biological significance since cells of P. carinii-naive rats do not generate nitrite whereas those of latently infected rats do.