Search

We report the performance of protein-protein docking predictions by our group for recent rounds of the Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions (CAPRI), a community-wide assessment of state-of-the-art docking methods. Our prediction procedure uses a protein-protein docking program named LZerD developed in our group. LZerD represents a protein surface with 3D Zernike descriptors (3DZD), which are based on a mathematical series expansion of a 3D function. The appropriate soft representation of protein surface with 3DZD makes the method more tolerant to conformational change of proteins upon docking, which adds an advantage for unbound docking. Docking was guided by interface residue prediction performed with BindML and cons-PPISP as well as literature information when available. The generated docking models were ranked by a combination of scoring functions, including PRESCO, which evaluates the native-likeness of residues' spatial environments in structure models. First, we discuss the overall performance of our group in the CAPRI prediction rounds and investigate the reasons for unsuccessful cases. Then, we examine the performance of several knowledge-based scoring functions and their combinations for ranking docking models. It was found that the quality of a pool of docking models generated by LZerD, that is whether or not the pool includes near-native models, can be predicted by the correlation of multiple scores. Although the current analysis used docking models generated by LZerD, findings on scoring functions are expected to be universally applicable to other docking methods. Proteins 2017; 85:513-527. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Community-wide blind prediction experiments such as CAPRI and CASP provide an objective measure of the current state of predictive methodology. Here we describe a community-wide assessment of methods to predict the effects of mutations on protein-protein interactions. Twenty-two groups predicted the effects of comprehensive saturation mutagenesis for two designed influenza hemagglutinin binders and the results were compared with experimental yeast display enrichment data obtained using deep sequencing. The most successful methods explicitly considered the effects of mutation on monomer stability in addition to binding affinity, carried out explicit side-chain sampling and backbone relaxation, evaluated packing, electrostatic, and solvation effects, and correctly identified around a third of the beneficial mutations. Much room for improvement remains for even the best techniques, and large-scale fitness landscapes should continue to provide an excellent test bed for continued evaluation of both existing and new prediction methodologies.

We participated in rounds 6-12 of the critical assessment of predicted interaction (CAPRI) contest as the SKE-DOCK server and human teams. The SKE-DOCK server is based on simple geometry docking and a knowledge base scoring function. The procedure is summarized in the following three steps: (1) protein docking according to shape complementarity, (2) evaluating complex models, and (3) repacking side-chain of models. The SKE-DOCK server did not make use of biological information. On the other hand, the human team tried various intervention approaches. In this article, we describe in detail the processes of the SKE-DOCK server, together with results and reasons for success and failure. Good predicted models were obtained for target 25 by both the SKE-DOCK server and human teams. When the modeled receptor proteins were superimposed on the experimental structures, the smallest Ligand-rmsd values corresponding to the rmsd between the model and experimental structures were 3.307 and 3.324 A, respectively. Moreover, the two teams obtained 4 and 2 acceptable models for target 25. The overall result for both the SKE-DOCK server and human teams was medium accuracy for one (Target 25) out of nine targets.

During Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP7, Pacific Grove, CA, 2006), fams-ace was entered in the 3D coordinate prediction category as a human expert group. The procedure can be summarized by the following three steps. (1) All the server models were refined and rebuilt utilizing our homology modeling method. (2) Representative structures were selected from each server, according to a model quality evaluation, based on a 3D1D profile score (like Verify3D). (3) The top five models were selected and submitted in the order of the consensus-based score (like 3D-Jury). Fams-ace is a fully automated server and does not require human intervention. In this article, we introduce the methodology of fams-ace and discuss the successes and failures of this approach during CASP7. In addition, we discuss possible improvements for the next CASP.

In CASP6, the CHIMERA-group predicted full-atom models of all targets using SKE-CHIMERA, a Web-user interface system for protein structure prediction that allows human intervention at necessary stages; we used a lot of information from our own data and from publicly available data. Using SKE-CHIMERA, we iterated manual step (template selection and alignment by the in-house program CHIMERA) and automatic step (three-dimensional model building by the in-house program FAMS). The official CASP6 assessment showed that CHIMERA-group was one of the most successful predictors in homology modeling, especially for FR/H (Fold Recognition/Homologous). In this article, we introduce the method of CHIMERA-group and discuss its successes and failures in CASP6.