Search

Introduction: Midwifery care is associated with positive birth outcomes, access to community birth options, and judicious use of interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare maternity care preferences of university students across a range of maternity care systems and to explore whether preferences align with evidence-based recommendations and options available., Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed in 2014 and 2015 by a convenience sample of university students in 8 high-income countries across 4 continents (N = 4569). In addition to describing preferences for midwifery care and community birth options across countries, this study examined sociodemographic characteristics, psychological factors, knowledge about pregnancy and birth, and sources of information that shaped students' attitudes toward birth in relation to preferences for midwifery care and community birth options., Results: Approximately half of the student respondents (48.2%) preferred midwifery-led care for a healthy pregnancy; 9.5% would choose to give birth in a birthing center, and 4.5% preferred a home birth. Preference for midwifery care varied from 10.3% among women in the United States to 78.6% among women in the United Kingdom. Preferences for home birth varied from 0.3% among US women to 18.3% among Canadian women. Women, health science students, those with low childbirth fear, those who learned about pregnancy and birth from friends (compared with other sources, eg, the media), and those who responded from Europe were significantly more likely to prefer midwifery care and community birth. High confidence in knowledge of pregnancy and birth was linked to significantly higher odds of community birth preferences and midwifery care preferences., Discussion: It would be beneficial to integrate childbirth education into high school curricula to promote knowledge of midwifery care, pregnancy, and childbirth and to reduce fear among prospective parents. Community birth options need to be expanded to meet demand among the next generation of maternity service users., (© 2020 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.)

Unlabelled: REASONS FOR PERFORMING THIS STUDY: Intra-articular ethanol has been described to promote distal tarsal joint ankylosis. Its use and results in clinical cases affected by osteoarthritis (OA) have not been reported., Objectives: To describe and evaluate the results of treatment of distal tarsal joint OA by facilitated ankylosis stimulated by intra-articular ethanol injection., Methods: Twenty-four horses met the inclusion criteria of tarsometatarsal and centrodistal joint OA diagnosed by a positive response to intra-articular analgesia, radiographic evaluation and recurrence of lameness ≤ 4 months after intra-articular medication with a corticosteroid. Horses were sedated and, following a radiographic contrast study of the tarsometatarsal joint, medication with 2-4 ml of either 100% pure ethanol (G100) or a 70% ethanol (G70) solution was applied. Horses were classified as improved based on a 50% reduction from initial lameness grade combined with an increase in exercise level., Results: Of the 24 horses included in this study, 20 had the treatment performed bilaterally and 4 unilaterally. All horses were available for initial follow-up examination and 21 for a second one 6-9 months after treatment. This represented a total of 44 treated limbs and 35 available for long-term follow-up. Of these, 21/35 (60%) were considered improved, which corresponds to 11/21 horses (52%). Of 21 horses, 4 (19%) deteriorated and 2 of these developed significant complications related to treatment., Conclusions: Distal tarsal joint ankylosis with ethanol should be considered a safe and economic treatment in cases of distal tarsal joint OA that fail to show long-term improvement with intra-articular corticosteroid treatment., Potential Relevance: Ethanol should be considered in the treatment of certain cases of distal tarsal joint OA. The importance of performing an adequate radiographic contrast study of the tarsometatarsal joint prior to treatment is highlighted., (© 2011 EVJ Ltd.)

The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) has not gained widespread popularity in mandibular reconstruction, primarily because of concerns about pathologic fracture of the weakened radius. This study examines the effectiveness of plate fixation of the radius bone after harvest of the OCRFFF as a mechanism to minimize donor-site morbidity and increase the usefulness of the OCRFFF. Matched pairs of fresh human cadaveric radius bones were used in this study. Two study groups were designed. The first group was used to define the amount of strength lost after a typical bone graft harvest. The second group was designed to demonstrate how much torsional strength was regained by the application of an orthopedic reconstruction plate. Statistically significant results were obtained for both groups. In group 1, the strength of the cut bones compared with that of the unaltered bones was significantly decreased by 82% (P = 0.016). In group 2, the cut bones reinforced with a plate were 75% stronger (P = 0.002) than the bones that were only cut. Although the radius bone is significantly weakened by the harvest of a graft, much of this strength can be regained with plate fixation of the radius.