Search

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level variability, related to atherothrombotic risk increase, is mainly attributed to LPA gene, encoding apolipoprotein(a), with kringle IV type 2 (KIV2) copy number variation (CNV) acting as the primary genetic determinant. Genetic characterization of Lp(a) is in continuous growth; nevertheless, the peculiar structural characteristics of this variant constitute a significant challenge to the development of effective detection methods. The aim of the study was to compare quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in the evaluation of KIV2 repeat polymorphism., Methods: We analysed 100 subjects tested for cardiovascular risk in which Lp(a) plasma levels were assessed., Results: Correlation analysis between CNV values obtained with the two methods was slightly significant (R = 0.413, p = 0.00002), because of the wider data dispersion in qPCR compared with ddPCR. Internal controls C1, C2 and C3 measurements throughout different experimental sessions revealed the superior stability of ddPCR, which was supported by a reduced intra/inter-assay coefficient of variation determined in this method compared to qPCR. A significant inverse correlation between Lp(a) levels and CNV values was confirmed for both techniques, but it was higher when evaluated by ddPCR than qPCR (R = -0.393, p = 0.000053 vs R = -0.220, p = 0.028, respectively). When dividing subjects into two groups according to 500 mg/L Lp(a) cut-off value, a significantly lower number of KIV2 repeats emerged among subjects with greater Lp(a) levels, with stronger evidence in ddPCR than in qPCR (p = 0.000013 and p = 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: Data obtained support a better performance of ddPCR in the evaluation of KIV2 repeat polymorphism., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The renin angiotensin system affects haemostasis through different mechanisms; data on the possible role of angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism in the pathogenesis of deep venous thrombosis are conflicting, and no information is available regarding the A1166C polymorphism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor gene. In order to investigate this issue, angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1R polymorphisms were genotyped in 336 consecutive venous thromboembolism patients and 378 controls., Materials and Methods: Haemostasis-related risk factors have been evaluated by routine tests. Factor V Leiden, Factor II (G20210A), angiotensin-converting enzyme (I/D), and angiotensin type 1 receptor (A1166C) polymorphisms have been identified by molecular analysis., Results: We documented a significant association between angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype and venous thromboembolism (OR=2.19 95%CI 1.51-3.17 adjusted for acquired and haemostasis-related risk factors, P<0.0001); in patients with haemostasis-related risk factors, angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype modified the risk of venous thromboembolism in hyperhomocysteinaemic and Factor V Leiden patients and was associated with the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (OR=1.83 95%CI 1.06-3.17 P=0.03). In patients without haemostasis-related risk factors the angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype was still an independent predictor of venous thromboembolism (OR=3.29 95%CI 2.17-4.98 adjusted for acquired risk factors, P<0.0001). No significant association between the angiotensin type 1 receptor CC genotype and venous thromboembolism was found., Conclusions: This study shows that angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype represents a susceptibility marker of thrombosis in subjects apparently without predisposing factors and traditional thrombophilic alterations, and increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in subjects in whom a thrombogenic condition occurs. Moreover, angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype may be considered a new predisposing factor to venous thromboembolism recurrence.