Search

Bevacizumab is the only agent that many people can afford, yet there are only limited data on whether it improves macular oedema (MO) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in real-world clinical practice. Here we studied 12-month real-world treatment outcomes of bevacizumab for RVO-related MO.This was a multicentre, observational study analysing 12-month data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! (FRB) database. We studied treatment-naïve eyes with MO secondary to RVO commencing bevacizumab therapy between June 2009 and June 2019. Visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was a change in VA from baseline to 12 months.Two hundred and twenty treatment naive eyes were analyzed. The baseline VA for BRVO was better than CRVO (55.8 vs. 42.6 LogMAR letters) and this gap widened over the 12-month period, with a 12-month VA change of +14.0 (95% CI 11.1, 16.8) letters for BRVO and + 11.9 (95% CI 6.4, 17.4) for CRVO. The mean CST at baseline was 511 μm for BRVO and 627 μm for CRVO, falling at 12 months by -155 μm (-190, -121) in BRVO and -198 μm (-252, -145) in CRVO. The median number of injections for BRVO and CRVO completers was 7 (5, 9).Bevacizumab can be an effective treatment of RVO-MO in a real-world setting with outcomes approaching those reported by the seminal clinical trials. The functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal therapy were better for BRVO than CRVO.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the proportion of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice that reach ≥14 week treatment intervals and their outcomes. METHOD: We analysed data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! (FRB!) Project database, a prospectively designed registry of 'real-world' outcomes. Treatment-naive eyes starting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for nAMD from 1st January 2006 were included. Eyes were defined to have reached the ≥14 week treatment interval if they received ≥2 consecutive injections at treatment intervals of ≥14 week but not exceeding 26 weeks. Outcomes were reported in a subgroup of eyes that had 12 months of follow-up from reaching this interval. RESULTS: Of the 3907 treatment-naive eyes that started treatment during the identified periods on a treat-and-extend regimen and received at least 8 injections over the first 2 years, 402 (10%) eyes received at least 2 consecutive injections at an interval of ≥14 week during their follow-up. Fifty-two percent of these eyes maintained vision to 12 months, however only 40% stayed at this interval and 25% of the lesions reactivated. CONCLUSION: We found that only 10% of eyes with nAMD were extended beyond a 13-week injection interval and that over half had returned to a shorter interval by 12 months. Eyes that stayed at this extended treatment interval maintained stable vision. More data on the outcomes of eyes treated with intervals longer than 3 months are required to establish whether emerging VEGF inhibitors provide a more sustained effect than the currently available drugs.

The use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) since the pivotal phase 3 studies demonstrated their efficacy more than 10 years ago. The Fight Retinal Blindness! project was developed to track the treatment outcomes of patients with nAMD in real-world practice. Data from this registry have been used to answer several clinically relevant questions related to the treatment of nAMD including the effect of under-treatment, the comparative effectiveness of different anti-VEGF agents, long-term treatment outcomes, identifying optimal treatment regimens, and the rate and outcomes of rare adverse events. Observational studies are a valuable complement to the shortcomings of clinical trials and a combination of data from real-world settings and clinical trials are necessary to provide evidence on how to achieve the best outcomes for individual patients with nAMD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Importance To assess early outcomes of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) before patients have a chance to miss or discontinue treatment. Background Intravitreal VEGF inhibitors used to treat nAMD have been compared in various ways. The present study compared the 4-week responses to the first injection of either aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. Design Observational study. Participants Treatment-naive nAMD patients with visual acuity (VA) taken 22 to 48 days after the first treatment with an intravitreal VEGF inhibitor. Methods An observational study from a prospectively designed database. Main outcome measures VA change from baseline and proportion of eyes judged active 22 to 48 days after the first treatment. Results The overall mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change at 4 weeks was +3.7 (3.3, 4.0) letters. No pairwise comparisons in crude VA change or VA change after multivariate adjustment between the three agents were significant. However, after multivariate adjustment, more eyes treated with bevacizumab (90%) had active disease 4 weeks after the first injection than ranibizumab (84%; P = .013) and aflibercept (82%; P = .004). Older age, higher baseline vision and larger lesions were associated with lower VA change. Conclusion There was no significant difference in VA gains amongst all three drugs but ranibizumab and aflibercept seemed to be more efficacious in quelling disease activity 4 weeks after the first treatment. VA change after the first injection was driven largely by baseline characteristics such as age, baseline VA and lesion size.

IMPORTANCE There are limited data on real-world outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes receiving intravitreal treatments for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). BACKGROUND Cataract surgery may exacerbate oedema in some eyes with DMO resulting in inferior outcomes. DESIGN Matched, case-controlled retrospective study of observational data in routine clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS Eyes receiving intravitreal treatments for DMO tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. METHODS Eyes that underwent cataract surgery were identified and matched 1:1 with phakic controls also receiving intravitreal injections for DMO. We also assessed potential factors that were associated with better visual acuity (VA) outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change in VA 6 months after cataract surgery. RESULTS Cataract surgery was identified in 208 eyes of 156 patients of which 147 eyes had 6 months of observations before and after surgery. The mean VA 6 months after surgery improved by 10.6 letters and was similar to their matched phakic controls (68.8 vs 69.2 letters; P = 0.8). Mean CST both 6 months before (341 μm) and after (360 μm) surgery were similar (P = 0.08). However, these eyes had thicker maculae and they received more injections than their matched phakic controls both before and after surgery. Eyes with worse VA before surgery and those that had received intravitreal treatment in the 4 weeks preceding surgery were more likely to gain vision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Visual outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes receiving intravitreal therapy for DMO were reasonably better. Their maculae were thicker and required more injections in the 6 months before and after surgery than their phakic controls.

Importance To assess the impact of injection frequency on visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with intravitreal aflibercept. Background The UK licence for treatment of nAMD with aflibercept is based on the VIEW protocol. We tested the hypothesis that patients receiving fewer than the eight recommended injections in the first year would experience worse visual outcomes. Design Retrospective, single-centre observational study. Participants There were 42 eyes from 42 patients included. Methods Fight Retinal Blindness! software was used to record real-world outcomes of all treatment-naive eyes receiving aflibercept for at least 1 year. Main Outcome Measures Visual acuity (VA) at 1 year in eyes which received the recommended eight injections versus those receiving seven or fewer injections. Results There were 21 eyes (50%) that received the recommended eight aflibercept injections in the first year of treatment, whilst 14 eyes received seven injections, five received six injections and two received only five injections, with median VA change +7.0, +5.0, −4.0 and −6.5 LogMAR letters, respectively. Those eyes receiving seven or fewer injections had worse baseline vision. The main reasons for patients being undertreated were insufficient clinic capacity and non-attendance due to illness. Conclusions and Relevance Patients in the real-world receiving aflibercept for nAMD at fixed intervals as per UK licence could achieve similar visual improvement at 1 year compared with phase III clinical trials. Undertreated patients had worse visual outcomes. Measures need to be introduced to increase clinic capacity and closely follow non-attenders to improve future outcomes.

We tested whether the better subjective exercise tolerance perceived by mountaineers after altitude acclimatization relates to enhanced exercise economy. Thirty-two mountaineers performed progressive bicycle exercise to exhaustion at 490 m and twice at 5533 m (days 6–7 and day 11), respectively, during an expedition to Mt. Muztagh Ata. Maximal work rate (Wmax) decreased from mean ± SD 356 ± 73 watts at 490 m to 191 ± 49 watts and 193 ± 45 watts at 5533 m, days 6–7 and day 11, respectively; corresponding maximal oxygen uptakes (VO2max) were 50.7 ± 9.5, 26.3 ± 5.6, 24.7 ± 7.0 mL/min/kg (P = 0.0001 5533 m vs 490 m). On days 6–7 (5533 m), VO2 at 75% Wmax (152 ± 37 watts) was 1.75 ± 0.45 L/min, oxygen saturation 68 ± 8%. On day 11 (5533 m), at the same submaximal work rate, VO2 was lower (1.61 ± 0.47 L/min, P