Search

INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate the performance of the fully automated multiparameter CN-6000 hemostasis analyzer. METHODS Performance evaluation of the CN-6000 analyzer was conducted for 10 tests including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (aPTT), fibrinogen level, anti-Xa activity, and antithrombin activity using a unique portfolio of liquid ready-to-use reagents. Precision, sample and reagent carryovers, throughput, and sample turnaround time (STAT) function were prospectively assessed. Results from 343 samples (normal subjects, critically ill patients, patients receiving anticoagulants, subjects with high or low fibrinogen levels, and patients with decreased levels of factor II, V, VII, and X) were compared to those obtained on the STA-R Max 2® analyzer using dedicated reagents. RESULTS Total precision (coefficient of variation) was below 7% for all parameters in both normal and pathological ranges. For all analyzed parameters, results obtained on the CN-6000 were strongly correlated with those obtained on the STA-R Max 2®analyzer. Agreement between both instruments was excellent for all assays. The CN-6000 demonstrated a 30% higher throughput compared to the STA-R Max 2® (258 vs 185 tests per hour for a panel of tests including PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, factor V, anti-Xa, and D-Dimer). STAT turnaround time for critical care samples testing was

Acquired factor V inhibitor (AFVI) is an extremely rare disorder that may cause severe bleeding. To identify factors associated with bleeding risk in AFVI patients, a national, multicentre, retrospective study was made including all AFVI patients followed in 21 centres in France between 1988 and 2015. All patients had an isolated factor V (FV) deficiency50% associated with inhibitor activity. Patients with constitutional FV deficiency and other causes of acquired coagulation FV deficiencies were excluded. The primary outcome was incident bleeding and factors associated with the primary outcome were identified. Thirty-eight (74 [36-100] years, 42·1% females) patients with AFVI were analysed. Bleeding was reported in 18 (47·4%) patients at diagnosis and in three (7·9%) during follow-up (7 [0·2-48.7] months). At diagnosis, FV was10% in 31 (81·6%) patients. Bleeding at diagnosis was associated with a prolonged prothrombin time that strongly correlated with the AFVI level measured in plasma {r = 0·63, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0·36-0·80], P 0·05}. Bleeding onset during follow-up was associated with a slow AFVI clearance (P 0·001). The corresponding receiver operating characteristics curve showed that AFVI clearance was predictive of bleeding onset with an AFVI clearance of seven months with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 29-100) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 57-98, P = 0·02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AFVI clearance7 months increased the risk of bleeding by 8 (95% CI: [0·67-97], P = 0·075). Prothrombin time at diagnosis and time for clearance of FV inhibitor during follow-up are both associated with bleeding in patients with AFVI.

We read with great interest the comment by Suarez-Perez et al. on our article.[1] We share their concerns regarding the need for a cautious interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) positivity in patients with coronary virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Herein, we would like to add further insights in the discussion.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with both severe systemic inflammation and a prothrombotic state, as reflected by significant increases in fibrinogen and D‐dimers levels that have been associated with poor prognosis and high rates of severe pulmonary embolism. A recent report suggested a role for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) in the thrombotic manifestations associated with severe COVID‐19. As we also recently noticed unexplained lengthening of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in some critically ill COVID‐19 patients, we explored our patients for aPLA positivity.

The mechanisms underlying the variability of factor VIII (FVIII) levels are still poorly understood. The only receptor of FVIII identified so far is the lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), which is thought to be involved in FVIII degradation. We aimed to characterize biological and genetic factors related to FVIII variability, focusing on coding polymorphisms of the LRP gene and polymorphisms potentially detected by molecular screening of the LRP-binding domains of the FVIII gene. Plasma FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) and von Willebrand factor (VWF:Ag) antigen levels were measured in a sample of 100 healthy nuclear families (200 parents and 224 offspring). The ABO blood group and the three coding polymorphisms of the LRP gene (A217V, D2080N and C766T) were genotyped. Lipids and anthropometric factors poorly contributed to the variability of FVIII:C (