Search

Background: Single-agent chemotherapy produces partial responses in the range of 7-27% in patients with Stage IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Cisplatin-based combination regimens have achieved higher response rates but with significant toxicity. Two prior studies employing 24-hour infusions of paclitaxel showed responses of 21% and 24%. The purpose of this Phase II study was to determine the effects of paclitaxel administered by short duration infusions on response rate, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with NSCLC., Methods: Twenty patients with histologically proven Stage IV NSCLC were enrolled in this study. All were treated on an outpatient basis with standard premedication followed by paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 infused intravenously over 3 hours. Treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles., Results: The objective response rate was 6/19 (32%; 95% confidence interval, 13-57%). The median duration of response was 6.0 months (range, 2-13 months). The median survival of the entire group was 6.0 months (range, 2-24+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 22%. Toxicity was mild, with only one hospitalization required for treatment of catheter-related thrombosis. Nonresponding patients were found to have worsening Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-G and FACT-L scores. Because this was a small clinical study, it did not demonstrate consistent improvement in FACT-G or FACT-L in responding patients., Conclusions: Paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion is a well-tolerated, active single agent in the treatment of Stage IV NSCLC, worthy of further study. Baseline QOL scores predicted those more likely to respond to treatment, but changes in QOL status did not correlate well with objective response status.

Estazolam is a new benzodiazepine hypnotic agent with an intermediate half-life of 12 to 15 hours. The authors designed an investigation to compare its hypnotic efficacy to that of flurazepam, generally considered the reference standard. The hypnotic efficacy of estazolam at two doses (1 mg and 2 mg) was compared with that of flurazepam (30 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 7-night study that involved 223 outpatients with insomnia. On subjective assessments of the patients, no differences were noted between estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam 30 mg on any of six sleep parameters. Patients who were receiving estazolam 1 mg rated their sleep significantly better than did patients who were receiving placebo on all parameters except sleep latency. Global evaluation of the physicians indicated significant improvement in quality of sleep, sleep depth, sleep duration, and nocturnal awakenings in all three active treatment groups; estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam also decreased sleep latency significantly. The percentage of patients who reported any adverse experience was 68% for flurazepam, 58% for estazolam 2 mg, and 54% for estazolam 1 mg; the incidence of adverse events in the placebo group was 43%. In conclusion, estazolam 2 mg was found to be as effective a hypnotic as flurazepam 30 mg. Estazolam 1 mg is also effective in the treatment of outpatients with insomnia, but to a lesser degree.