1. Computed tomography‐determined skeletal muscle density predicts 3‐year mortality in initial‐dialysis patients in China
- Author
-
Ming‐jie Sheng, Jing‐yuan Cao, Shi‐mei Hou, Min Li, Yao Wang, Qiang Fang, A‐feng Miao, Min Yang, Shu‐su Liu, Chun‐hong Hu, Cui‐lan Liu, Shi‐yuan Wang, Jing Zheng, Jing‐jie Xiao, Xiao‐liang Zhang, Hong Liu, Bi‐cheng Liu, and Bin Wang
- Subjects
Computed tomography ,Dialysis ,First lumbar vertebra level ,Prognosis ,Skeletal muscle quality ,Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,RC925-935 ,Human anatomy ,QM1-695 - Abstract
Abstract Background Skeletal muscle mass and quality assessed by computed tomography (CT) images of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level have been established as risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in several illnesses, but the relevance for dialysis patients is unclear. A few studies have suggested a correlation between CT‐determined skeletal muscle mass and quality at the first lumbar vertebra (L1) level and adverse outcomes. Generally, chest CT does not reach beyond L1. We aimed to determine whether opportunistic CT scan (chest CT)‐determined skeletal muscle mass and quality at L1 are associated with mortality in initial‐dialysis patients. Methods This 3‐year multicentric retrospective study included initial‐dialysis patients from four centres between 2014 and 2017 in China. Unenhanced CT images of the L1 and L3 levels were obtained to assess skeletal muscle mass [by skeletal muscle index, (SMI), cm2/m2] and quality [by skeletal muscle density (SMD), HU]. Skeletal muscle measures at L1 were compared with those at L3. The sex‐specific optimal cutoff values of L1 SMI and L1 SMD were determined in relation to all‐cause mortality. The outcomes were all‐cause death and cardiac death. Cox regression models were applied to investigate the risk factors for death. Results A total of 485 patients were enrolled, of whom 257 had both L1 and L3 images. Pearson's correlation coefficient between L1 and L3 SMI was 0.84 (P 0.05). Low L1 SMD (n = 280, 57.73%) was diagnosed based on the optimal cutoff value (
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF