Search

Objective: To evaluate correlations between speech and gait parameters in the long term and under different medication and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) conditions in a cohort of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients., Methods: This observational study included consecutive PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS. Axial symptoms were evaluated using a standardized clinical-instrumental approach. Speech and gait were assessed by perceptual and acoustic analyses and by the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test, respectively. Disease motor severity was evaluated with the total score and subscores of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III. Different stimulation and drug treatment conditions were assessed: on-stimulation/off-medication, off-stimulation/off-medication, and on-stimulation/on-medication., Results: Twenty-five PD patients with a 5-year median follow-up after surgery (range 3-7 years) were included (18 males; disease duration at surgery: 10.44 [SD 4.62] years; age at surgery: 58.40 [SD 5.73] years). In the off-stimulation/off-medication and on-stimulation/on-medication conditions, patients who spoke louder had also the greater acceleration of the trunk during gait; whereas in the on-stimulation/on-medication condition only, patients with the poorer voice quality were also the worst to perform the sit to stand and gait phases of the iTUG. Conversely, patients with the higher speech rate performed well in the turning and walking phases of the iTUG., Conclusions: This study underlines the presence of different correlations between treatment effects of speech and gait parameters in PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS. This may allow us to better understand the common pathophysiological basis of these alterations and to develop a more specific and tailored rehabilitation approach for axial signs after surgery., (© 2023 European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To evaluate in a real clinical scenario the impact of the ILAE-recommended "Harmonized neuroimaging of epilepsy structural sequences"- HARNESS protocol in patients affected by focal epilepsy., Methods: We prospectively enrolled focal epilepsy patients who underwent a structural brain MRI between 2020 and 2021 at Modena University Hospital. For all patients, MRIs were: (a) acquired according to the HARNESS-MRI protocol (H-MRI); (b) reviewed by the same neuroradiology team. MRI outcomes measures were: the number of positive (diagnostic) and negative MRI; the type of radiological diagnosis classified in: (1) Hippocampal Sclerosis; (2) Malformations of cortical development (MCD); (3) Vascular malformations; (4) Glial scars; (5) Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors; (6) Dual pathology. For each patient we verified for previous MRI (without HARNESS protocol, noH-MRI) and the presence of clinical information in the MRI request form. Then the measured outcomes were reviewed and compared as appropriate., Results: A total of 131 patients with H-MRI were included in the study. 100 patients out from this cohort had at least one previous noH-MRI scan. Of those, 92/100 were acquired at the same Hospital than H-MRI and 71/92 on a 3T scanner. The HARNESS protocol revealed 81 (62%) positive and 50 (38%) negative MRI, and MCD was the most common diagnosis (60%). Among the entire pool of 100 noH-MRI, 36 resulted positive with a significant difference (p < .001) compared to H-MRI. Similar findings were observed when accounting for the expert radiologists (H-MRI = 57 positive; noH-MRI = 33, p < .001) and the scanner field strength (H-MRI 43 = positive, noH-MRI = 23, p < .001), while clinical information were more present in H-MRI (p < .002)., Significance: The adoption of a standardized and optimized MRI acquisition protocol together with adequate clinical information contribute to identify a higher number of potentially epileptogenic lesions (especially FCD) thus impacting concretely on the clinical management of patients with focal epilepsy., (© 2023 The Authors. Epileptic Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)