Search

OBJECTIVES To determine how measurements of the internal carotid artery (ICA) cross-sectional area will differ systematically when obtained by grayscale, color Doppler, and power Doppler imaging. METHODS A total of 451 patients had greater than 40% diameter stenosis in at least a single ICA. Anteroposterior and transverse luminal diameters were measured in 609 arteries on grayscale, color, and power Doppler transverse images of the carotid bulb and proximal and distal ICAs. Cross-sectional areas were calculated and compared by a repeated-measures analysis of variance model to assess for significant differences. RESULTS Mean ICA cross-sectional areas ± SDs as measured by grayscale, power Doppler, and color Doppler imaging were 122 ± 81, 122 ± 79, and 125 ± 79 mm2 , respectively. The mean ICA area estimated by color Doppler imaging was significantly greater than that estimated by power Doppler imaging (P

Purpose. To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of intima thickness (IT) measurements at different sites along the common carotid artery and compare with intima–media thickness (IMT) measurements. Methods. Ultrasound examinations of common carotid artery were performed in 30 healthy subjects and 20 patients with diabetes mellitus. Carotid IT and IMT were measured at 10 mm, 13 mm, and 16 mm upstream from the carotid bulb. Each subject was scanned by three operators to evaluate inter-operator reproducibility. Each operator scanned the subjects twice to evaluate intra-operator repeatability. Inter-equipment reproducibility of the measurements was evaluated. Results. The inter-operator reproducibility for measuring carotid IT at the three sites was 81.5%, 81.9% and 69.1%, respectively, slightly lower than carotid IMT measurement (89.7%, 86.5%, 75.2%, respectively). The intra-operator repeatability for carotid IT measurement at the three sites ranged 76.9–89.5%, 67.4–90.3%, and 55.2–70.5%, respectively, and was lower than for IMT measurement (86.5–96.9%, 87.6–95.7%, 79.9–86.5%, respectively). The inter-equipment reproducibility of IMT (75.7–86.6%) was slightly better than for IT measurement (71.4–75.9%). Conclusions. Ultrasonographic measurement of carotid IT is repeatable and reproducible, although not as good as IMT. Measurements preformed 10 mm to 13 mm upstream from the carotid bulb yield more repeatable and reproducible results. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 40:79–84, 2012

Anomalous origin of vertebral arteries is not common and usually seen as an incidental finding on imaging. We report a case of anomalous origin of left vertebral artery from left carotid bulb ("trifurcation" of left common carotid artery) on magnetic resonance angiography in a 64-year old male who also had ipsilateral thalamic acute infarct.

Black blood MRI is an attractive tool for monitoring normal and pathological wall thickening; however, limited spatial resolutions can conspire with complex vascular geometries to distort the appearance of the wall in ways hitherto unclear. To elucidate this, a thin-walled cylinder model was developed to predict the composite effects of obliqueness, in-plane resolution and voxel anisotropy on the accuracy of MRI-derived wall thickness measurements. These predictions were validated by means of imaging of a thin-walled carotid bifurcation phantom. Typical thick-slice axial acquisitions were found to result in artifactual wall thickening at the carotid bulb, owing to its obliqueness to the nominal imaging plane. Obliqueness was less problematic for near-isotropic resolutions; however, the obligatory reduction of in-plane resolution served to inflate wall thicknesses uniformly by up to 50%. Moreover, the nonlinear relationship between wall thickness and its overestimation served to mask genuine differences in wall thickness, an effect predicted to be worse for thinner coronary artery walls and plaque caps. Therefore, care must be taken when interpreting black blood MRI wall thickness measurements in the presence—or absence—of observed differences within or between individuals. Magn Reson Med 60:1020–1028, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Summary Background and purpose B-mode measurement of the carotid intima-media (IM) thickness (T) based on manual tracing (MT) procedures are dependent on the subjectivity of the reader and the existing automatic tracing procedures often fail to detect the IM boundaries accurately. The purpose of this study was to compare the tracing results of the IM boundaries of the carotid wall with a new automatic identification (AI) procedure, based on an active contour model, and computer-assisted manual tracing (MT). Methods The detection of the IM boundaries was performed with both procedures in 126 ultrasound images [63 each of the common carotid artery (CCA) and carotid bulb] along the far wall of the distal CCA and the carotid bulb. Intra- and inter-reader variability for mean and maximum IMT with AI and MT and accuracy of identification of both IM boundaries were evaluated. Results Using MT the intra- and inter-reader variability amounted to 0AE01‐0AE03 and 0AE03‐0AE07 mm, respectively. The variability was slightly higher in the carotid bulb than in the CCA. Using AI the variability was almost eliminated. Mean and maximum IMT were measured systematically lower by AI compared with MT in all regions by 0AE01 mm. The accuracy of identification was similar for both IM boundaries, but lower in the carotid bulb region than in the CCA. Conclusions The new AI procedure identifies both IM boundaries in the region of the far wall of the CCA and carotid bulb with high precision, and eliminates most of the intra- and inter-reader variability of the IMT measurement using MT.

Whereas International Headache society (IHS) criteria of carotidynia were defined in 1988, its validity as a distinct nosological entity has recently been questioned, leading this entity to be removed from the second IHS classification in 2004. We report the case of a 30-year-old woman who developed a pain located at the left carotid bulb, associated with typical findings on ultrasonography and MRI. We discuss new criteria and denomination of this clinical entity.

Small carotid body tumors that do not encircle the internal carotid artery are excised with relative ease and minimal risk by the conventional subadventicial approach. Large carotid body tumors frequently encircle the internal and external carotid arteries, and extensive bleeding often complicates the resection, increasing the risk of carotid artery rupture and damage to major cranial nerves. Recent improvements in surgical techniques and selective embolization have lessened the risks of surgical excision, decreased the blood loss, and diminished the time required for resection. Experiences in the resection of carotid tumors with and without embolization are compared. Early resection of carotid body tumors, before involvement of the internal carotid artery and carotid bulb, is advocated.