Search

Objective In the face of the ongoing circulation of SARS‐CoV‐2, the durability of neutralization post–COVID‐19 vaccination in immune‐mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) is a key issue, as are the effects of medications. Methods Adults (n = 112) with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis, and systemic lupus were recruited from participating Canadian medical centers from 2021 to 2023. We focused on log‐transformed neutralization (lentivirus methods) as a continuous outcome, with separate models for wild‐type and Omicron strains BA.1 and BA.5. Results Compared with 30 to 120 days postvaccination, subsequent periods were associated with greater neutralization in unadjusted models for wild‐type, BA.1, and BA.5 strains and against the BA.1 strain in adjusted models. Rituximab was associated with lower neutralization for the BA.1 strain in adjusted models, with a similar trend for BA.5. In methotrexate users, there were trends for less neutralization of BA.1 and BA.5 in all unadjusted models, whereas in adjusted models, there was significantly lower neutralization only for the wild type. Three or more doses and Omicron‐specific vaccines were both independently associated with better neutralization ability for all three strains. A COVID‐19 infection within six months before sampling was associated with higher neutralization of wild type and BA.1 in adjusted analyses. Anti–tumor necrosis factor agents were associated with lower neutralization ability for BA.5 in adjusted analyses. Conclusion Neutralization responses in immunosuppressed individuals with IMID were durable over time and were augmented by more than three doses and Omicron‐specific vaccines. Less neutralization was seen with certain medications. Our work clarifies the joint effects of vaccine history, infection, and medications on COVID‐19 immunity.

Objective Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may present with more tender than swollen joints, which can persist. Elevated tender‐swollen joint difference (TSJD) is often challenging, because there may be multiple causes and it may contribute to overestimating disease activity. Little is known about the phenotype and impact of TSJDs on patient function. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of TSJD on functional outcomes in early RA and to see whether associations vary by joint size. Methods Data were from patients with active, early RA (≤12 months) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, who completed assessments of general function (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ]), upper extremity (UE) function (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders [Neuro‐QoL] UE scale), and work/activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment RA) over their first year of follow‐up. A total of 28 joint counts were performed. TSJDs were calculated. Adjusted associations between TSJDs and functional outcomes were estimated in separate multivariable linear mixed effects models. Separate analyses were performed for large‐ versus small‐joint TSJD. Results Patients (N = 547) were 70% female, mean age 56 (SD 15) years, mean disease duration 5.3 (SD 2.9) months. At baseline, 287 (52%) had TSJD >0 (43% involved large joints and 34% small joints), decreasing to 32% at 12 months. A one‐point increase in TSJD was significantly associated with worse function (MDHAQ: adjusted mean change 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08–0.13; Neuro‐QoL UE function T score: adjusted mean change −0.59, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.43; and greater work impairment: adjusted mean change 1.95%, 95% CI 0.85%–3.05%). Higher large‐joint TSJDs were associated with the worst functional outcomes. Conclusion Having more tender than swollen joints is common in early RA and is associated with worse function, most notably when involving large joints. Early identification and targeted intervention strategies may be needed.

Objective Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a higher risk for infections, including influenza and related complications. We identified influenza vaccination coverage in adults newly diagnosed with RA and examined sociodemographic RA characteristics and attitudes associated with vaccination. Methods We used data from patients enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort between September 2017 and February 2021. At enrollment, participants reported their vaccination status in the previous year and completed the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of vaccination in the year after RA diagnosis. Results The baseline analytic sample of 431 patients were mostly White (80%) women (67%) with a mean age of 56 (SD 14) years. Prediagnosis, influenza vaccine coverage was 38%, increasing to 46% post diagnosis in the longitudinal sample (n = 229). Participants with previous influenza vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 15.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.37‐36.90), on biologics or JAKs (OR 5.42; 95% CI 1.72‐17.03), and with a higher change in BMQ Necessity‐Concerns Differential scores (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02‐1.15) had greater odds, whereas women (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14‐0.71), participants with a non‐White racial background (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04‐0.51), and participants currently smoking (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02‐0.37) had lower odds of influenza vaccine coverage. Conclusion Influenza vaccination coverage in patients with early RA remains below national targets in adults living with a chronic condition. Discussing vaccine history and medication attitudes at initial clinic visits with new patients with RA may enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.

Objective To describe patterns of glucocorticoid use in a large real‐world cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and assess the impact on disease activity and treatment. Methods Data are from adults with new RA (≤1 year) recruited to the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) and are stratified on the basis of whether a person was prescribed oral glucocorticoids within 3 months of study entry. Disease activity was compared over 24 months. Mixed‐effects logistic regression was used for adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of escalation to biologics separately for 12 and 24 months, with random effects terms to account for prescribing patterns clustering by study site. Results Among 1891 persons, 30% received oral steroids. Users were older, were less often employed, and had shorter disease duration and higher disease activity. Disease activity improved over time, with early glucocorticoid users starting at higher levels of disease activity. Participants with early oral glucocorticoids were more likely to be on a biologic at 12 months (aOR = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐3.7) and 24 months (aOR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3‐3.0). Despite Canadian clinical practice guidelines to limit corticosteroid use to short‐term or ‘bridge’ therapy, 30% of patients who used oral glucocorticoids still used them 2 years later. Conclusion Early steroids were prescribed sparingly in CATCH and were often indicative of more active baseline disease as well as the need for progression to biologics.

Objective In this study, we aimed to determine the lifetime prevalence of substance use disorder (SUD) in a Canadian rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cohort and factors associated with SUD in RA. Methods Participants with RA (N = 154) were recruited via rheumatology clinics as part of a larger cohort study of psychiatric comorbidity in immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases. SUD is defined as the uncontrolled use of a substance despite the harmful consequences of its use. To identify lifetime SUD, the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition was administered to participants. Participants’ sociodemographic and RA clinical characteristics were also assessed. We examined factors associated with lifetime SUD using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression modeling. Results Twenty‐three (14.9%) of 154 participants with RA met the criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of SUD. The majority of the participants were women, were White, had postsecondary education, and were on a disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug. Factors associated with increased odds of SUD were male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03‐12.73), younger age (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90‐0.98), and ever smoking (aOR: 6.44, 95% CI: 1.53‐27.07). Conclusion We found that approximately 1 in 7 individuals with RA had a lifetime diagnosis of SUD, highlighting the importance of identifying and treating SUD in those with RA. In particular, the following factors were associated with higher odds of SUD: male sex, younger age, and smoking behaviors.