Search

Background and aims Within the context of busy clinical settings, health-care providers need practical, evidence-based options to engage smokers in quitting. Sampling of nicotine replacement therapy [i.e. provision of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT starter kits)] is a brief, pragmatic strategy to address this need. We aimed to compare the effects of NRT sampling plus standard care (SC), relative to SC alone, provided by primary care providers during routine clinic visits. Design Cluster-randomized clinical trial. Setting Twenty-two primary care clinics in South Carolina, USA. Participants Adult smokers [n = 1245; 61% female, mean age = 50.7, standard deviation (SD) = 13.5] both motivated and unmotivated to quit, seen during routine clinical visit. Interventions were provider-delivered SC (n = 652, 12 clinics) cessation advice or SC + a 2-week supply of both nicotine patch and lozenge, with minimal instructions on use (n = 593; 10 clinics). Measurements The primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 6-month follow-up, using intent-to-treat. Additional outcomes included NRT use and quit attempts, assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months following baseline. Findings Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates were significantly higher in the NRT sampling group throughout follow-up, including at 6 months [12 versus 8%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0-2.4]. NRT sampling increased prevalence of any use of NRT (65 versus 25%, OR = 5.8, 95% CI = 4.3-7.7), with higher prevalence of use at 6 months (25 versus 14%, OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.5-2.7). NRT sampling increased the rate of quit attempts in the initial month (24 versus 18%, OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.3) but had no significant effect on overall rate of quit attempts (48 versus 45%, OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8-1.7). Conclusion Providing smokers with a free 2-week starter kit of nicotine replacement therapy increased quit attempts, use of stop smoking medications and smoking abstinence compared with standard care in a primary care setting.

A quantitative survey was completed by 103 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 59 cardiologists who regularly prescribed β-blockers to assess knowledge and use of this heterogeneous drug class for hypertension. More cardiologists than PCPs chose β-blockers as initial antihypertensive therapy (30% vs 17%, P < 0.01). Metoprolol and carvedilol were the most commonly prescribed β-blockers. Cardiologists rated "impact on energy" and "arterial vasodilation" as more important than PCPs (P < 0.05/

Measure Accurately, Act Rapidly, and Partner With Patients (MAP) is an evidence‐based protocol implemented to improve hypertension control in a clinic for underserved patients (49.9% Medicaid and 50.2% black). Patients with hypertension seen during the year before intervention and with at least one visit during the 6‐month intervention (N = 714) were included. If initial attended blood pressure (BP; standard aneroid manometer) was ≥140/≥90 mm Hg, unattended automated office BP was measured in triplicate and averaged (Measure Accurately) using an Omron HEM‐907XL. When automated office BP was ≥140/≥90 mm Hg, Act Rapidly included intensification of antihypertensive medications, assessed by therapeutic inertia. Partner With Patients included BP self‐monitoring, reducing pill burden, and minimizing medication costs, which was assessed by systolic BP change per therapeutic intensification. Between baseline and the last study visit, BP control to

To optimize the translation of clinical trial evidence that antihypertensive treatment reduces recurrent stroke risk into clinical practice, it is important to assess the frequency of long-term antihypertensive drug persistence after stroke and identify the factors associated with low persistence. Structured telephone interviews to determine antihypertensive regimen persistence 1-year post-stroke hospitalization were conducted in 270 stroke survivors, of which 212 (78.5%) were discharged on antihypertensive therapy (two thirds on >1 drug class). Continued use of any antihypertensive agent at 1 year of follow-up was relatively high (87.3%); however, persistence on all or two or more drug classes prescribed at discharge was relatively low (38.7%). Continued use varied by drug class, with the highest rates among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (69.1%) and the lowest rates among diuretic (24.4%) users. Black patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.78) and those with a high comorbidity burden (adjusted odds ratio , 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.86) were less likely to exhibit persistence on prescribed treatments 1-year post-stroke hospitalization. These results indicate the need for further study to identify appropriate persistence of antihypertensive therapies for secondary stroke prevention and to investigate reasons for racial disparities in persistence on prescribed treatments in a real-world clinical setting.

Community-based practice networks for research and improving the quality of care are growing in size and number but have variable success rates. In this paper, the authors review recent efforts to initiate a community-based hypertension network modeled after the successful Outpatient Quality Improvement Network (O'QUIN) project, located at the Medical University of South Carolina. Key lessons learned and new directions to be explored are highlighted.

The common assumption is that blood pressure (BP) will decrease on subsequent readings. The objective of this study is to examine the prevalence and direction of BP classification change with repeat measurements and compare common clinical characteristics of groups of patients who do and do not have a change in BP classification. A nationally representative subsample of 1725 adolescents aged 13 to 18 years from the National Health and Nutrition Survey were analyzed. Three BP measurements were obtained. Patients were classified based on the first and the average of 3 BP measurements as having normal BP, hypertension, and/or prehypertension. Of the 1725 adolescents, 1569 (90.9%) maintained BP classification, 107 (6.2%) had a reduction in their classification, and 49 (2.9%) had an increase in their classification. Comparing the two groups that changed BP classification to the group without change, C‐reactive protein and body mass index (BMI) z score were significantly higher in the groups that had a change in BP classification (P=.02 and

This paper examines baseline characteristics from a prospective, cluster-randomized trial in 32 primary care offices. Offices were first stratified by percentage of minorities and level of clinical pharmacy services and then randomized into 1 of 3 study groups. The only differences between randomized arms were for marital status (P=.03) and type of insurance coverage (P

Prevalent hypertension in National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) is traditionally defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mm Hg systolic and/or ≥90 diastolic and/or currently taking antihypertensive medications. When estimating prevalent hypertension, American Heart Association (AHA) statistical updates include the traditional definition of hypertension (tHTN) and untreated individuals with nonhypertensive BP told twice that they were hypertensive (nontraditional [ntHTN]). The characteristics of ntHTN and their impact on the clinical epidemiology of hypertension and Healthy People prevention and control goals are undefined. NHANES 1999-2002, 2003-2006, and 2007-2010 were analyzed. The ntHTN group was younger and had less diabetes and lower BP than the tHTN group but higher BP than the normotensive group. When classifying ntHTN as hypertensive, prevalent hypertension increased approximately 3% and control 5% to 6% across NHANES periods. In 2007-2010, the Healthy People 2010 goal of controlling BP in 50% of all hypertensive patientss was attained when ntHTN was classified as hypertension (56.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.2-58.7]) and nonhypertension (51.8% [95% CI, 49.6-53.9]). When including ntHTN in prevalent hypertension estimates, the Healthy People 2020 goal of controlling BP in 60% of hypertensive patients becomes more attainable, whereas reducing prevalent hypertension to 26.9% (31.8% [95% CI, 30.5-33.1]) vs 28.7% [95% CI, 27.5-30.0]) becomes more challenging.

Clinical guidelines recommend averaging ≥ 2 blood pressure (BP) measurements on each visit. Only one BP is measured on many clinical visits, especially if the value is

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012; 14:415–421. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The authors previously reported that addition of valsartan ameliorated the negative metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients through an enhanced postprandial insulin response. In this secondary analysis, the authors tested whether this enhanced insulin response to valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide was influenced by serum potassium levels, which were reduced to a lesser extent, when compared with amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide. Results showed that the early insulin response with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide occurred regardless of serum potassium levels. Heightened insulin response was, however, not significantly different when patients with normal potassium (>3.9 mEq/L) at baseline and low potassium (≤3.9 mEq/L) at the end of the study were compared with the amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide group. Despite the influence of serum potassium on insulin secretory response to a glucose challenge, the addition of valsartan maintained normoglycemia in patients given hydrochlorothiazide. Thus, the metabolic response to hydrochlorothiazide was improved with addition of valsartan through an enhanced insulin response that was not greatly affected by changes in potassium levels.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is a major cardiovascular risk factor yet control rates remain suboptimal. Thus, improving recognition, treatment, and control of HTN by focusing on novel populations such as hospitalized patients is warranted. Current consensus guidelines do not address inpatient HTN, and little is known about HTN prevalence or patterns of care in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of English-language studies published in 1976 or later that reported on HTN prevalence and care patterns among adult inpatients. We included MEDLINE-indexed randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies that: (1) reported estimates of the prevalence of HTN in the inpatient setting, and (2) used HTN diagnosis or treatment as a primary focus. We excluded randomized, controlled trials that recorded measures of inpatient blood pressure but whose focus was not HTN. RESULTS: We identified 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, and in those studies, HTN was highly prevalent among inpatients, ranging from 50.5% to 72%. Intensification of antihypertensive treatment was inconsistent, and 37% to 77% of hypertensive patients remained hypertensive at the time of discharge. Most patients with inpatient HTN continued to have elevated blood pressures at outpatient follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient HTN is prevalent and a large percentage of those with this condition remain hypertensive at the time of discharge and at follow-up. The potential exists for improved recognition and treatment of newly diagnosed and known, but uncontrolled, HTN observed in the inpatient setting. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2011. © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:731–738. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The authors evaluated the blood pressure (BP)–lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs amlodipine/HCTZ in a 16-week, double-blind, randomized, forced-titration study and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) substudy involving centrally obese hypertensive patients 40 years and older. Patients were started on valsartan/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg monotherapy, force-titrated at week 4 to valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg and HCTZ 25 mg, respectively. The HCTZ group initiated amlodipine 5 mg at week 8 and 10 mg at week 12. A subset of patients had 24-hour ABPM at baseline and weeks 8 and 16. At week 16 in the intent-to-treat population (n=401), valsartan/HCTZ and amlodipine/HCTZ lowered office systolic BP (−30.6 vs −28.3 mm Hg; P=.14). In the ABPM subgroup (n=111), valsartan/HCTZ was more effective than amlodipine/HCTZ in reducing 24-hour systolic BP (−20.6 vs −14.5 mm Hg; P=.011). In obese hypertensive patients, valsartan/HCTZ reduced office BP similar to amlodipine/HCTZ but lowered 24-hour systolic BP more. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). ****;**:**–**.

The Hypertension Initiative began in 1999 to help transition South Carolina from a leader in cardiovascular disease (CVD) to a model of heart and vascular health. Goals were to reduce heart disease and stroke by 50% by promoting healthy lifestyles and access to effective care and medications. Continuing medical education was used to train providers, encourage physicians to become American Society of Hypertension (ASH)-certified hypertension specialists and recruit practices into the community-based practice network (CBPN). Practice data audit with provider specific feedback is a key quality improvement tool. With ASH support, the CBPN has grown to 197 practices with approximately 1.6 million patients (approximately 700,000 hypertensives). Clinical data are obtained from electronic health records and quarterly provider feedback reports are generated. Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes control rose and South Carolina's ranking improved from 51st to 35th in CVD mortality from 1995 to 2006. The Hypertension Initiative expanded to the Outpatient Quality Improvement Network (O'QUIN) to encompass comparative effectiveness research and other chronic diseases. Lessons learned include: trust enables success, addressing practice priorities powers participation, infrastructure support must be multilateral, and strategic planning identifies opportunities and pitfalls. A collaborative practice network is attainable that produces positive, sustainable, and growing impacts on cardiovascular and other chronic diseases.

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:517–522. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. An increased focus on hypertension prevention and control, especially in high-risk populations, may have a substantial impact on cardiovascular health outcomes. A continuing medical education (CME) program trained primary care providers in evidence-based guidelines for hypertension prevention and control. This study evaluated its effectiveness in reducing patients’ blood pressure for the sessions occurring from 2003 to 2007. Using the Hypertension Initiative Database, 8183 patients of CME providers (CME patients) were paired with controls and changes in blood pressure, provider visits, prescription months, and the proportion of patients with blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg), the changes in blood pressure were similar in magnitude to those in the entire population. The CME program, by promoting evidence-based practice, improves patients’ blood pressure and could serve as a positive model for future hypertension interventions.

Aliskiren is the first direct renin inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) control in stage 2 hypertension with aliskiren monotherapy has not been reported. This was a post hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension (baseline mean sitting systolic BP [msSBP]≥160 mmHg) who completed the 12-week monotherapy phase of a 6-month, double-blind, randomized study. A total of 175 patients were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n = 88) or ramipril 5 mg (n = 87) with optional up-titration to aliskiren 300 mg or ramipril 10 mg, respectively, at weeks 6 and 12. In the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension, aliskiren lowered msSBP and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) by 22.3/12.7 mmHg from baseline to week 12; compared with a reduction of 18.1/10.2 mmHg with ramipril. The maximum BP reductions achieved with aliskiren were 60.0/34.0 mmHg (from a baseline of 172.7/107.3 mmHg). Aliskiren was noninferior (P < 0.0001) to ramipril for SBP reduction with nonsignificant superiority (P = 0.052), and superior (P = 0.043) to ramipril for DBP reduction. The proportion of patients who achieved BP control (

The Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) demonstrated the feasibility of possibly reducing the incidence of hypertension with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan compared with placebo. The long-term benefits of pharmacologic therapy in high-normal blood pressure, or prehypertension are not known, and the long-term effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL) has not been determined. An analysis of covariance model was used to assess treatment differences from baseline in the HRQL scores using Short Form (SF)-36, and component measures at subsequent visits. Of the 809 randomized patients, 734 had both baseline and > or =1 HRQL follow-up assessment: 95% (379 of 397) of patients receiving candesartan and 91% (355 of 388) of patients receiving placebo. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in least-squares mean physical component survey and mental component survey scores or the individual scales at each scheduled visit relative to baseline values (P >.05). In TROPHY, patients with prehypertension had relatively high baseline HRQL, and HRQL was maintained with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan over both the 2-year treatment period and a total 4-year trial period.

More than 1 medication is required in many hypertensive patients to reach blood pressure (BP) goals, and initial treatment with 2 agents has been recommended for patients whose BP level is >20/10 mm Hg above target. Diuretics reduce BP levels and the incidence of target organ complications and together with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers, which are recommended in patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, or diabetes, are effective antihypertensive combinations. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are also effective antihypertensive agents, and evidence suggests that a CCB/ACEI combination is well tolerated and also decreases the risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. Some evidence suggests that this combination may improve endothelial function more than either agent alone, and its use could potentially lead to better cardiovascular outcomes than a diuretic/ACEI or diuretic/ARB combination. The ongoing Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial compares these 2 effective combinations (ie, an ACEI/diuretic and ACEI/CCB) as initial treatment for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in older high‐risk hypertensive patients. The results of this trial, when reported, should help to clarify the relative benefits of these different therapies.

The prevalence of hypertension dictates that blood pressure must be managed effectively in primary care. The American Society of Hypertension (ASH) regional chapters and clinical hypertension specialists represent a positive response by ASH to the growing problems of hypertension and metabolic syndrome-related risks and disease. To have a significant public health effect, the impact of clinical hypertension specialists must be leveraged. Key activities in the community include educating other providers locally, delivering care for complex referral patients, and fostering growth of a practice network with a central database in collaboration with academic partners. The database supports practice audit and feedback reports to enhance quality improvement, identify continuing medical education topics, and facilitate clinical trials to test new therapeutic and best-practice approaches to risk factor management. The ASH regional chapters serve as a forum for community and academic hypertension specialists to collaborate with like-minded individuals and organizations. The collaboration among the ASH Carolinas-Georgia chapter, the Hypertension Initiative, and the Community Physicians' Network provides a model for other ASH chapters and health delivery groups to partner in delivering continuing medical education programs focused on cardiovascular risk factor management, recruiting practices into the network, and developing and maintaining a centralized patient database. Evidence suggests that this collaboration is facilitating application of evidence-based medicine and risk factor control.

The objective of this study was to determine whether 3 months of treatment with extended-release metoprolol succinate would reduce C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Seventy-five patients aged 30-65 years with uncontrolled hypertension were treated with extended-release metoprolol at 25-50 mg, titrated up to 100-200 mg daily. CRP was evaluated at baseline and at 1 and 3 months. In the 61 hypertensive patients who completed the study, CRP decreased from 6.2+/-7.5 mg/L at baseline to 5.4+/-7.0 mg/L (p=0.03) at 1 month and showed no further change at 3 months (5.6+/-6.5 mg/L; p=0.13). The 13 patients who received 200 mg of extended-release metoprolol had a 32% decline in CRP from 7.0+/-9.0 mg/L to 4.8+/-6.6 mg/L (-2.2 mg/L) (p=0.005) over the 3-month period, whereas lower doses did not reduce CRP (p0.05). Age, race, sex, and change in blood pressure were not related to the reduction in CRP in multivariate analysis. If CRP evolves into a confirmed modifiable risk factor, a beta blocker such as metoprolol may be a useful addition to pharmacotherapy options.

This article highlights the proceedings of a symposium presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Santa Barbara, CA, on June 28, 2005, organized and chaired by Peter Miller. The presentations included (1) Screening for Alcohol Use Disorders in Surgical and Trauma Patients, presented by Claudia Spies; (2) Are Serum Levels of %CDT and GGT Related to Severity of Liver Biopsy Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Steatohepatitis in Patients with Hepatitis C? by Martin Javors; (3) Biochemical Alcohol Screening in the Treatment of Hypertension, presented by Peter Miller; and (4) The Cost-Effectiveness of a New Biomarker, CDT, in a Primary Care Sample, by Michael Fleming. Presentations were discussed by Raymond Anton.

Platelet and white blood cell counts are higher among some insulin-resistant patients and may contribute to atherothromboembolic complications. Metabolic syndrome patients are insulin resistant, often hypertensive, and at high cardiovascular disease risk, yet the relationship of platelets to the metabolic syndrome is unknown. Platelet and white blood cell counts were obtained from 135 volunteers who had measurements of blood pressure, fasting triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose. A body mass index >30 kg/m2 served as a surrogate for increased waist circumference. Subjects were subdivided into three groups by the number of metabolic syndrome criteria, i.e., no metabolic syndrome risk factor (MS-0; n = 40), one or two metabolic syndrome risk factors (MS1-2; n = 61), and three to five metabolic syndrome risk factors (MS3-5; n = 34). Platelet counts were increased significantly from 226+/-8 to 257+/-8 and 276+/-10 (x10(3)/mm3) in the MS-0, MS1-2, and MS3-5 groups, respectively (p < 0.01), after adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. White blood cell counts were also increased across the three groups (5.4+/-0.2, 6.2+/-0.2, and 6.6+/-0.3 [x10(3)/mm3]; p < 0.01) after multivariate adjustment. Compared with patients with zero to two metabolic syndrome risk factors, metabolic syndrome patients have higher platelet and white blood counts, which may serve as markers of a prothrombotic and proinflammatory state and contributors to atherothromboembolic risk.

Among diabetic hypertensive patients, ethnic differences in blood pressure control and outcomes have been attributed in part to greater reluctance of providers to prescribe combination antihypertensive regimens to African Americans than to Caucasians. African Americans purportedly receive fewer angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which reduce target organ complications. To assess these issues, cross‐sectional data were analyzed from 19,864 diabetic hypertensives from 62 primary care clinics. Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans (N=6230) were less likely than Caucasians (N=8041) to have blood pressure (BP) ≤130/80 mm Hg at their last clinic visit (23.1% [23.0%–23.2%] vs. 30.7% [30.6%–30.9%]) despite a greater number of prescriptions for antihypertensive medications (2.67 [2.63‐2.70] vs. 2.23 [2.20‐2.26]). African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to have an ACEI and/or ARB prescribed and to receive prescriptions for at least two antihypertensive medications that included an ACEI or ARB (64.1 % [63.8%–64.4%] vs. 53.1% [52.8%–53.4%]). Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans are less likely than Caucasians to attain BP

The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of C‐reactive protein (CRP) and blood pressure (BP) across the range of BP categories including prehypertension. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) data collected from 1988 to 1994 were analyzed. In unadjusted analyses, there was a step‐wise increase in the probability of elevated CRP across a wide range of BP categories. Prehypertensive participants had a higher prevalence of elevated CRP than normotensive people (27.4% vs. 19.8%; p

While the geographic and demographic disparities in the prevalence of hypertension have been recognized for decades, the reasons for these differences in disease risks remain unknown. The demographic and geographic patterns of hypertension are similar to those of low birth weight, giving support to the “Barker Hypothesis” which proposes a fetal origin of adult‐onset disease. In fact, ecologic and observational studies throughout the world have detected significant associations of low birth weight and increased risks of hypertension. Nonetheless, the mechanisms for the association have not been fully described and documented. With some supportive evidence, proposed mechanisms include reduced nephrogenesis with a higher threshold for pressure natriuresis and greater susceptibility to progressive renal disease, impaired development of the endothelium, and increased sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Still, considerable work needs to be done to explain the birth weight/blood pressure relationship. The findings to date and the clinical significance warrant continued research in this intriguing area of study.

The effect of dietary sodium restriction on insulin, lipids, and blood pressure has been controversial. Evidence suggests that adverse short-term effects in response to very low-salt diets do not persist long-term with modest sodium restriction. In this study, the effects of modest dietary sodium restriction (60 and 120 mmol sodium) were measured for 3 weeks in 12 lean normotensives and 10 obese hypertensives. Blood pressure, plasma lipids, and the pressor response to an infusion of Intralipid and heparin were obtained. In contrast to previous reports concerning very low-salt diets, obese hypertensives did not manifest a pressor response or an adverse lipid effect with moderate salt restriction. Obese hypertensives were not more salt-sensitive than lean normotensives and did not manifest a different hemodynamic response to 4-hour infusion of Intralipid and heparin while on the 120-mmol/day salt diet. During the 60-mmol/day salt diet, however, plasma triglycerides increased more in obese than in lean volunteers during the Intralipid and heparin infusion (398+/-38 vs. 264+/-18 mg/dL; p

Hypertension and its complications are more frequent and occur about a decade earlier in life among high-risk groups, especially in the Southeast. Moreover, socioeconomic status is inversely related to hypertension and cardiovascular complications. Low-income, young and middle-aged adults living in the Southeast may be at especially high risk. Data on inpatient admissions among hypertensive Medicaid beneficiaries living in this region may provide insights on the burden of hypertension-related disease and on opportunities for successful intervention. A study of hospitalization rates and costs among 44,440 hypertensive Medicaid beneficiaries in South Carolina from 1993-1996 showed that 16,883 (38%) were continuously enrolled in Medicaid. Of this group, 63% were African American and 74% were women. Among the continuously enrolled patients, 7637, or about 45%, were hospitalized during the 4-year period. These 7637 individuals accounted for 20,698 hospital admissions, i.e., 2.7 admissions per person, over the 4-year interval. Nearly two thirds of the hospitalizations included a cardiovascular or renal diagnosis. Hospital claims paid reached nearly $90 million for the 7637 hypertensive Medicaid recipients during the 4-year period. Among patients discharged from the hospital with congestive heart failure, 33% filled a prescription for an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor within 90 days; 13% of patients discharged with an acute myocardial infarction filled a prescription for a beta blocker within 90 days. The data confirm that hypertensive Medicaid beneficiaries in the Southeast are hospitalized at high rates. Cardiovascular and renal morbidity account for the majority of the inpatient admissions. The findings suggest that the application of evidence-based guidelines would improve health, avoid cost, and reduce racial disparities in health outcomes.

The authors assessed the practicality and results of forced titrating of blood pressure to

The risk of hypertension and related target organ damage is much greater in African Americans than in Caucasians. The risk of hypertensive end-stage renal disease is approximately five-fold higher in African Americans. Many studies have shown that low birth weight is strongly associated with increased risk of hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction. However, until recently the relationship between birth weight and hypertension-related diseases was not clearly established in African Americans. Moreover, it was also unclear if low birth weight in humans heightened the risk for end-stage renal disease. This is a critical gap in the literature, since low birth weight occurs at twice the rate in African Americans as among Caucasians. We identified a significant relationship between end-stage renal disease and low birth weight in both African Americans and Caucasians. Given the higher rates of low birth weight in African Americans, differences in fetal development may, therefore, contribute to the racial disparity in end-stage renal disease. Continued study of the biological factors linking early development with later risk of hypertension-related diseases is important and may shed light on racial disparities in health outcomes. (c)2001 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc.