1. An audit of the results of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of mammography versus ultrasound screen-detected breast lesions
- Author
-
Eun Sook Ko, Sun Jung Rhee, Eun Young Ko, Ji Soo Choi, and Boo-Kyung Han
- Subjects
Core needle ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Screen detected ,business.industry ,Breast imaging ,Ultrasound ,BI-RADS ,Malignancy ,medicine.disease ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Mammography ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the malignancy rate of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB) for screen-detected breast lesions and to evaluate the results according to the mode of detection of the target lesions. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 703 consecutive women who underwent US-CNB for screen-detected breast lesions at a single tertiary hospital. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories and histopathological results of the target lesions were assessed. The cases were divided into two groups: the mammography-based detected lesions (M-group) and the US-based detected lesions (U-group). The biopsy performances of the two groups were compared using the χ2 test. RESULTS The malignancy rate in the entire population was 22.0%: 0.8%, 12.3%, 65.2%, 89.3%, and 94.6% in BI-RADS categories 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5, respectively. The malignancy rate was significantly higher in the M-group (54.1% [79/146]) than in the U-group (13.6% [76/557]) (p < 0.001). BI-RADS category 3 was the most common assessment overall that led to a US-CNB (362/703, 51.5%) and the rate of BI-RADS category 3 diagnoses that led to US-CNB was significantly higher in the U-group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The malignancy rate associated with US-CNB for screen-detected breast lesions was 22.0%. The breast lesions detected by mammography have a higher malignancy rate than those detected by US. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:261-266, 2017.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF