Search

ZAMPIERON A., BUJA A., DORIGO M., BONSO O. & CORSO M. (2012) A comparison of student motivation in selecting bachelors of nursing or paediatric nursing at an Italian university. International Nursing Review Aim: To investigate students' reasons for choosing general or paediatric nursing, and to compare motivation factors and personal characteristics between the two professions. Background: In Italy, nursing students can choose between two distinct career paths: general and paediatric nursing. However, it is unclear what factors motivate a student to choose between these two pathways. Methods: A cross-sectional approach was used to compare a sample of general and paediatric nursing students enrolled in a university in northeast Italy. We administered a questionnaire that covered socio-demographic characteristics and included an instrument of motivation developed by Zysberg & Berry to 224 students enrolled in the 3-year classes. Results: We analysed 215 questionnaires (96%). Paediatric nurses were generally younger, had attended a college preparatory high school and had previously failed another university programme. Many students, in both groups, had a relative who was a nurse, or had cared for a sick friend or family member. Students did not vary significantly in how they evaluated items included in the questionnaire. Conclusion: A career in nursing should be advised for students who are motivated to help other people. Paediatric nursing was identified as an acceptable career choice by students of college preparatory high schools or by students who had initially enrolled in a different university programme. General nursing was a satisfactory choice by students with previous work experience.

MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL. Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty-two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non-PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42%). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non-PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85%, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18-month follow-up, 27 patients (84%) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85%, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non-PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow-up. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 137-144, February 2012)

Impact of the Systematic Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava. Background: Pulmonary veins (PVs) have been shown to represent the most frequent sites of ectopic beats initiating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, additional non-PV triggers, arising from different areas, have been reported as well. One of the most common non-PV sites described is the superior vena cava. Aims: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact resulting from the systematic isolation of the superior vena cava (SVCI) in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF ablation. Methods: A total of 320 consecutive patients who had been referred to our center in order to undergo a first attempt of AF ablation were randomized into 2 groups. Group I (160 patients) underwent PVAI only; Group II (160 patients) underwent PVAI and SVCI. Results: AF was paroxysmal in 134 (46%), persistent in 75 (23%), and permanent in 111 (31%) of said patients. SVCI was performed on 134 of the 160 patients (84%) in Group II. SVC isolation was not performed on the remaining 26 patients either because of phrenic nerve capture or the lack of SVC potentials. Comparison of the outcome data between the 2 groups, after a follow-up of 12 months, revealed a significant difference in total procedural success solely with patients manifesting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (56/73 [77%] Group I vs. 55/61 [90%] Group II; P = 0.04; OR 2.78). Conclusions: In our study, the strategy of the empiric SVCI in addition to PVAI has improved the outcome of AF ablation solely in patients manifesting paroxysmal AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1–5, January 2010)

Aims: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The outcome of AF ablation in septuagenarians is not clear. Our aim was to evaluate success rate, outcome, and complication rate of AF ablation in septuagenarians. Methods and Results: We collected data from 174 consecutive patients over 75 years of age who underwent AF ablation from 2001 to 2006. AF was paroxysmal in 55%. High-risk CHADS score (≥2) was present in 65% of the population. Over a mean follow-up of 20 ± 14 months, 127 (73%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) with a single procedure, whereas 47 patients had recurrence of AF. Twenty of them had a second ablation, successful in 16 (80%). Major acute complications included one CVA and one hemothorax (2/194 [1.0%]). During the follow-up, three patients had a CVA within the first 6 weeks after ablation. Warfarin was discontinued in 138 out 143 patients (96%) who maintained SR without AADs with no embolic event occurring over a mean follow-up of 16 ± 12 months. Conclusion: AF ablation is a safe and effective treatment for AF in septuagenarians.

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia associated withsignificantmorbidityandmortality.Preventionofrecurrenceswith antiarrhythmic drugs is usually poorly effective over thelong term; in addition it carries the risk of serious side effectsincluding proarrhythmia. This has stimulated the develop-ment of new more effective and really curative treatments.Among these, radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fib-rillationhasgainedagrowingpopularityinthelastfewyears.Sincethefirstreportin1994

Slow pathway ablation in common AVNRT can be complicated by total AV block. When radiofrequency energy is delivered to the posterior aspect of the triangle of Koch, total AV block may be the consequence of the absence of anterograde conduction along the fast pathway or of inadvertent damage to a fast pathway abnormally located close to the slow pathway. To localize the anterogradely conducting fast pathway, the triangle of Koch was pacemapped in 72 patients who underwent the ablation of common AVNRT. In all cases, before ablation the St-H interval was calculated by stimulating the anteroseptal (AS), mid-septal (MS), and posteroseptal (PS) aspect of the triangle of Koch at a rate slightly faster than the sinus rate. In all patients, common AVNRT was induced. In 64 (89%) of 72 patients (group A) the shortest St-H interval was recorded on stimulating the AS region. In six (8%) patients (group B) the shortest St-H interval was recorded on stimulating the MS region. Finally, in two (3%) patients (group C) the shortest St-H interval was recorded stimulating in the PS region. In group C, AH interval, calculated on stimulating in the AS region, was significantly longer than in patients of groups A and B (200 +/- 99 ms vs 64 +/- 18 and 62 +/- 3, respectively). In group A, on stimulating in the AS, MS, and PS regions, the AH interval remained constant in all patients. In contrast, in groups B and C on stimulation in the MS and PS regions, AH interval shortened (in group B from 56 +/- 8 to 27 +/- 37 and 37 +/- 14, respectively; in group C from 200 +/- 99 to 170 +/- 100 and to 137 +/- 109, respectively). In groups A and B, a posteroseptal slow pathway, and in group C, an anteroseptal retrograde fast pathway were successfully ablated without AV block. Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch can help to recognize patients in whom the anterograde conducting fast pathway is abnormally located far from the anteroseptal region or in whom anterograde conduction of the fast pathway is absent. In these cases the risk of AV block can be reduced by performing slow pathway ablation in a site sufficiently far from the site of the anterograde fast pathway or ablating the retrogradely conducting fast pathway.

Introduction: Balloon-based catheters are an emerging technology in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, which aim to achieve consistent and rapid ablation encirclement of pulmonary veins (PVs). Recent emphasis has been placed on achieving more proximal electrical isolation within the PV–left atrial (LA) junction. We sought to evaluate the precise anatomic level of PV electrical disconnection with current design balloon-based catheters. Methods and Results: Thirteen patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing balloon catheter ablation with the endoscopic laser system (CardioFocus) or the high frequency-focused ultrasound system (ProRhythm) underwent electroanatomic mapping (EAM) of the left atrium. Intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) imaging was used for visualization of the position of the balloon catheter during energy delivery. Detailed point analysis of the location of electrical disconnection was then documented on EAM and with ICE. Successful electrical isolation was achieved in all 52 PVs. Despite ICE imaging confirming balloon catheter position at the antrum of the PVs, the location of electrical disconnection was demonstrated to be at or near the tubular ostium of the PVs on EAM and on ICE in all patients. Conclusion: Current generation balloon-based catheter ablation achieves electrical isolation distal in the LA–PV junction. This may limit the results of such systems in treating nonparoxysmal forms of atrial fibrillation.