Search

Relapse constitutes the greatest threat to event-free survival after completion of treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). However, evidence on optimal follow-up schedules is limited. The aims of the present population-based cohort study were to assess the value of current follow-up schedules after completion of Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology ALL protocol treatment and to estimate the impact of relapse detection mode on overall survival (OS). Among 3262 patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2014 and who completed treatment, 338 developed a relapse. Relapse detection was equally distributed between extra visits (50·8%) and scheduled follow-up visits (49·2%). All cases detected at an extra visit and 64·3% of cases detected at a scheduled visit presented with symptoms or objective findings. Neither the mode of detection {adjusted hazard ratio 0·95, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·61-1·48] for scheduled visits} nor the duration of symptoms was an independent risk factor for OS after relapse. The estimated number of scheduled blood samples needed to diagnose one subclinical relapse during the first 5 years after treatment cessation was 1269 (95% CI 902-1637). In conclusion, based on OS data, scheduled visits after cessation of therapy seem to yield no extra benefit. These results should frame future follow-up strategies.

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. To assess the effect of the number of PEG-asparaginase doses on survival and relapse in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Secondary objectives To assess the association between the number of doses of PEG-asparaginase and asparaginase-associated toxicities (e.g. hypersensitivity, thromboembolism, pancreatitis and osteonecrosis). To undertake a network meta-analysis (NMA) at dose-level in order to generate rankings of the number of doses of PEG-asparaginase used in the treatment for ALL, according to their benefits (survival and relapse) and harms (toxicity).

When offered participation in clinical trials, families of children with cancer face a delicate balance between cure and toxicity. Since parents and children may perceive this balance differently, this paper explores whether adolescent patients have different enrollment patterns compared to younger children in trials with different toxicity profiles.

Background L-Asparaginase is an effective drug in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The use of L-asparaginase may be limited by serious adverse events of which allergy is the most frequent. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical aspects of PEG-asparaginase allergy in children treated according to the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 protocol. Procedure Children (1–17 years) enrolled in the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol between July 2008 and August 2011, who developed PEG-asparaginase allergy were identified through the NOPHO ALL2008 toxicity registry. In the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol, patients are randomized to 8 or 15 doses of intramuscular PEG-asparaginase (Oncaspar®) 1,000 IU/m2/dose administered at 2 or 6 weeks intervals during a total period of 30 weeks. (Clinical trials.gov no: NCT00819351). Results Of 615 evaluable patients, 79 patients developed clinical PEG-asparaginase allergy (cumulative risk; 13.2%) and discontinued PEG-asparaginase therapy for that reason. PEG-asparaginase allergy occurred after a median of two doses (75% range 2–4, max 14). In 58% of PEG-asparaginase hypersensitive patients, the clinical allergic reactions appeared within 2 hr after PEG-asparaginase administration and ranged from mild symptoms to systemic anaphylaxis. Nine patients experienced an anaphylactic reaction within 1 hr and 50 min from asparaginase administration; none were fatal. Four of 68 patients (6%) who subsequently received Erwinase therapy also reacted allergic to Erwinase. Conclusion Clinical allergy to PEG-asparaginase occurred early in treatment, was in general moderate in severity, and mostly developed within 2 hr after PEG-asparaginase administration. The risk of subsequent Erwinase allergic reactions was low. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:427–433. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background To evaluate if dissolution of asparaginase in lidocaine can relieve pain of an intramuscular injection in children without changes in bioavailability. Procedure The study was designed as a double-blinded study, randomizing 12 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to four different combinations of injections, including two injections where asparaginase was dissolved in a lidocaine solution and two in sterile water. Seventeen treatment courses of asparaginase, each consisting of four injections, were evaluated. Pain intensity (Pain Visual Analog Scale, VAS-score) and pharmacokinetics of the drug was evaluated. Results The pain scores showed a significant difference between the two solutions of asparaginase (±lidocaine) (P value

Background Determination of the frequency of antibody formation during first and second exposure to Erwinia asparaginase after i.v. and i.m. administration. Procedure Thirty-nine children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were included in this prospective study. Antibodies were determined (ELISA method) in plasma from these patients on specific days during and after therapy with 30,000 IU/m2 i.v. or i.m. every day for ten days during the induction phase (first exposure). For 19 children, antibodies were measured in plasma during and after the re-induction phase (second exposure) following treatment with 30,000 IU/m2 i.v. or i.m. twice a week for two weeks (Mondays and Thursdays). On the same days of therapy, enzyme activity (spectrophotometric method) and the concentration of asparagine (HPLC) was determined. Results During the first exposure, none of the patients developed anti-Erwinia asparaginase antibodies. During the second exposure, one patient (1 of 8 patients) treated intravenously developed antibodies, which were associated with disappearance of enzyme activity and reappearance of asparagine. Three of eleven patients developed antibodies of pharmacokinetic importance after i.m. therapy. None of the children had any clinical symptoms of hypersensitivity. Conclusions The formation of antibodies and subsequently altered pharmacokinetics of Erwinia asparaginase seemed to be of importance only during a second period of asparaginase therapy. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 2002;38:310–316. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Aims Evaluation of l-asparaginase therapy in the NOPHO-92 ALL-protocol (treatment protocol of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia of the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, initiated in 1992) after intravenous and intramuscular administration of Erwinia asparaginase during induction and re-induction therapy. Methods Forty children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia received Erwinia asparaginase (30 000 IU/m2 i.v. or i.m.) during induction therapy (every day for 10 days), and 19 children received Erwinia asparaginase (30 000 IU/m2 i.v. or i.m.) during re-induction therapy (twice a week for 2 weeks). Within the treatment periods asparaginase trough activity (using a spectrophotometric assay) was determined on specific days. The goal of therapy is complete l-asparagine depletion, which asparaginase activities above 100 IU l−1 have been shown to ensure. Therefore determination of l-asparagine (using a h.p.l.c. method) was performed only in plasma samples with asparaginase activities below 100 IU l−1. Results During induction therapy 92.2% of the trough enzyme activities were above 500 IU l−1 for the i.v.-treated patients, and 92.4% of the trough enzyme activities were above 500 IU l−1 for the i.m.-treated patients. During re-induction therapy 64.7% of the trough enzyme activities were below 100 IU l−1 in the i.v.-treated group, and 73.3% of the trough enzyme activities were below 100 IU l−1 in the i.m.-treated group. For trough enzyme activities below 100 IU l−1l-asparagine depletion was complete in two thirds of the samples. Conclusions In the NOPHO-92 ALL-protocol l-asparaginase treatment during induction therapy was unnecessarily intense, but during the re-induction phase it appeared inadequate.