Search

Aim: The introduction of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) has become a major driver for global changes in species biogeography. We examined spatial patterns and temporal trends of ANS detections since 1965 to inform conservation policy and management.Location: Global. Methods: We assembled an extensive dataset of first records of detection of ANS (1965–2015) across 49 aquatic ecosystems, including the (a) year of first collection, (b) population status and (c) potential pathway(s) of introduction. Data were analysed at global and regional levels to assess patterns of detection rate, richness and trans-port pathways.Results: An annual mean of 43 (±16 SD) primary detections of ANS occurred—one new detection every 8.4 days for 50 years. The global rate of detections was rel-atively stable during 1965–1995, but increased rapidly after this time, peaking at roughly 66 primary detections per year during 2005–2010 and then declining marginally. Detection rates were variable within and across regions through time. Arthropods, molluscs and fishes were the most frequently reported ANS. Most ANS were likely introduced as stowaways in ships’ ballast water or biofouling, although direct evidence is typically absent.Main conclusions: This synthesis highlights the magnitude of recent ANS detections, yet almost certainly represents an underestimate as many ANS go unreported due to limited search effort and diminishing taxonomic expertise. Temporal rates of detec-tion are also confounded by reporting lags, likely contributing to the lower detection rate observed in recent years. There is a critical need to implement standardized, repeated methods across regions and taxa to improve the quality of global-scale comparisons and sustain core measures over longer time-scales. It will be fundamen-tal to fill in knowledge gaps given that invasion data representing broad regions of the world's oceans are not yet readily available and to maintain knowledge pipelines for adaptive management. Fil: Bailey, Sarah A.. Great Lakes Laboratory For Fisheries And Aquatic Scienc; Canadá Fil: Brown, Lyndsay. Marine Scotland Science; Reino Unido Fil: Campbell, Marnie L.. Deakin University; Australia Fil: Canning-Clode, João. Marine And Environmental Sciences Centre; Portugal Fil: Carlton, James T.. Williams College. Maritime Studies Program; Estados Unidos Fil: Castro, Nuno. Marine And Environmental Sciences Centre; Portugal Fil: Chainho, Paula. Marine And Environmental Sciences Centre; Portugal Fil: Chan, Farrah T.. Great Lakes Institute For Enviromental Research; Canadá Fil: Creed, Joel C.. Universidade do Estado de Rio do Janeiro; Brasil Fil: Curd, Amelia. Ifremer Institut Francais de Recherche Pour L'exploitation de la Mer; Francia Fil: Darling, John. United States Environmental Protection Agency; Estados Unidos Fil: Fofonoff, Paul. Smithsonian Environmental Research Ctr; Estados Unidos Fil: Galil, Bella S.. The Steinhardt Museum Of Natural History; Israel Fil: Hewitt, Chad L.. Murdoch University; Australia Fil: Inglis, Graeme J.. National Institute Of Water & Atmospheric Research Lt; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Keith, Inti. Charles Darwin Foundation; Ecuador Fil: Mandrak, Nicholas E.. University Of Toronto Scarborough; Canadá Fil: Marchini, Agnese. University of Pavia; Italia Fil: McKenzie, Cynthia H.. Fisheries And Ocean Canada. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre; Canadá Fil: Occhipinti‐Ambrogi, Anna. University of Pavia; Italia Fil: Ojaveer, Henn. University of Tartu; Estonia Fil: Pires‐Teixeira, Larissa M.. Universidad de Lisboa; Portugal. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil Fil: Robinson, Tamara B.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica Fil: Ruiz, Gregory M.. United States Environmental Protection Agency; Estados Unidos Fil: Seaward, Kimberley. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd.; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Schwindt, Evangelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina Fil: Son, Mikhail O.. Institute of Marine Biology; Ucrania Fil: Therriault, Thomas W.. Pacific Biological Station; Canadá Fil: Zhan, Aibin. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China

The disproportionately low presence of marine species in the list of invasive alien species (IAS) of Union concern of the European Union (EU) Regulation 1143/2014 does not fully acknowledge the threat they pose to the EU marine environment. In this study, the first EU-scale Horizon Scanning (HS) focusing on marine alien species was performed, aiming to deliver a ranked list of species that should be of high priority for risk assessment (Article 5 of the EU IAS Regulation). Species absent from or with a limited distribution in EU marine waters were targeted. In total, 363 alien species were initially screened for HS by a panel of experts, including a broad range of taxonomic groups. Species were scored for their likelihood of arrival, establishment, spread, and impact in EU waters. A consensus workshop ranked 267 species, including a subset of 26 prioritized species. These species are considered to be mainly introduced by shipping (fouling and ballast water), via the Suez Canal, and aquaculture activities. The 26 priority species were also scrutinized in terms of feasibility of their management; 18 of them were suggested for performing risk assessments on the basis of the EU IAS Regulation. Since biological invasions are dynamic and connected with accelerated globalization and diversified human activities, we recommend HS to be repeated periodically to review the species already listed and assess new ones.

As part of a comprehensive study of trawl fishery catch off Israel (Ashdod) and Turkey (Iskenderun and Antalya) conducted during 2008-2011, the population explosion of Nemipterus randalli, first recorded in the Mediterranean Sea in the beginning of 2005, was documented. The smallest individuals occurred on deeper bottoms (120 m), significantly more individuals were collected at night, and juvenile recruitment to the commercial fishery occurred during November and December at 40 m depth.

Fishelson, L., Golani, D., Russell, B., Galil, B. and Goren, M. 2012. Comparative morphology and cytology of the alimentary tract in lizardfishes (Teleostei, Aulopiformes, Synodontidae). —Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 93: 308–318. This study compares the morphology and cytology of the alimentary tract in several species of lizardfishes (Synodontidae, Teleostei) of the genera Saurida, Synodus, and Trachinocephalus, in relation to their diets and bathymetric distribution. All the studied species feature a large, pouch-like stomach, with the intestine beginning at the stomach’s anterior apex, adjacent to the esophageal opening. In the more ‘microphagous’Synodus spp. and Trachinocephalus, the intestine bends twice before reaching the anus, whereas in the more ‘macrophagous’Saurida spp., the intestine extends straight to the anus. The species differ also in the number and form of their pyloric ceca, the length of the intestine and in the percentile relationship between stomach length and standard body length. Along the alimentary tract folds and villi protrude into the lumen, their numbers differing on various sites of the tract. Three cell types make up the gastric gland system: (1) pyramidal cells forming the tubular gastric glands in the lamina propria; among them are large, pale secretary cells; (2) groups of neck cells that surround the pits of the tubules; and (3) groups of large and granule-rich cells at the end portion of the stomach. All species are carnivorous and uniform in morphology, the differences in the alimentary tract found between the more shallow-water species of Synodus and Trachinocephalus, and the deeper-dwelling Saurida, seem to be only partly correlated with the differences in diet.

A study of the structure of the fish community associated with a vermetid reef at Shiqmona, Israel, revealed the highest fish biodiversity (36 species) of any habitat along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Despite the prevalence of fish of Erythrean origin in the Levantine littoral, the benthic fish community at the site is entirely autochthonous. The families richest in members were the Blenniidae and the Gobiidae. Eighteen species are benthic, sixteen supra-benthic and two pelagic.

Species composition, distribution, and relative abundance of macrobenthic fauna were examined at Haifa Bay on the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Benthic samples were taken over a two-year period at twenty sites ranging in depth from 10-80m. The relevant sedimentological features of the area are discussed. Classification of the faunal data produced a hierarchical grouping of sites and species, displayed as dendrograms. Ten sample groups and eleven species associations are identified. The observed qualitative differences arc related to the prevailing environmental conditions in the area. A unique species association, related to cobble-sized bioherms, is described. Massive penetration by four benthic species of Indo-Pacific origin, Lessepsian migrants, is reported.

The results of a year long study in which soft-bottom epibenthic invertebrates were collected by grab, dredge and beam-trawl, along the southern Mediterranean coast of Israel, are described in this paper. The classificatory analysis used for both normal and inverse analyses used two measures of dissimilarity - Canberra metric and Bray-Curtis, and both group-average and nearest-neighbour clustering. The results were displayed as dendrograms. Four site groups and five species groups characterised a total of 58 site samples and 245 species. The prominent species in each of the five species groups are mentioned. The applicability of “community concepts” and the effects of sediment properties on community structure are discussed.