1. Potential role of left atrial strain in estimation of left atrial pressure in patients with chronic heart failure
- Author
-
Yaar S. Aga, Sabrina Abou Kamar, Jie Fen Chin, Victor. J. van denBerg, Mihai Strachinaru, Daniel Bowen, Rene Frowijn, Martijn K. Akkerhuis, Alina A. Constantinescu, Victor Umans, Marcel L. Geleijnse, Eric Boersma, Jasper J. Brugts, Isabella Kardys, and Bas M. vanDalen
- Subjects
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ,Left atrial strain ,Left atrial pressure ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Abstract Aims In a large proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, echocardiographic estimation of left atrial pressure (LAP) is not possible when the ratio of the peak early left ventricular filling velocity over the late filling velocity (E/A ratio) is not available, which may occur due to several potential causes. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) is correlated with LV filling pressures and may serve as an alternative parameter in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether LASr can be used to estimate LAP in HFrEF patients in whom E/A ratio is not available. Methods and results Echocardiograms of chronic HFrEF patients were analysed and LASr was assessed with speckle tracking echocardiography. LAP was estimated using the current ASE/EACVI algorithm. Patients were divided into those in whom LAP could be estimated using this algorithm (LAPe) and into those in whom this was not possible because E/A ratio was not available (LAPne). We assessed the prognostic value of LASr on the primary endpoint (PEP), which comprised the composite of hospitalization for the management of acute or worsened HF, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation, and cardiovascular death, whichever occurred first in time. We studied 153 patients with a mean age of 58 years of whom 76% men and 82% who were in NYHA class I‐II. A total of 86 were in the LAPe group and 67 in the LAPne group. LASr was significantly lower in the LAPne group as compared with the LAPe group (15.8% vs. 23.8%, P
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF