Search

Summary Background: Clinicians are required by law to keep personal patient data secure. Data protection training (DPT) has been suggested to educate medical professionals in how to most appropriately manage such information. Methods: Information regarding the handling, storage and disposal of patient information and prevalence of DPT was gathered using anonymous questionnaires. Results: The vast majority of doctors (98.6%) handle patient lists containing patient-sensitive information: 15.8 per cent used general waste bins for the disposal of lists and 57.3 per cent removed printed patient lists from hospital premises; 43.3 per cent of doctors had received DPT. A significantly greater proportion of consultants have received DPT, compared with doctors in training. Doctors who have received DPT were less likely to take patient lists away from a hospital site (p = 0.011). DPT led to a trend towards increased awareness of the security of the storage location of their patient lists and of trust policy regarding the use of personal USB devices. Discussion: With the expansion of patient data collection and storage, it is important for doctors to maintain an awareness of how to handle such data. DPT is not currently common practice. Our study suggests positive benefits from DPT, and we suggest it could improve the safety with which patient data is handled.

Background: NHS Library Services are utilised by NHS staff and junior trainees to locate scientific papers that provide them with the evidence base required for modern medical practice. The cost of accessing articles can be considerable particularly for junior trainees. Objectives: This survey looks at variations in cost of journal article loans and investigates access to particular orthopaedic journals across the country. Methods: A national survey of UK Health Libraries was performed. Access to and costs of journals and interlibrary loan services were assessed. Availability of five wide-reaching orthopaedic journals was investigated. Results: Seven hundred and ten libraries were identified. One hundred and ten libraries completed the questionnaire (16.7%). Of these, 96.2% reported free access to scientific journals for users. 99.1% of libraries used interlibrary loan services with 38.2% passing costs on to the user at an average of £2.99 per article. 72.7% of libraries supported orthopaedic services. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) had greatest onsite availability. Conclusions: The study demonstrates fluctuations in cost of access to interlibrary loan services and variation in access to important orthopaedic journals. It provides a reflection of current policy of charging for the acquisition of medical evidence by libraries in the UK.