Historically, the practical work of nursing has been based on a relationship and contact with the human body (Collie re, 2001; Draper, 2014; Lawler, 2006; Pupulim & Sawada, 2005; Sakalys, 2006; Wolf, 2014). Nurses interact with the patient's body so frequently that they touch the patient more than other healthcare professionals do (McCann & McKenna, 1993; Melia, 2014; Ribeiro Souza & Ordones do Nascimento Brandao, 2013). The human body is nursing's "site of labor" (Wolkowitz, 2002, p. 497), and nursing benefits from "privileged access" to the body (Lawler, 2006, p. 11) in states, places, and circumstances in which the body has the same need: to be assisted (Melia, 2014; Twigg, Wolkowitz, Cohen, & Nettleton, 2011; Wilde, 2003).In the literature, the human body is interpreted as a physical, concrete, and material entity to heal, treat, and medicate (body) and as a "lived body," which refers to the sensations, emotions, and feelings experienced through the body, in other words, a way of being and living "in," "with," and "through" one's own body (embodiment; Draper, 2014; James & Hockey, 2007; Lawler, 2006; Mariotti de Santana & Bessa Jorge, 2007; Moreno Altamirano, 2010; Sakalys, 2006; Wilde, 1999; Yakhlef, 2010).Scientific reflection has embraced the Cartesian dualism that sees the body-object as a physical entity, the object of disease treatment, and the body-subject as a subjective experience of illness (Carnevale, 1995; Carr, 2000; Lakoff & Johnson, 1999; Sakalys, 2006; Wilde, 2003; Yakhlef, 2010). This perspective has been questioned by modern antireductionist and antipositivist perspectives, such as that of Merleau-Ponty (Benner, 2000; Thomas, 2005). He contended that a person is an indissoluble unity of the "I" who thinks, his or her body, and his or her embodiment; we do not "have" a body, "we are" a body (Merleau-Ponty, 1945). Consequently, the meanings that we give to body and embodiment are linked to social rules and cultural beliefs (Lawler, 2006; Vannini & Waskul, 2012).However, dichotomous thinking has been strongly established in scientific research, creating a hierarchy in which the body has become the subject of detailed clinical studies, whereas embodiment has a marginal role (Holmes, 1994; Madjar, 1997). This is due to the biomedical model's preference for investigation methods applicable to the body and the objectively measurable knowledge that these methods generate, instead of patients' embodiment (Draper, 2014).Despite the increase in scientific literature and the recognition of the importance of body and embodiment in nursing over the last two decades, international theoretical and empirical research of these concepts is still neglected (Draper, 2014). The terms body and embodiment, although conceptually different, are used interchangeably and are little known and developed within the nursing discipline; researchers in the nursing field have taken very sporadic theoretical interest in the concepts (Sakalys, 2006; Thomas, 2005). Furthermore, the recognition of people's embodiment in the body as an explicit focus of the care process is rare in nursing theories (Lawler, 2006; Sakalys, 2006). Consequently, nurses learn how to work on the body through medicine, science, and practice, but they receive little instruction about the meaning of the "lived body" and the privilege of caring for it (Draper, 2014). Although both concepts are understood and defined differently in various disciplines (philosophy, anthropology, sociology, etc.), the specific contribution of nursing science is missing. The nursing field could provide a coherent representation of body and embodiment as the fundamental conditions of a person, reflecting his or her multiple dimensions and levels of understanding (Sakalys, 2006).Although body care and attention to embodiment are the central focus of nursing practice, these concepts have not yet been openly, explicitly, and theoretically accepted in the nursing discipline. …