Search

Aims The aim of the present study was to describe the real-life usage patterns of paracetamol. Methods The Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires (EGB) database, the permanent 1/97 representative sample from the French national healthcare insurance system, was searched in 2011 to identify usage patterns, concomitant chronic diseases and use of cardiovascular medication in users prescribed single-ingredient (SP) and combination (CP) paracetamol, representing 85% of all sales. Results Of 526 108 subjects aged ≥15 years in the EGB, 268 725 (51%) had paracetamol dispensed on ≥1 occasion; of these, 207 707 (77%) were dispensed only SP and 61 018 (23%) received CP with or without SP. SP users were younger (48.3 years vs. 50.5 years), and 57% of SP users vs. 58% of CP users were female. Chronic comorbidities were more common in CP than SP users. SP users had, on average, 3.4 dispensings per year vs. 5.0 for CP users, for 36 defined daily doses (DDD, 3 g) of SP vs. 53 DDD per year for CP; 49% SP users bought 14 DDD or fewer; 15% bought >60 DDD. Use of paracetamol increased with age from about 16 DDD per year in 15–30-year-olds to over 90 DDD per year in patients above the age of 75; 53% of patients ≤60 years bought fewer than 14 DDD per year, whereas 55% of those >60 bought more than 30 DDD per year. More than half the dispensings exceeded the legal per-box limit of 8 g. Conclusions Over 50% of the French adult population were dispensed paracetamol at least once over the course of a year, generally for short-term use. Considering recent misgivings on the real efficacy and safety of paracetamol, such widespread use might have important public health consequences.

Aims This study aimed to describe the real-life incidence of bleeding, arterial thrombotic events and death during vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods This was a cohort study in Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires, the 1/97 sample of the French national healthcare claims and hospitalization database, of new VKA users with definite or probable AF and no other indication, and of patients without AF, from 2007 to 2011. Prespecified outcomes were all-cause death, hospitalization for bleeding, arterial thrombotic event (ATE), or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or any of the above (composite outcome). Results Of 8894 new VKA users, 3345 had probable or certain AF, 51.7% were male, mean age was 75.1 years, 87.1% had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 and 11.6% a HAS-BLED score > 3. Among AF patients, during VKA exposure the incidence rate of bleeding was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2, 3.4] per 100 patient-years, including 0.6 (95% CI 0.3, 0.8) cerebral, 1.0 (95% CI 0.7, 1.3) digestive and 1.4 (95% CI 1.0, 1.7) other bleeds. There were 1.6 (95% CI 1.2, 2.0) ACS, 1.5 (95% CI 1.1, 1.8) ATE and 3.8 (95% CI 3.2, 4.4) deaths per 100 patient-years. The incidence rate of the composite outcome was 9.1 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 8.2, 10.0). When patients stopped VKA, bleeding decreased (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43, 1.04)), but death or thrombosis increased (RR 3.06, 95% CI 2.46, 3.81 and 1.75, 95% CI 1.14, 2.70, respectively). During VKA exposure non-AF patients had similar rates of bleeding, but fewer deaths, ACS and ischaemic events. Conclusions Real-life rates for bleeding, arterial thrombotic events, ACS and deaths in AF patients treated with VKA were similar to those observed in clinical trials.

Aims Most risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are pharmacological, dose and duration dependent. Usage patterns of prescription-only (POM) or ‘over-the-counter (OTC)’ NSAIDs may influence risks, but are not commonly described. Methods The Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires database, the permanent 1/97 representative sample from the French national healthcare insurance systems, was queried over 2009–2010 to identify usage patterns, concomitant chronic diseases and cardiovascular medication in OTC and POM NSAID users. Results Over 2 years, 229 477 of 526 108 patients had at least one NSAID dispensation; 44 484 patients (19%) were dispensed only OTC NSAIDs (93% ibuprofen) and 121 208 (53%) only POM NSAIDs. The OTC users were younger (39.9 vs. 47.4 years old) and more often female (57 vs. 53%); 69% of OTC users and 49% of POM users had only one dispensation. A mean of 14.6 defined daily doses (DDD) were dispensed over 2 years for OTC vs. 53 for POM; 93% OTC vs. 60% POM patients bought ≤ 30 DDD over 2 years, and 1.5 vs. 12% bought ≥ 90 DDD. Chronic comorbidities were found in 19% of OTC users vs. 28% of POM users; 24 vs. 37% had at least one dispensation of a cardiovascular drug over the 2 years. Conclusions Most of the use of NSAIDs appears to be short term, especially for OTC-type NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen. The validity of risk estimates for NSAIDs extrapolated from clinical trials or from observational studies not including OTC-type usage may need to be revised.

Purpose To determine healthcare claim patterns associated using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods The CADEUS study randomly identified NSAID users within the French health insurance database. One-year claims data were extracted, and NSAID indication was obtained from prescribers. Logistic regression was used in a development sample to identify claim patterns predictive of RA and models applied to a validation sample. Analyses were stratified on the dispensation of immunosuppressive agents or specific antirheumatism treatment, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate discriminant power. Results NSAID indication was provided for 26 259 of the 45 217 patients included in the CADEUS cohort; it was RA for 956 patients. Two models were constructed using the development sample (n = 13 143), stratifying on the dispensation of an immunosuppressive agent or specific antirheumatism treatment. Discriminant power was high for both models (AUC > 0.80) and was not statistically different from that found when applied to the validation sample (n = 13 116). Conclusions The models derived from this study may help to identify patients prescribed NSAIDs who are likely to have RA in claims databases without medical data such as treatment indication. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • To our knowledge, no study has ever described the intensity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) utilization in an employed population by occupation. • As the use of NSAIDs carries a well-known risk of adverse effects, this risk adds to the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in employed populations. • Information on utilization of NSAIDs in this context will help to better characterize and prevent this risk. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • In spite of a previous history of dyspepsia, blue collar workers had the highest rate of chronic and continuous utilization of nonselective NSAIDs. • No clustering of cyclooxygenase-2 selective NSAID utilization according to a previous history of dyspepsia was observed among blue collar workers. • The association between chronicity of NSAID utilization and occupation was independent of medical indication for the prescription and other lifestyle factors. AIM The aim of this study was to compare patterns of utilization of NSAIDs for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) by occupation in a general employed population. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of the CADEUS cohort study on 5651 actively employed patients, who submitted at least one claim for the reimbursement of a NSAID dispensation for a MSD between August 2003 and July 2004, in the French National Healthcare Insurance database. Questionnaires were sent to prescribing physicians to obtain diagnoses and the medical history, and to patients for their occupation, height and weight and smoking status. Multivariate logistic regression was used to study the determinants of a heavy use of NSAIDs defined as ‘over four dispensations in one year with less than two months between any two’. RESULTS Factors associated with heavy use of NSAIDs were age (Odds ratio (OR): 1.8 (ten years), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–1.9), osteoarthritis (versus back pain) (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5–2.1), body mass index (superior to 30) (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5–2.2), and occupation (blue collar versus white collar workers) (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2–1.6). Blue collar workers also had a 20% higher prevalence of 5-year history of dyspepsia. No difference was observed between sexes or in the use of COX-2 selective inhibitors between occupations. CONCLUSION Factors associated with occupational constraints that contribute to the severity of MSDs, may explain the heavier use of NSAIDs among blue collar workers in spite of a concurrent and past medical history of adverse reactions to this type of medication.

Purpose We describe drug–drug interactions (DDIs) encountered with antifungals in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective observational study of hospitalized adults receiving systemic antifungal treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the infectious diseases unit (IDU) of the University Hospital of Bordeaux, France between 1996 and 2001. All treatment episodes with antifungal agent were examined and all prescribed concomitant medication identified for potential drug–drug interactions (PDDI)-serious events occurring during treatment were adjudicated for clinical DDI. Results There were 150 treatment episodes with antifungal agent in 105 patients. Fluconazole was used in 48% of the treatment episodes, amphotericin B in 46%, itraconazole in 4.7% and flucytosine in 1.3%. One hundred and sixteen PDDIs were identified related to the use of amphotericin B (81.0%), fluconazole (17.2%) or itraconazole (1.7%). Of these, 22 were associated with a clinical evidence of adverse interaction (hypokalemia, increased creatininemia or nephrotoxicity). All these clinical drug–drug interactions (CDDIs) were with amphotericin B. They were due to furosemide (36.4%), cyclosporine (31.8%) and hydrocortisone (18.2%). PDDIs were mostly associated with leukaemia (40.4%), HIV infection (24.6%) and cancer (10.5%). Conclusions In ICU and IDU, systemic antifungal treatments lead to many PDDIs, mainly related to the type of antifungal used and to the pathology treated. Clinical DDI seem more common with amphotericin. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Objective: To assess whether current use of psychoactive substance(s) is a prognostic factor during hospitalization for intentional drug overdose (IDO). Method: Current intoxication with psychoactive substance(s) [cannabis, opiate, buprenorphine, amphetamine/ecstasy, cocaine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)] was identified using toxicological urinalysis in 671 patients with IDO. An IDO was a priori defined as serious if associated with one of the following events: death, hospitalization in intensive care unit longer than 48 h, respiratory support, use of vasopressive drugs, cardiac massage or dialysis. Results: Subjects positive for toxicological assays were twice as likely to present with serious IDO (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.8, P = 0.001), independently from a large range of confounding factors. The risk of serious IDO was especially marked in subjects using LSD, buprenorphine or opiates. Conclusion: Systematic investigation of substance use could be important to adapt medical management of subjects with IDO in general hospital, but also in primary care and psychiatric settings.

Objective: To assess the accuracy of self-reported substance use and toxicological assays in subjects admitted for Intentional Drug Overdose (IDO), using as a reference diagnosis of substance use disorder. Method: Self-reported substance use was collected and toxicological assays were carried out in urine samples in 507 patients with IDO. A standardized psychiatric evaluation was performed in 100 randomly selected subjects. Results: In routine practice, the emergency department staff did not investigate substance use in nearly one of two patients. Patients’ statements and toxicological assays were more specific than sensitive, with lower scores for toxicological assays. Patients’ statements made it possible to detect nearly 80% of subjects with substance use disorder. Conclusion: Identification of substance use disorder in subjects with IDO has strong clinical consequences regarding treatment and prevention of suicidal behaviour. Thus, emergency department staff should be made aware of the value of more systematically exploring self-reported substance use.