1. Extending the assessment of patient-centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis
- Author
-
Abdul-Razak Abubakari, Debbie Baldie, Eileen McKenna, Brian Williams, Joanne Coyle, Susan Mackie, Martyn C. Jones, Stephen MacGillivray, and Janice Rattray
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,03 medical and health sciences ,Sex Factors ,0302 clinical medicine ,Nursing ,Patient-Centered Care ,Patient experience ,Health care ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,General Nursing ,Aged ,Quality Indicators, Health Care ,Face validity ,Response rate (survey) ,030504 nursing ,business.industry ,Discriminant validity ,Reproducibility of Results ,Professional-Patient Relations ,General Medicine ,Focus Groups ,Middle Aged ,Health Surveys ,Focus group ,Exploratory factor analysis ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Scotland ,Patient Satisfaction ,Family medicine ,Scale (social sciences) ,Female ,Factor Analysis, Statistical ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
Aims and objectives To update and re-validate the Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale for use as a patient appraisal of received healthcare. Background Healthcare in the United Kingdom and beyond is required to deliver high quality, person-centred care that is clinically effective and safe. However, patient experience is not uniform, and complaints often focus on the way patients have been treated. Legislation in United Kingdom requires health services to gather and use patients' evaluations of care to improve services. Design This study uses scoping literature reviews, cognitive testing of questionnaire items with patient and healthcare staff focus groups, and exploratory factor analysis. Methods/Setting/Participants Data were collected from 790 participants across 34 wards in two acute hospitals in one National Health Service Health Board in Scotland from September 2011–February 2012. Ethics and Research and Development approval were obtained. Results Fifty six unique items identified through literature review were added to 72 original Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale items. Face validity interviews removed ambiguous or low relevance items leaving 88 items for administration to patients. Two hundred and ninety questionnaires were returned, representing 37% response rate, 71 were incomplete. Thus 219 complete data were used for Exploratory Factor Analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation. This revealed a 31 item, three factor solution, Care and Respect; Understanding and Engagement; Patient Concerns, with good reliability, concurrent and discriminant validity in terms of gender. A shortened 10 item measure based on the top 3 or 4 loading items on each scale was comparable. Relevance to clinical practice The short scale version is now being routinized in real-time evaluation of patient experience contributing to this United Kingdom, National Health Service setting meeting its policy and legislative requirements. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community? •The updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale; •Is a reliable and valid measure specifically designed to capture the issues that matter most to people receiving secondary care. •Has been developed based upon current conceptualisations of person-centred care and the clinical practices required to deliver this. •May be used within service improvement work as a trigger to ensure person-centred care delivery.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF