Search

Background: Penile trauma is associated with debilitating complications. Apart from its sparse literature, contextually relevant evidence on aetiology and standardized severity grading, and its stratification by legal age are needed. This study aimed to describe the frequency, aetiology and injury severity grade of patients, and explore the association of specific factors by legal age., Subjects, Materials and Methods: A single-centre retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in our centre. Male patients with penile trauma managed by urologists were included. Data on age, year of presentation, aetiology, penile injury extent and co-existing genitourethral injuries were obtained. Descriptive and inferential statistics were undertaken using SPSS and MedCalc. Pvalue < 0.05 was considered significant., Results: Forty-two patient records were analyzed. The median age and interquartile range for legal minors and legal adults were 9.5 (5.0-14.8) years and 31.0 (22.5-41.0) years, and they constituted 28.6% (n=12) and 71.4% (n=30) of the study population respectively. Penile trauma was isolated in 26.2% (n=11) of the total population.Its annual frequency was below the median volume between 2001 and 2008 but shifted to a rate above the average level between 2017 and 2021. The rate of conveyor belt-related aetiology and high-grade trauma was 41.7% and 75.0% in legal minors while it was 26.1% and 53.3% respectively in legal adults., Conclusions: Grade IV trauma was the most predominant while conveyor belt injury was the most common cause of the injury. Albeit limitations of statistical comparison, the rate of conveyor belt injury and high-grade trauma was numerically high in legal minors., Competing Interests: The Authors declare that no competing interest exists, (Copyright © 2024 by West African Journal of Medicine.)

Background: Ageing population in all parts of the world has make dementia in the elderly an important public health issue. Behavioural and Psychological symptom of dementia like urinary incontinence seldom attract the attention of clinicians providing care for the elderly., Objective: To determine the prevalence of dementia among elderly male patients presenting with urinary incontinence to a urology clinic., Subjects and Method: We recruited consecutive elderly patients and their caregivers presenting to the urology clinic of Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital for the treatment of urinary incontinence. The patients were assessed using Socio-demographic data collecting sheet, Consortium to Establish Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD), Stick Design Test and physical examination. While the caregivers were interviewed using the Blessed Dementia Scale. A consensus diagnosis was made for each of the patients based on criteria for dementia in both Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 4th edition (DSM-IV) and International Classification for Diseases 10 edition( ICD-10). All test of statistics were carried out at 5%level of probability., Results: A total of 121 patients participated in the study. The mean age of the patients was 70.58 ± 5.47 years (95% CI=69.10-71.55). A total of 11 patients (9.10%, 95% CI=3.98-14.22) have dementia based on the consensus diagnosis. Dementia among this cohort is significantly associated with advancing age and enuresis., Conclusion: Dementia is common among elderly patients with urinary incontinence in Africa but remains large undetected and unrecognised.