1. Next-generation sequencing for tumor mutation quantification using liquid biopsies.
- Author
-
Provencio M, Pérez-Barrios C, Barquin M, Calvo V, Franco F, Sánchez E, Sánchez R, Marsden D, Cristóbal Sánchez J, Martin Acosta P, Laza-Briviesca R, Cruz-Bermúdez A, and Romero A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung genetics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Circulating Tumor DNA genetics, Female, Gene Frequency, Humans, Liquid Biopsy, Lung Neoplasms genetics, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Neoplasm Staging, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung diagnosis, Circulating Tumor DNA chemistry, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods, Lung Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients benefit from targeted therapies both in first- and second-line treatment. Nevertheless, molecular profiling of lung cancer tumors after first disease progression is seldom performed. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables not only non-invasive biomarker testing but also monitoring tumor response to treatment. Digital PCR (dPCR), although a robust approach, only enables the analysis of a limited number of mutations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), on the other hand, enables the analysis of significantly greater numbers of mutations. Methods A total of 54 circulating free DNA (cfDNA) samples from 52 NSCLC patients and two healthy donors were analyzed by NGS using the Oncomine™ Lung cfDNA Assay kit and dPCR. Results Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient between mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) assessed by NGS and dPCR revealed a positive and linear relationship between the two data sets (ρc = 0.986; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.975-0.991; r = 0.987; p < 0.0001, respectively), indicating an excellent concordance between both measurements. Similarly, the agreement between NGS and dPCR for the detection of the resistance mutation p.T790M was almost perfect (K = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.62-0.99), with an excellent correlation in terms of MAFs (ρc = 0.991; 95% CI = 0.981-0.992 and Pearson's r = 0.998; p < 0.0001). Importantly, cfDNA sequencing was successful using as low as 10 ng cfDNA input. Conclusions MAFs assessed by NGS were highly correlated with MAFs assessed by dPCR, demonstrating that NGS is a robust technique for ctDNA quantification using clinical samples, thereby allowing for dynamic genomic surveillance in the era of precision medicine.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF