1. Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns with histrelin acetate subcutaneous implants vs. leuprolide injections in children with precocious puberty: a real-world study using a US claims database.
- Author
-
Silverman LA, Han X, Huang H, Near AM, and Hu Y
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal administration & dosage, Child, Child, Preschool, Databases, Factual, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone administration & dosage, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Prognosis, Puberty, Precocious epidemiology, Puberty, Precocious pathology, Retrospective Studies, Subcutaneous Tissue, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Drug Implants administration & dosage, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone analogs & derivatives, Insurance Claim Review statistics & numerical data, Leuprolide administration & dosage, Puberty, Precocious drug therapy
- Abstract
Objectives: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs are the treatment of choice for central precocious puberty (CPP). This study characterizes patients treated with histrelin implant or leuprolide injection., Methods: A US claims database was used to identify patients aged ≤20 years with ≥1 histrelin or leuprolide claim (index treatment) between April 2010 and November 2017 and continuous enrollment ≥3 months before and ≥12 months after the index treatment date., Results: Overall, 4,217 patients (histrelin, n=1,001; leuprolide, n=3,216) were identified. The percentage of patients with CPP diagnosis was greater in the histrelin (96.5%) vs. leuprolide (68.8%; p<0.0001) cohort. In patients with CPP (histrelin, n=966; leuprolide, n=2,214), mean age at treatment initiation was similar for histrelin (9.0 ± 2.0 years) and leuprolide (9.1 ± 2.3 years), with >50% of patients aged 6-9 years. Mean treatment duration was significantly longer for histrelin (26.7 ± 14.8 months) vs. leuprolide (14.1 ± 12.1 months; p<0.0001), and was longer in younger patient groups. More patients switched from leuprolide to histrelin (12.3%) than vice versa (3.6%; p<0.0001). Median annual total treatment costs were slightly lower for the histrelin cohort ($23,071 [interquartile range, $16,833-$31,050]) than the leuprolide cohort ($27,021 [interquartile range, $18,314-$34,995]; p<0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients with CPP treated with histrelin had a longer duration of treatment, lower rates of index treatment discontinuation, and lower annual treatment costs vs. those treated with leuprolide., (© 2021 Lawrence A. Silverman et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF