Search

Background/aims: Few data on the evolution of endoscopic findings are available in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). The aim of this study was to describe this evolution in a prospective cohort., Methods: Patients admitted for a steroid-refractory ASUC and included in a randomized trial comparing infliximab and cyclosporine were eligible if they achieved steroid-free clinical remission at day 98. Flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed at baseline, days 7, 42 and 98. Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and its sub-scores - vascular pattern, bleeding and ulceration/erosion - were post-hoc calculated. Global endoscopic remission was defined by a UCEIS of 0, and partial endoscopic remission by any UCEIS sub-score of 0., Results: Among the 55 patients analyzed (29 infliximab and 26 cyclosporine), 49 (83%) had UCEIS ≥6 at baseline at baseline. Partial endoscopic remission rates were higher for bleeding than for vascular pattern and for ulcerations/erosions at day 7 (20% vs. 4% and 5% (n = 55); p = .004 and p=.04), for bleeding and ulceration/erosion than for vascular pattern at day 42 [63% and 65% vs. 33% (n=54); p<.001 for both] and at day 98 [78% and 92% vs. 56% (n = 50); p = .007 and p < .001]. Global endoscopic remission rates at day 98 were higher in patients treated with infliximab than with cyclosporine [73% vs. 25% (n = 26 and 24); p < .001]., Conclusion: In steroid-refractory ASUC patients responding to a second-line medical therapy, endoscopic remission process started with bleeding remission and was not achieved in half the patients at day 98 for vascular pattern. Infliximab provided a higher endoscopic remission rate than cyclosporine at day 98., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The Rutgeerts' scoring system is used to evaluate patients with Crohn's disease (CD) following ileocolic resection, based on endoscopic findings at the anastomosis and in the neoterminal ileum. We investigated rates of clinical and surgical recurrence of CD after surgery and effect of therapy modification based on post-operative endoscopic findings., Methods: We collected data from 365 adults with CD (20% with Rutgeerts' score i0, 10% with score i1, 49% with score i2, 12% with score i3, 9% with score i4) who underwent ileocolonoscopy within 12 months of ileocolic resection with anastomosis from 2000 through 2013 at 2 centers in Belgium and France. Patients were followed for 3 y or more after the ileocolonoscopy. Clinical post-operative recurrence (POR) was defined as occurrence of CD symptoms along with biologic, radiologic, and/or endoscopic features of disease activity; modified surgical POR was defined as either an endoscopic or surgical intervention., Results: After a median follow-up time of 88 months, 48% of patients had clinical POR and 26% had modified surgical POR. Rates of survival without clinical POR or a modified surgical POR were lower in patients with Rutgeerts' scores of i2, i3, or i4 compared to patients with scores of i0 or i1 (P < .001 and P = .02). New immunosuppressant or biological therapy was initiated following endoscopy in 129/254 patients (51%) with Rutgeerts' score of i2, i3, or i4 vs 7/111 patients (6%) with scores of i0 or i1 (odds ratio for new therapy, 14.9; 95% CI, 7.1-36.8; P < .001). A modest decrease in risk of clinical POR was observed for patients with Rutgeerts scores of i3 or i4 after initiation of immunosuppressive or biological therapy based on endoscopic findings (Breslow P = .03), but this was not observed for patients with scores of i2 (Breslow P = .46)., Conclusions: Use of immunosuppressants and tumor necrosis factor antagonists to treat patients with an asymptomatic endoscopic post-operative recurrence of CD did not reduce long-term risk of clinical recurrence in patients with Rutgeerts' scores of i2, but it had a small effect in patients with scores of i3 or i4., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The efficacy of antibody-based therapeutics depends on their pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic and exposure response profiles of ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 12/interleukin 23, are known in patients with Crohn's disease, yet there are few data from patients with ulcerative colitis. We characterized ustekinumab's pharmacokinetics, exposure response, and optimal serum concentrations in patients with ulcerative colitis., Methods: We collected data from 2 phase 3 trials (1 induction and 1 maintenance), in which patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis received an intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab (130 mg, n = 320; or approximately 6 mg/kg, n = 322). Responders were assigned randomly to groups that received subcutaneous maintenance ustekinumab (90 mg) every 8 weeks (n = 176) or 12 weeks (n = 172), or placebo (n = 175). We evaluated the association between ustekinumab concentration and efficacy, serum based on clinical effects (Mayo score), histologic features, and inflammation (measurement of C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin), as well as safety (infections, serious infections, and serious adverse events), during induction and maintenance therapy. Optimal serum concentrations of ustekinumab were identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses., Results: In patients with ulcerative colitis, dose-proportional serum concentrations of ustekinumab, unaffected by prior biologic or concomitant immunomodulator therapy, reached steady state by the second maintenance dose; the median trough concentration for dosing every 8 weeks was approximately 3-fold that of dosing every 12 weeks. Serum concentrations were associated with clinical and histologic features of efficacy and normalization of inflammation markers. The week-8 concentration threshold for induction of response was 3.7 μg/mL. A steady-state trough serum concentration of 1.3 μg/mL or higher was associated with a higher rate of clinical remission compared with patients who had lower serum concentrations. Serum concentrations of ustekinumab were not associated with infections, serious infections, or serious adverse events., Conclusions: In an analysis of data from 2 phase 3 trials of patients with ulcerative colitis, we found that serum concentrations of ustekinumab were proportional to dose, unaffected by prior biologic or concomitant immunomodulator therapies, associated with clinical and histologic efficacy and markers of inflammation, and were not associated with safety events at doses evaluated. Ustekinumab pharmacokinetics are consistent between patients with Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Ulcerative proctitis (UP) refractory to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) suppositories is a challenge to treat, often requiring step up to immunomodulator or biological therapy. Topical tacrolimus is effective and safe in patients with refractory UP. However, it is not clear how tacrolimus suppositories fit into in the treatment algorithm of UP., Methods: We performed a randomized controlled, double-blind study at 8 hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium from 2014 through 2017. Eighty-five patients with refractory UP (65% women) were randomly assigned to groups given once daily tacrolimus suppositories (2 mg; n = 43) or beclomethasone (3 mg; n = 42) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was clinical response (decrease in Mayo score of 3 or more). Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic response and remission, adverse events and quality of life. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test., Results: Proportions of patients with clinical responses were 63% in the tacrolimus group and 59% in the beclomethasone group (P = .812); proportions of patients in clinical remission were 46% and 38%, respectively (P = .638). Proportions of patients with an endoscopic response were 68% and 60% in the tacrolimus group and in the beclomethasone group (P = .636); proportions in endoscopic remission rates were 30% and 13%, respectively (P = .092) Median increases in the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire score were 18.0 in the tacrolimus group and 20.5 in the beclomethasone group (P = .395). Adverse event rates did not differ significantly between groups., Conclusions: In a 4-week randomized controlled trial, tacrolimus and beclomethasone suppositories induce comparable clinical and endoscopic responses in patients with UP refractory to 5-ASA. There were no significant differences in adverse events rates. Tacrolimus and beclomethasone suppositories are therefore each safe and effective treatment options for 5-ASA refractory disease. EUDRACT 2013-001259-11; Netherlands Trial Register NL4205/NTR4416., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: We aimed to identify biomarkers that might be used to predict responses of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) to vedolizumab therapy., Methods: We obtained biopsies from inflamed colon of patients with IBD who began treatment with vedolizumab (n = 31) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (n = 20) and performed RNA-sequencing analyses. We compared gene expression patterns between patients who did and did not enter endoscopic remission (absence of ulcerations at month 6 for patients with Crohn's disease or Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 at week 14 for patients with ulcerative colitis) and performed pathway analysis and cell deconvolution for training (n = 20) and validation (n = 11) datasets. Colon biopsies were also analyzed by immunohistochemistry. We validated a baseline gene expression pattern associated with endoscopic remission after vedolizumab therapy using 3 independent datasets (n = 66)., Results: We identified significant differences in expression levels of 44 genes between patients who entered remission after vedolizumab and those who did not; we found significant increases in leukocyte migration in colon tissues from patients who did not enter remission (P < .006). Deconvolution methods identified a significant enrichment of monocytes (P = .005), M1-macrophages (P = .05), and CD4+ T cells (P = .008) in colon tissues from patients who did not enter remission, whereas colon tissues from patients in remission had higher numbers of naïve B cells before treatment (P = .05). Baseline expression levels of PIWIL1, MAATS1, RGS13, and DCHS2 identified patients who did vs did not enter remission with 80% accuracy in the training set and 100% accuracy in validation dataset 1. We validated these findings in the 3 independent datasets by microarray, RNA sequencing and quantitative PCR analysis (P = .003). Expression levels of these 4 genes did not associate with response to anti-TNF agents. We confirmed the presence of proteins encoded by mRNAs using immunohistochemistry., Conclusions: We identified 4 genes whose baseline expression levels in colon tissues of patients with IBD associate with endoscopic remission after vedolizumab, but not anti-TNF, treatment. We validated this signature in 4 independent datasets and also at the protein level. Studies of these genes might provide insights into the mechanisms of action of vedolizumab., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The postoperative endoscopic recurrence score, commonly referred to as the Rutgeerts score, was designed to predict clinical recurrence risk in Crohn's disease (CD) patients undergoing ileocolonic resection based on early endoscopic findings at the anastomosis and in the neoterminal ileum. 1 In the pivotal publication, the i2 category, including aphthous lesions in the terminal ileum as well as ileocolonic anastomosis lesions, had a heterogeneous recurrence risk. Because anastomotic ulcers were suspected to be postsurgical ischemic lesions and less predictive of progressive disease, 2 a modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) was proposed: i2a, lesions confined to the anastomosis ±<5 isolated aphthous ulcers in the ileum; i2b, more than 5 aphthous ulcers in the ileum with normal mucosa in between, ± anastomotic lesions. 3,4 ., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Trough concentrations of vedolizumab were found to correlate with clinical response in phase 3 studies of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, there are no solid data to support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations in treated patients. We investigated the correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response in a real-world population and aimed to identify patient factors that affect exposure and response., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 consecutive patients (66 with UC and 113 with CD) who began vedolizumab therapy from September 1, 2015, through October 1, 2016, at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab were measured before all infusions up to week 30. Effectiveness endpoints included endoscopic healing (UC, Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1; CD, absence of ulcers), clinical response (physicians' global assessment), and biologic response or remission (based on level of C-reactive protein) and were assessed at week 14 (for patients with UC) and week 22 (for patients with CD). A stepwise forward addition-backward elimination modeling approach was performed to identify factors independently associated with vedolizumab exposure and response., Results: Vedolizumab trough concentrations >30.0 μg/mL at week 2, >24.0 μg/mL at week 6, and >14.0 μg/mL during maintenance therapy associated with a higher probability of attaining the effectiveness endpoints for patients with UC or CD (P < .05). Higher body mass and more severe disease (based on high level of C-reactive protein and low level of albumin and/or hemoglobin) at the start of vedolizumab therapy associated with lower trough concentrations of vedolizumab over the 30-week period and a lower probability of achieving mucosal healing (P < .05). Mucosal healing was achieved in significantly more patients with UC than patients with CD, even though a diagnosis of UC was not an independent predictor of higher vedolizumab trough concentrations., Conclusions: In a retrospective study of 179 patients with CD or UC, we observed a correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response. These findings support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations to predict patients' outcome., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The Trough Concentration Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) trial demonstrated that maintaining infliximab trough concentrations at 3 to 7 μg/mL is most effective at inducing remission in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), with fewer flares than clinic-based dosing. We performed a follow-up analysis of study participants to explore the correlation between trough dosing strategy and mucosal healing, continued infliximab use, and rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use., Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study of 226 patients with IBD who completed the maintenance phase of TAXIT, performed at the University Hospitals of Leuven in Belgium. Baseline patient characteristics, laboratory test results, and endoscopic data were obtained at the end of that study between June 2012 and December 2013 (n = 125). Long-term outcome data (IBD-related hospitalization, abdominal surgery, and systemic steroid use) were collected from the time of the last TAXIT study visit (August 2012-April 2013) until April 1, 2016. We also collected data on continued use of infliximab and trough concentrations., Results: At baseline, 91% of patients in the clinic-based dosing group and 90% of patients in the trough concentration-based dosing group had mucosal healing. After a median follow-up time of 41 months (interquartile range, 39-42 mo), infliximab treatment was continued by 81 of 108 patients (75%) from the clinic-based dosing group and 86 of 107 (80%) from the trough concentration-based dosing group. However, within 1 year, infliximab was discontinued by 10 of 27 patients (37%) from the clinic-based dosing group and 2 of 21 patients (10%) from the trough concentration-based dosing group (P = .04). The rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use were below 15% in both groups., Conclusions: At the end of a trial of clinic-based dosing vs trough concentration-based dosing of infliximab in patients with IBD, most patients had mucosal healing. Most patients (≥75%) in both groups continued taking infliximab for more than 3 years after the trial, but a significantly higher proportion of patients in the clinic-based dosing group discontinued infliximab in the first year after the end of the trial. Both groups had low rates of hospitalization, surgery, and steroid use., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a complex and progressive disease that has a significant humanistic and economic impact in patients and the wider society. Disease control is still an unmet need for a large proportion of patients. The aim of this article was to review the current evidence to assess the feasibility, value, and impact of integrating continuous clinical response (CCR) as a patient-reported outcome into routine management of UC., Methods: Literature searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, and conference proceedings were undertaken to retrieve the relevant articles regarding burden and course of disease, outcome measures in UC, tools for measuring disease activity, and models for patient's self-monitoring., Results: The concept of CCR was first introduced during the PURSUIT-M trial, where evidence was provided to support the clinical and quality of life benefits of achieving CCR. However, patient monitoring as implemented during the trial was not feasible for its use in the real world. Thus, a simple self-reported score (eg, PRO2) to monitor CCR, with good correlation with more complex procedure-driven indices, was identified for its use in routine patient care. Feasibility of introducing this easy-to-use tool over time as an integral part of patient management was also explored., Conclusions: The introduction of CCR as a management goal for UC patients may pose the step change needed to improve disease course and patient's life. Providing patients with simple tools to continuously monitor their disease activity is the first step for an integrated self-monitoring model of care in UC., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: This systematic review investigated the efficacy and the effectiveness of biologic drugs in extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane until October 2015. Main inclusion criteria were adults with IBD, use of a biologic drug, evolution of EIMs, interventional study, or non-interventional study., Results: Nine interventional studies (2 randomized controlled trials [N = 797], 7 open label trials [N = 1143], and 13 non-interventional studies [N = 914]) were included. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists achieved complete response for pyoderma gangrenosum in 21%-25% of patients in interventional studies and in 92%-100% patients in non-interventional studies, with similar results for other cutaneous manifestations such as erythema nodosum or stomatitis. Adalimumab significantly reduced the prevalence of anemia vs placebo after 56 weeks in 1 randomized controlled trial. In 2 non-interventional studies, anti-TNF therapy improved anemia in the short-term (67%) and in the long-term (34%). Complete response after anti-TNF treatment was reported in interventional studies, including arthralgia (reduction in prevalence from 47.1% to 26.8% in the mid-term in 1 open label trial) and arthritis (reduction in prevalence from 8.7% to 2.1% and from 58% to 12.5% in 2 open label trials). Anti-TNFs were beneficial for a majority of patients with ocular manifestations. Infliximab was associated with improved outcomes in bone formation and bone mineral density., Conclusions: Anti-TNFs appear to be effective alternatives for certain EIMs associated with IBD including musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and ocular manifestations, and some beneficial effect may be obtained in metabolic bone disease and on hematologic or vascular EIMs., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Mucosal healing is an independent predictor of sustained clinical remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with infliximab. We investigated whether infliximab concentrations during induction therapy are associated with short-term mucosal healing (STMH) in patients with UC., Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of data collected from a tertiary referral center from 101 patients with UC who received scheduled induction therapy with infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and had an endoscopic evaluation at baseline and after induction therapy. STMH was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1, assessed at weeks 10-14, with baseline sub-score ≥2. Infliximab concentrations were evaluated in serum samples collected at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14 of infliximab therapy by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay we developed., Results: Fifty-four patients (53.4%) achieved STMH. Patients with STMH had a higher median infliximab concentration at weeks 2, 6, and 14 than patients without STMH. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified infliximab concentration thresholds of 28.3 (area under the ROC curve [AUROC], 0.638), 15 (AUROC, 0.688), and 2.1 μg/mL (AUROC, 0.781) that associated with STMH at weeks 2, 6, and 14, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified infliximab concentration ≥15 at week 6 (P = .025; odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-17.1) and ≥2.1 μg/mL at week 14 (P = .004; odds ratio, 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-18) as independent factors associated with STMH., Conclusions: In an analysis of data from real-life clinical practice, we associated infliximab concentrations during the induction therapy with STMH in patients with UC., (Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: There are limited data on the effects of discontinuing infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the long-term outcome of patients with CD who discontinued infliximab while in clinical remission, and searched for prognostic markers of continued remission after infliximab cessation., Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of 100 patients with CD who discontinued infliximab upon achieving clinical remission; 84 patients continued immunomodulator therapy. Clinical and endoscopic data were retrieved from a medical database in Belgium, and patients were followed up through April 2013 (median, 9.7 y; interquartile range, 8-11.5 y). Sustained clinical remission (SCR) was defined as maintenance of disease remission, without escalation in medical therapy or CD-related surgeries, until the end of the follow-up period. We measured trough concentrations of infliximab, antibodies to microbial antigens, and circulating inflammatory markers in serum samples collected before treatment and at the time of infliximab discontinuation., Results: At the end of the follow-up period, 52 patients had SCR. Univariate (log-rank) analysis associated SCR with patient age at diagnosis (≥25 y; P = .012) and disease duration (<1 y; P = .017). Among factors evaluated at the time of infliximab discontinuation, infliximab trough concentrations (<6 μg/mL; P = .031), complete mucosal healing (P = .046), and serum positivity for vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (>0.67 μg/mL; P = .024) were associated with SCR. In multiple Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, only age at diagnosis of 25 years and older was associated independently with SCR (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.25; P = .04)., Conclusions: In a large, real-life study, 52% of patients with CD who discontinued infliximab upon achieving clinical remission remained in SCR after a median period of approximately 10 years; Most patients remained on immunomodulator therapy. Although patients with CD have variable responses to infliximab, a subgroup achieved long-term remission after infliximab discontinuation., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Infliximab is effective for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), but few factors have been identified that predict long-term outcome of therapy. We aimed to identify a panel of markers associated with outcome of infliximab therapy to help physicians make personalized treatment decisions., Methods: We collected data from the first 285 patients with refractory UC (41% female; median age, 39 y) treated with infliximab before July 2012 at University Hospitals Leuven, in Belgium. We performed a Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors that predicted relapse-free and colectomy-free survival, and used these factors to create a panel of markers (risk panel)., Results: During a median follow-up period of 5 years, 61% of patients relapsed and 20% required colectomy. Independent predictors of relapse-free survival included short-term complete clinical response (odds ratio [OR], 3.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-5.97; P < .001), mucosal healing (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17-2.98; P = .009), and absence of atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.23-3.12; P = .005). Independent predictors of colectomy-free survival included short-term clinical response (OR, 7.74; 95% CI, 2.76-21.68; P < .001), mucosal healing (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.16-13.97; P = .028), baseline level of C-reactive protein (CRP) of 5 mg/L or less (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.26-6.89; P = .012), and baseline level of albumin of 35 g/L or greater (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.12-8.22; P = .029). Based on serologic analysis of a subgroup of 112 patients, levels of infliximab greater than 2.5 μg/mL at week 14 of treatment predicted relapse-free survival (P < .001) and colectomy-free survival (P = .034). A risk panel that included levels of pANCA, CRP, albumin, clinical response, and mucosal healing identified patients at risk for UC relapse or colectomy (both P < .001)., Conclusions: Clinical response and mucosal healing were confirmed as independent predictors of long-term outcome from infliximab therapy in patients with UC. We identified additional factors (levels of pANCA, CRP, and albumin) to create a risk panel that predicts long-term outcomes of therapy. Serum levels of infliximab at week 14 of treatment also were associated with patient outcomes. Our risk panel and short-term serum levels of infliximab therefore might be used to guide therapy., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The addition of immunomodulators increases the efficacy of maintenance therapy with infliximab for up to 1 year in patients with Crohn's disease who have not been previously treated with immunomodulators. However, there are questions about the effect of withdrawing immunomodulator therapy from these patients. We studied the effects of treatment with infliximab and immunomodulators (co-treatment) and then immunomodulator withdrawal on long-term outcomes of patients, as well as trough levels of infliximab and formation of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI)., Methods: In a retrospective study with the median follow-up period of 34 months (interquartile range, 19-58 months), we analyzed data from 223 patients treated for Crohn's disease between May 1999 and December 2010 at the University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (65 received infliximab monotherapy, 158 received infliximab and an immunomodulator). Trough levels of infliximab and levels of ATI were measured in blood samples collected from 117 patients throughout co-treatment, as well as the time of immunomodulator withdrawal and after withdrawal., Results: Patients receiving co-treatment had higher trough levels of infliximab (adjusted mean increase, 1.44-fold) than those receiving infliximab monotherapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.92; P = .02). A smaller percentage of patients receiving co-treatment developed ATI (35 of 158, 22%) than those receiving infliximab monotherapy (25 of 65, 38%; P = .01). Among co-treated patients, levels of infliximab remained stable after immunomodulators were withdrawn (before: 3.2 μg/mL; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8 μg/mL and after: 3.7 μg/mL; 95% CI, 1.3-6.3 μg/mL; P = .70). After withdrawal of immunomodulators, 45 of 117 patients (38%) required increasing doses of infliximab, and 21 of 117 (18%) discontinued infliximab. At the time of immunomodulator withdrawal, trough levels of infliximab and C-reactive protein were most strongly associated with response to infliximab thereafter., Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis, we confirmed that withdrawal of immunomodulators after at least 6 months (median, 13 months) of co-treatment with infliximab does not reduce the trough levels of infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease. Detectable trough levels of infliximab at the time of immunomodulator withdrawal are associated with long-term response., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Surveillance guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer (IBD-CRC) are based on findings from retrospective studies. We aimed to create and validate a prediction rule to assist clinicians in identifying patients with IBD who are at low and high risk for CRC., Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 2 cohorts of patients from tertiary care centers (the University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium, and 7 University Medical Centers in The Netherlands). Multivariate Cox regression was used to select independent risk factors for CRC in the Leuven cohort. Based on their regression coefficients (β), we created a rule to predict risk for CRC. In validation studies, the predictive strength was tested by C-statistic analysis and then validated externally in the Dutch cohort., Results: In total, we identified 50 patients with IBD-CRC (cases) and 136 patients with IBD without CRC (controls) in Leuven, and 138 cases and 206 controls in the Dutch cohort. From the Leuven cohort we created the CRC risk prediction rule based on 4 risk factors: IBD-type ulcerative colitis (β = 1.2), primary sclerosing cholangitis (β = 1.1), extent of colonic disease ≥50% (β = 1.1), and postinflammatory polyps (β = 0.8). The prediction rule consisted of a total score for each individual patient calculated from the presence or absence of these 4 risk factors. For example, a score of 13 represented patients who had extensive Crohn's disease without PSC or postinflammatory polyps, who had a 15% likelihood of CRC in the Leuven cohort and a 24% likelihood of CRC in the Dutch cohort. Scores of 0, 13, 23, 27, and 37 represented patients with Crohn's disease, and scores 15, 25, 28, 38, 42, and 52 represented patients with ulcerative colitis. The total score per patient had a C-statistic of 0.75. In the Dutch cohort this score had a C-statistic of 0.67., Conclusions: Ulcerative colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, disease extent ≥50%, and postinflammatory polyps were found to determine risk for CRC in patients with IBD. A surveillance guideline that incorporates the relative weights of these risk profiles would identify patients at risk for CRC more accurately than algorithms in current guidelines., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Infliximab is an antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α that is used to treat patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker used to identify and follow individuals with CD. We analyzed changes in levels of CRP in a large cohort of patients with CD undergoing treatment with infliximab., Methods: Serial levels of CRP were analyzed in 718 CD patients. Blood was collected before each infusion; a total of 8845 CRP levels were available for analysis. The correlations between CRP levels and need for dose adjustment, outcomes, and mucosal healing (based on endoscopic analysis of 253 patients) were evaluated. Therapy adjustment was considered successful if therapy continued without need for change. Subgroup analysis was performed by using data from 268 patients who received 8 weeks of maintenance therapy., Results: More patients with high baseline levels of CRP responded to infliximab than patients with normal levels (90.8% vs 82.6%; P = .014). Early normalization of CRP levels correlated with sustained long-term response (P < .001). CRP levels remained significantly higher among patients who lost their response to infliximab, compared with those with a sustained response (P = .001). At time of loss of response, CRP levels were significantly increased (median, 11.2 mg/L) and did not return to baseline levels (median, 18.2 mg/L; P = .039). CRP correlated with mucosal healing (P = .033)., Conclusions: CRP is a good marker of disease activity in patients treated with infliximab. Increased levels of CRP indicate mucosal inflammation and a likelihood of clinical relapse., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to assess the outcome of infliximab (IFX) therapy in patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD). However, few long-term data are available about its efficacy., Methods: We assessed 59 patients with pfCD by MRI and clinical evaluation at baseline. Treated patients then received paired clinical and MRI examinations for a median time period of 36 (11-53.3) weeks. Short-, mid-, and long-term effects of therapy, as well as the ability of MRI to predict treatment outcome and need for surgery, were evaluated., Results: Compared with the baseline MRI, the short-term follow-up MRI (n = 29) revealed a reduced number of fistula tracks in 13.8% and in the inflammatory activity in 55.2% of patients, respectively; mid-term MRI (n = 25) in 56% and in 52%, respectively; and long-term MRI (n = 13) in 15.4% and in 31%, respectively. Improvement of pfCD based on MRI results coincided with clinical improvement in 54.7% of the patients. Short-term and mid-term (but not long-term) MRI showed a significant decrease in the activity score. Therapy outcome was worse among patients with persisting fistulas (P = .01), collections (P = .009), and rectal wall involvement (P = .01) in the final MRI. Patients with single-branched fistulas (P < .0001) and collections (P = .006) in their baseline MRI were more likely to undergo surgery., Conclusions: MRI is a useful technique for evaluation of pfCD during the first year of follow-up. In the long-term, the MRI improvement coincides with clinical and endoscopic response to IFX in 50% of the patients., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Cyclosporine (CSA) has been shown to be effective in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and as an alternative to glucocorticosteroids in patients with severe attacks of UC. Our aim was to investigate the long-term efficacy of CSA., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to our institution with an attack of UC treated with intravenous CSA between November 1992 and October 2004. Patients who responded to intravenous CSA were switched to Neoral for 3 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis with quantitative variables compared using a 2-tailed Student t test with qualitative variables and differences compared with a chi(2) analysis., Results: A total of 118 (83%) of the 142 patients had an initial response to CSA and avoided colectomy during hospitalization. Of the 118 patients, 41 (35%) [corrected] required a future colectomy. The rate of colectomy in those already on azathioprine compared with those starting azathioprine concurrently with CSA was 59% vs 31%, respectively (P < .05). Also, 88% of patients already on azathioprine and requiring colectomy underwent surgery within the first year of receiving CSA. Life-table analysis shows that although only 33% of patients require colectomy at 1 year, 88% will require colectomy at 7 years., Conclusions: CSA is an effective short- to medium-term treatment for patients with severe UC but at 7 years, 88% of patients will require a colectomy. Azathioprine-naive patients have better outcomes.