Search

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate with activity as a single agent against non-small cell lung cancer at a recommended dose of 500 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute infusion every 21 days. The response rate in untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV disease is from 18% to 23%. It is also active in the second-line setting in patients progressing after pretreatment with a number of drugs or after a very short treatment-free interval. The response rate in these difficult-to-treat patients is approximately 9%. Toxicity in both situations is mild; myelotoxicity is primarily seen. This review describes phase I and II studies performed before folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation., (Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.)

Small cell lung cancer is a frequently relapsing tumor despite a high rate of response after first-line chemotherapy. For these patients, treatment at relapse depends on the response to first-line treatment, time off therapy, and the site of progression. For patients with a good performance status and a relapse more than 3 months after first-line treatment, the choice of chemotherapy at relapse is the same as initial therapy. In case of earlier progression, so-called non-cross-resistant chemotherapy should be given. For symptomatic metastases in bone or brain, radiotherapy usually gives temporary palliation. For intrathoracic relapse and severe obstruction of main bronchus and/or superior caval vein, radiotherapy is a possibility if not given as part of first-line treatment. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 4):48-52., (Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.)

While advanced non-small cell lung cancer is a malignancy which remains largely refractory to chemotherapy, the 1990s have seen gains in both the number of agents available as well as the frequency of use of these agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. This report reviews several studies of MTA (multitargeted antifolate, LY23 1514), a novel antifolate, as first- and second-line treatment. MTA has been tested in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a variety of patient populations, including those who have received no prior chemotherapy, those who have relapsed following prior platinum-containing therapy, and those who have relapsed following prior chemotherapy which did not contain platinum. In both groups MTA was found to be active, its activity in chemonaive patients was comparable (14%-23%) to currently used new drugs like taxanes and gemcitabine. Additionally, MTA has been studied in combination with cisplatin in patients who are chemotherapy-naive, with a response rate (42%) comparable to other modern combination regimens. Preliminary data appear promising and will be discussed.

The evaluation of the activity of new drugs against small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is discussed and the results with gemcitabine are presented. Gemcitabine has activity against untreated SCLC. Preliminary results from an ongoing study also indicate activity in so-called resistant SCLC.

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is an antineoplastic agent with clinical activity against ovarian carcinoma, small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Cisplatin (CDDP), etoposide (VP-16), and mitomycin C (MMC) are well-known anticancer agents that are also active against many of these types of cancer. Because of the low toxicity profile of gemcitabine and the differences in mechanism of cytotoxicity, combinations of these drugs with gemcitabine were studied in vitro and in vivo. Cells were exposed in vitro for 1, 4, 24, or 72 hours to gemcitabine in combination with these drugs, either simultaneously or sequentially in a constant ratio. Another approach consisted of exposure to a combination of the approximate IC25 of one drug and varying concentrations of the other drug. Synergism for several of these combinations was found in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its CDDP-resistant variant ADDP, its gemcitabine-resistant variant AG6000, and in the non-small cell lung cancer cell lines H322 and Lewis lung (LL) after a 72-hour drug treatment. Studies of the possible mechanisms of action initially focused on the major metabolic features of each drug. CDDP did not enhance the accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate and caused only marginal changes in the extent of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by gemcitabine in these cell lines. Gemcitabine increased platinum accumulation only in the ADDP cell line, but the DNA platination was enhanced in the A2780, ADDP, AG6000, and LL cell lines. MMC did not influence the formation of DSBs by gemcitabine in the LL cell line. The combination of VP-16 and gemcitabine, however, resulted in the formation of more DSBs in this cell line than each drug alone. This effect was even more pronounced when cells were exposed to VP-16 4 hours before gemcitabine. In vivo, the antitumor activity of a combination of 50 mg/kg gemcitabine and 6 mg/kg CDDP was more effective against LL tumors than each compound alone. In conclusion, gemcitabine is an attractive drug to combine with a wide range of anticancer drugs; synergism is often schedule dependent.

The clinical pharmacology of carboplatin (C) administered with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (P) was investigated in two phase I studies undertaken in 83 previously untreated patients with either non-small cell lung cancer or ovarian cancer. Carboplatin was administered over 30 minutes and paclitaxel over 3 hours. Both agents were given every 4 weeks. Non-small cell lung cancer patients were randomized to two administration sequences, either carboplatin followed by paclitaxel (C-->P) or the reverse (P-->C). Each patient received the alternate sequence during the second and subsequent courses. Ovarian cancer patients uniformly received paclitaxel before carboplatin. Platinum concentrations in plasma ultrafiltrate were measured via flameless atomic absorption spectrometry, and 122 concentration-time curves were obtained. For non-small cell lung cancer patients, the mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) per 300 mg/m2 carboplatin was 3.52 mg/mL x min (range, 1.94 to 5.83) for the sequence C-->P and 3.62 mg/mL x min (range, 1.91 to 5.01) for the sequence P-->C. No sequence-dependent effect was observed (P > .5). For ovarian cancer patients, the mean AUC per 300 mg/m2 carboplatin was 3.83 mg/mL x min (range, 2.72 to 6.10), showing no difference when compared with data derived from non-small cell lung cancer patients (P = .13). In addition, the carboplatin AUC was not influenced by increasing paclitaxel doses from 100 to 250 mg/m2. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity, and anemia was frequent. However, there was a striking lack of thrombocytopenia. Modeling of the relationship between the carboplatin AUC and the decrease in platelets revealed a 50% decrease in platelets at a carboplatin AUC (AUC50) of 6.3 mg/mL x min. This contrasts with historical data documenting a carboplatin AUC50 of 4.0 mg/mL x min. Our findings suggest that there is a considerable interaction of both drugs at the cellular level, with at least an additive effect of carboplatin on the main hematologic toxicity of paclitaxel (ie, neutropenia). There is also a protective effect exerted by paclitaxel on carboplatin-related toxicity (ie, thrombocytopenia). The clear protective effect of paclitaxel in this combination suggests that it is possible to reduce the dose interval to 3 weeks. Studies are in progress to test this hypothesis and to investigate the underlying pharmacologic interactions.

Toxicity and response rates are evaluated in a randomized phase II study comparing paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ)/cisplatin with teniposide/cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer to decide whether this study should continue as a phase III trial. A response was seen in 26% (10 of 38) of the patients receiving teniposide/cisplatin and in 40% (14 of 35) of those receiving paclitaxel/cisplatin. Overall, evidence of toxicity was more severe in the cisplatin/teniposide group, especially with regard to myelotoxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 66% of patients receiving teniposide compared with 29% of those treated with paclitaxel/cisplatin. The study is to continue as a phase III trial, with 150 patients expected to participate in each treatment group.

Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence of sleep-related and sleep-disordered-breathing (SDB)-related complaints in a group of postpolio patients compared with healthy controls., Design: A questionnaire, consisting of the validated Sleep Wake Experience List (SWEL), and a list of questions pertaining to sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), was mailed to a group of 43 postpolio patients., Participants: The patient group consisted of 43 former polio patients who had been evaluated at a neuromuscular disease clinic in a tertiary referral center for new complaints of progressive muscle weakness. The patients were requested to select two healthy controls from their neighborhood who also filled out a questionnaire., Results: In the group of postpolio patients the frequency of tiredness on waking up and during the day, headache on waking up, daytime sleepiness, and restless legs was significantly higher compared with the control group. Complaints specifically related to SDB, such as apneas and snoring, were not mentioned significantly more often by the postpolio patients., Conclusion: Up to half of postpolio patients report complaints of disordered sleep, which is likely to influence daytime functioning. Further studies, including sleep studies into SDB and restless legs, are necessary to elucidate the causes for these complaints.

A dose-finding study was set up to identify the optimal dose of the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin for phase II studies in patients with advanced chemotherapy-naive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The influence of drug sequence on the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of both agents was also assessed. To develop an ambulatory regimen for palliation of advanced NSCLC, paclitaxel was infused over 3 hours with standard premedication and carboplatin over 30 minutes. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. At each dose level, at least six patients were randomized to receive either paclitaxel followed by carboplatin or the reverse sequence. In the second and following cycles the alternate sequence was administered. The pharmacokinetics of both paclitaxel and carboplatin were compared in the first two cycles in at least two patients per dose level. Sixty-two patients have been entered in this study. Paclitaxel was increased from 100 mg/m2 in 25 mg/m2 increments up to a maximum of 225 mg/m2 combined with a fixed carboplatin dose (300 mg/m2). Thereafter, the drug doses were increased to a maximum of 400 mg/m2 carboplatin and 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel. In 243 cycles, the most frequent side effects were neutropenia, alopecia, and mild emesis. Only one patient developed a major hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel. Bone pain, myalgia, and peripheral neurotoxicity occurred more frequently at paclitaxel doses above 200 mg/m2. No significant differences in toxicity or in the pharmacokinetics of either drug were observed between the two drug sequences. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were nonlinear and consistent with saturation. At the highest paclitaxel dose (250 mg/m2 with carboplatin 350 mg/m2) a toxic death due to severe leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hemorrhage occurred. Safe doses for phase II trials in untreated NSCLC are 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel with 300 mg/m2 carboplatin. Of 50 evaluable patients, five of the six major responses were observed at paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and above, which suggests a dose-response relationship for paclitaxel in NSCLC.

Brain metastasis is one of the most troublesome forms of metastatic disease in small cell lung cancer and is seen in more than half of the patients during the course of their disease. Treatment is very often indicated to improve the usually dramatic symptoms. Whole brain radiotherapy is effective with regard to improvement of clinical symptoms in the majority of the patients. Evaluation with currently used standard response criteria if it is used as a single treatment modality has unfortunately not been carried out in the reported studies. Chemotherapy results in roentgenologically documented responses in most patients who present with brain metastases at the time of diagnosis of small cell lung cancer. Patients relapsing in the brain after or during chemotherapy have the same chance to respond to second line chemotherapy in the brain as patients who are treated for a relapse at other sites. It is unclear if the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is better than the single treatment modalities. For daily practice, whole brain radiotherapy still is considered as standard therapy for brain metastases of small cell lung cancer. However, if chemotherapy is administered for tumor outside the brain, one might delay the start of radiotherapy until the effect of the chemotherapy on the brain is known.

A phase I study of teniposide administered orally for 5 consecutive days was performed. The first dose was 60 mg/m2/d, with increments of 25 mg/m2/d. Nineteen patients entered the study and received a total of 77 courses with a median of two (range, 1 to 12). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 160 mg/m2/d and consisted of myelosuppression, mainly leukocytopenia, and gastrointestinal toxicity. Sufficient recovery of blood counts was seen by day 21 to allow for a repeat course. Two patients, treated with teniposide doses of 110 and 160 mg/m2/d, respectively, were considered toxic deaths. Partial alopecia was frequent at doses above 85 mg/m2/d. Retching and vomiting during administration of the drug were encountered in virtually all patients. Oral teniposide 135 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days on a 3-week schedule is recommended for evaluation of antitumor efficacy in phase II studies.

Over 50% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) will develop symptomatic brain metastases during the course of their disease. Results of whole brain radiotherapy, the standard treatment, are rather poor and relapses are frequent. Thus, new modes of therapy are urgently needed for these patients. In this study, the efficacy of teniposide was evaluated at a dose of 150 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 3, and 5 at 3-week intervals. In 11 of 26 evaluable patients an intracranial response was observed. Median response duration was 23 weeks (range, 9 to 50). Toxicity was acceptable, with grades 3/4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 37% and 16%, respectively, of 123 courses. Therefore, teniposide is an effective agent against brain metastases of SCLC and is suitable for palliation of these patients.

In this report, the results of two phase II studies and one pilot study of second-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer are described. Carboplatin plus vincristine given with or without ifosfamide resulted in response rates of 36% and 53%, respectively, in so-called chemotherapy-resistant patients. Toxicity of the carboplatin/vincristine regimen was mild (hematologic toxicity grade 4 was seen with 13% of the courses), whereas the combination including ifosfamide resulted in grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 57% of the courses and grade 4 leukocytopenia in 49%. A partial response was seen in one of nine patients with progression of brain metastases after chemotherapy, and in three patients the neurologic function score improved, with minor tumor reduction evident on computed tomography scan of the brain. We conclude that carboplatin is a useful agent for second-line chemotherapy in patients with an early relapse after induction chemotherapy.

Among new patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 20% to 25% are over 70 years of age and account for 8,000 cases annually in the United States. For such patients, intensive, aggressive, cytotoxic, combination chemotherapy is not often used because of its association with unacceptable morbidity and mortality rates. However, treatment of these patients is often indicated, if not demanded. Etoposide is among the most active agents for the treatment of SCLC; both oral (PO) and intravenous preparations are available. The bioavailability of etoposide PO ranges from 15% to 75%. We carried out a phase II trial of etoposide PO in elderly patients (greater than or equal to 70 years of age) with a confirmed histologic diagnosis of SCLC. Patients were treated with etoposide capsules 800 mg/m2, with the total dose divided over 5 consecutive days. Cycles were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks for a total of six cycles. All treatment was administered on an outpatient basis. Staging procedures were confined to physical examination, chest x-ray, and laboratory investigations. Further staging procedures were carried out only if clinically indicated. In September 1985, 53 patients (35 male, 18 female) with a median age of 73 years (range, 70 to 95) were treated. After staging, 24 patients (45%) had limited disease (LD); the remaining 29 patients had extensive disease (ED). Overall response was 79% (complete response [CR], 17%; partial response, 62%). CRs were seen in 8 of 24 patients (33%) with LD and in 1 of 29 patients (3%) with ED. Median survival of all patients was 9.5 months (range, 1 to 22+) with 20 patients still alive; the toxicity rate was acceptable. Total alopecia developed in all patients, whereas significant neutropenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (6%) were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths or hospital admissions. In this study, we showed activity of etoposide PO in patients with SCLC; these results were comparable with those reported for more intensive combination regimens. For elderly patients, etoposide PO provides excellent palliative treatment, with a high response rate and significant prolongation of survival. In addition, therapy is associated with minimal toxicity and can be administered entirely on an outpatient basis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)