1. The Concept of Stare Decisis in the German Legal System – a Systematically Inconsistent Concept with High Factual Importance
- Author
-
Dominik König and Peter Stainer
- Subjects
Public Administration ,Interpretation (philosophy) ,federal constitutional court ,stare decisis ,precedent ,language.human_language ,German ,german legal system ,JF20-2112 ,Political science ,Law ,language ,Constitutional court ,Meaning (existential) ,Political institutions and public administration (General) - Abstract
It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks in stare decisis and precedents in general, which – in principle – does not raise doubts. The role of precedent in the decisional process is relative and dependent on the question as to whether the case may be resolved pursuant to a legal act. In that case, precedents would not play any or almost any role at all. However, the role of precedents increases, when there is a lack of appropriate legal rights, or if legal rights require interpretation. It should be emphasised that stare decisis understood as a formally binding precedent refers only to rulings issued by the Federal Constitutional Court, whereas precedents of higher courts have a significant meaning to everyday judicial practice in Germany, despite the fact that they are not formally binding.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF