As there is limited research conducted on the changing cultural policy modes and the impact they have had on the emerging contemporary visual arts fields in Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the goal of this thesis is to examine the emergence, development, and maturation of contemporary visual arts in Latvia as a distinct organisational and institutional field between the early 1990s and the 2010s. In doing so, this study examines the role that social and political environments and infrastructures played in shaping the institutional history of the field. The research particularly focuses on the growing influence of the non-governmental sector and the changing behaviour of state actors in the formation of cultural policy trends in Latvia in the aftermath of the rapid disintegration of the Soviet Union and the effects they had on the structuration dynamics of the field. In the context of post-Soviet cultural transition of the 1990s, the term "emergence" represents a qualitative break from the relationships the actors of the new field shared with the past. In order to develop the theoretical framework for the analysis of structuration dynamics, whereby the contemporary visual arts field in Latvia came to be organised and institutionally defined throughout the 1990s and 2010s, this thesis draws on new institutionalism in organizational analysis, conceptualising that "organizations are deeply embedded in social and political environments and that organizational practices and structures are often either reflections of or responses to rules, beliefs, and conventions built into the wider environment" (Powell and Colyvas 2008, 975). The empirical analysis of this thesis is based on the sequential mixed methods research design, employing the social network analysis (SNA) as an integral research strategy during the quantitative data collection phase. In this study, the SNA is critical in expanding the understanding of the examined field and enabling the construction of a dense relational structure of the participating actors beyond the scale of the qualitative interviews, which define the first phase of the research design. Through the lens of the SNA, the field is expressed as patterns or regularities in relationships among interacting units, allowing investigating the constraining and enabling dimensions of these patterned relationships between the actors within the field. Based on SNA, in conjunction with the primary source analysis and the qualitative interviews, the empirical analysis of this thesis establishes that the development trajectory of Latvian contemporary visual arts field is divided into three distinctive historical phases, denoting innovation, local validation, and diffusion. During the innovation phase, representing the post-Soviet transition and lasting from the early 1990s to the early 2000s, the new structures and institutions in contemporary visual arts developed outside the direct influence of the Ministry of Culture, Artists' Union, and Academy of Art. Lacking systemic support and recognition from the "official" actors of the dominant state field of cultural production, the new organizations displayed a trend of autonomous development under the auspices of non-state actors. The positional configuration of the field structure, involving cultural, economic, political, social, and symbolic capitals, indicates that the structuration process, defining institutional development of the field, in its initial - innovation - phase did not occur across all levels, but was very local and professionally defined within a relatively narrow circle of artistic community. The locality where the emerging problem was generated, cognised, classified, and theorised did not represent a national level (top-down) but was peripheral and narrowly professional, denoting a bottom-up approach in institution building and the persistence of a polarised organisational reality. The local validation phase, representing the first decade of the 2000s, indicated a gradual decrease in institutional polarisation between the state and non-state actors and strongly exhibited changing behaviour of the state actors towards the field. During this phase, the emerging field, for the first time, appeared as a political category within the strategic state cultural policy planning documents and the government started playing an increasingly more important role in the constitution of the field. Latvia's accession to the European Union is analysed as the principal external factor, strongly influencing the endogenous changes within the field at the time. During the local validation phase, the field grew to be recognised as national level responsibility that was predominantly cognised, classified, and theorised in political circles, signalling the decrease in dissonance between the policy rhetoric and application, as well as between the localities where the cognition and theorisation processes took place. The diffusion phase coincided with the aftermath of the global economic crisis, which struck the country particularly hard in 2009, and this stage was characterized by increased public-private partnerships (PPP) and by emergence of strong local civil initiatives furthering the institutionalisation project of Latvian contemporary visual arts. During this final phase, the field development and the institutional framework that it represented gradually became legitimised in a wider social environment, comprising larger group of influential and active civic actors who were taking over the institutionalisation project and ensuring institutional reproduction of the field.