Search

The salience of judicial institutions in democratic and nondemocratic countries has increased, making it important to have women on these powerful and visible decision-making bodies. Yet, women have only recently gained entrance to peak judicial bodies including constitutional and supreme courts. The appointment of the first woman to a high court is a historic landmark, breaking traditional ideas of who can and should be on the court. Using a global, longitudinal data set we show that certain explanatory factors matter differently in wealthy, stable democracies and in developing countries. The method of selecting high court justices exerts influence in wealthy, stable democracies but not newer ones. Further, our findings suggest that in both sets of countries, appointments to high courts are not made in a domestic vacuum and are influenced by international norms of having women participate in governing institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Describes the behavioral patterns of justices who have sat on the US Supreme Court for ten or more terms, and commenced or completed their services between 1937 and 1993, to ascertain whether political preferences of the justices change over a time. Classes of preference-based theories that dominate contemporary research on the Court; Responses given by judicial specialists; What the data reveal; Discussion based on the findings.

Assesses the US Supreme Court's decision in `Lamb's Chapel versus Center Moriches' on the geographic constituencies involved in the case. Supreme Court and public opinion; Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion; Political significance of the Court's decision only on a local or regional basis.