Search

Copyright of Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Forensic Medicine & Forensic Sciences / Türkiye Klinikleri Adli Tıp ve Adli Bilimler Dergisi is the property of Turkiye Klinikleri and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: A limited set of common skin problems leads to a disproportionate percentage of consultations that, in addition to the economic burden and cost, will lead to a loss of physician time and confidence in the necessity and importance of counseling, but so far, written documentation. There is no information about the frequency of various skin diseases in hospitalized patients. Therefore, our goal is to investigate the frequency of skin diseases in dermatological consultations requested from other departments of teaching hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional was done over six months. We used basic information, including demographic information, cause of hospitalization and primary underlying disease, the reason for consultation, description of skin lesion, diagnosis of the requesting physician, the importance of counseling or the impact of counseling on the treatment process, the preclinical results and the final diagnosis by dermatologist and entered into the checklist. Results: There were 200 patients in this study. The most common skin diseases in the requested consultations were a drug reaction, psoriasis, vasculitis, and dermatitis. Most specialists seeking counseling were internal medicine, rheumatology, and neurology. The consulting physician’s diagnosis was correct in 52 patients. According to the dermatologist, 40 consultations were very important, 129 consultations were important and 31 consultations were insignificant. Conclusion: Our study showed that dermatology consultation was effective in 84.5% of cases in the diagnosis and treatment of patients, and only in 26% of cases, the diagnosis of primary care specialists was correct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Dermatological complaints can be seen frequently in hospitalized patients. During their inpatient, new dermatological lesions may develop, as well as exacerbate dermatological diseases that known before. Thus, the importance of inpatient consultations is increasingly. There are a limited studies in the literature that evaluating the dermatology consultations requested during hospitalization of pediatric patients. The purpose of our study was to describe the dermatology consultations in hospitalized pediatric patients. Material and Methods: A total of 137 patients consulted to dermatology clinic from the pediatric service over a period of four years were included in this study. The data were collected retrospectively from records. Results: Consultations were requested from general pediatric service. The most common primary diagnosis of inpatient pediatric patients was lung disease. The most common dermatological diagnosis in 137 patients were allergic disease followed by skin infections. Skin biopsy was performed on 28 patients by dermatology to aid for diagnosis. In evaluating the consistency between the pre-diagnosis of our clinic before the consultation and the dermatology diagnosis after the consultation, 32 patients were diagnosed differently. Conclusion: Skin lesions are frequently encountered in patient follow-up by pediatric health and disease specialists. At the same time, a significant part of the patient group of dermatologists is pediatric patients. Therefore, the cooperation of the two clinics is important in terms of diagnosis and treatment efficiency. One of the ways to create a working environment and cooperation that contributes to education between pediatrics and dermatology clinics is request a consultation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Patients who come to the emergency department with dermatological complaints are generally referred to polyclinics. This practice increases the rate of correct diagnosis and treatment. It also reduces the workload of the emergency service. In this article, we wanted to examine the patients who applied to the emergency department and referred to our outpatient clinic but had any dermatological emergencies. Material and Methods: Patients between August 2018 and February 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from computer records and outpatient doctor records. In diagnoses were divided groups like urticaria, drug eruption, viral rash diseases, dermatitis, insect bites, infective conditions and pruritus. Results: 61.1% of the patients referred from the emergency service to our outpatient clinic were female and 38.9% male. Total number of patients was 72. The mean age was 39.94±14.10 (18-68) years. Twenty-six (36.1%) patients urticaria, 12 (16.7%) patients dermatitis, 12 (16.7%) patients pruritus, 7 (9.7%) patients infective conditions, 6 (8.3%) patients drug eruption, 5 (6.9%) patients had viral eruptions diseases and 4 (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with insect bites. The youngest group was the patients diagnosed with insect bites with an average of 32.75±15.34 years and the oldest group was the group diagnosed with viral rash with an average of 52.00±14.68 years. The average complaint duration of all patients was 2.47±1.85 (1-10) days. Conclusion: It may be useful to refer patients to dermatology outpatient clinics who are not dermatological emergencies in during working hours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Sciences is the property of Turkiye Klinikleri and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)