Search

The "carpal boss" is a variant present in 19% of the population according to cadaveric studies but becomes symptomatic in only 1% of cases. With the rising popularity of "yoga," which includes prolonged hyperextension at the wrist joint with weight bearing, an increasing number of individuals with silent carpal boss present with dorsal wrist pain due to impingement over the dorsal soft tissues by this innocuous bony protuberance. This warrants the attention of radiologists and clinicians while dealing with wrist pain. It can be challenging to identify this bossing on routine radiographs, necessitating special views. We describe the use of dynamic ultrasound in diagnosing "symptomatic" carpal boss, the effects of which become even more evident on imaging during hyperextension-the triggering movement., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Aims: Both fluoroscopic water-soluble contrast swallow (FWSCS) and CT water-soluble contrast swallow (CTWSCS) are widely performed as a routine in the post-esophagectomy patient to assess for anastomotic leak. Several prospective studies have compared FWSCS and CTWSCS; however, no synthesis of the data exists., Materials and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing FWSCS and CTWSCS in the adult patient following esophagectomy for malignancy was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines., Results: Three diagnostic test accuracy studies met the inclusion criteria, directly comparing FWSCS and CTWSCS in 185 patients. FWSCS demonstrated high specificity (98%), but low sensitivity (64%). CTWSCS can be categorized as normal, mediastinal gas without contrast leak, or leakage of oral contrast. Visible leakage of oral contrast demonstrated high specificity (98%) but low sensitivity (56%). The presence of mediastinal gas increased sensitivity (84%), but reduced specificity (85%). The higher sensitivity of CTWSCS over FWSCS failed to reach significance ( P = 0.125)., Conclusion: CTWSCS shares the high specificity of FWSCS. Its higher sensitivity increases its utility as a rule-out test in the postoperative period. Additional factors that may influence decision-making are described., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.