1. [Inguinal hernia: laparoscopic or open surgery?].
- Author
-
Wullstein C, Strey C, Woeste G, and Bechstein WO
- Subjects
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Germany, Hernia, Inguinal economics, Humans, Pain, Postoperative etiology, Postoperative Complications economics, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Hernia, Inguinal surgery, Laparoscopy economics, Postoperative Complications etiology, Prostheses and Implants, Surgical Mesh
- Abstract
Background: Today, mesh repair is the preferred technique in surgery of inguinal hernia. Whether the mesh should be placed laparoscopically or by open techniques is still controversial., Methods: A comparison of open mesh and laparoscopic techniques was made with the help of meta-analyses and prospective trials. Outcome variables analysed were recurrence, chronic pain, recovery, morbidity and costs., Results: With regard to recurrence rates, both techniques gave comparable results. The laparoscopic technique shows advantages in terms of morbidity, recovery and especially a lower rate of chronic pain. Open mesh repair has the advantage of a lower risk of some rare severe intra-abdominal complications and seems to be more cost-effective., Conclusion: Both techniques of inguinal hernia repair are effective and safe. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, today no single technique can be recommended as a gold standard.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF