Search

Studies of the yellow dungfly in the 1960s provided one of the first quantitative demonstrations of the costs and benefits associated with male and female reproductive behaviour. These studies advanced appreciation of sexual selection as a significant evolutionary mechanism and contributed to the 1970s paradigm shift toward individual selectionist thinking. Three behaviours in particular led to the realization that sexual selection can continue during and after mating: (i) female receptivity to remating, (ii) sperm displacement and (iii) post-copulatory mate guarding. These behaviours either generate, or are adaptations to sperm competition, cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Here we review this body of work, and its contribution to the development of post-copulatory sexual selection theory. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’.

The past half century has seen the development of the field of post-ejaculatory sexual selection, the sequel to sexual selection for mate-acquisition (pre-ejaculatory) described by Darwin. In richness and diversity of adaptations, post-ejaculatory selection rivals that of pre-ejaculatory sexual selection. Anisogamy—and hence two sexes—likely arose by primeval gamete competition, and sperm competition remains a major force maintaining high sperm numbers. The post-ejaculatory equivalent of male–male competition for matings, sperm competition was an intense ancestral form of sexual selection, typically weakening as mobility and internal fertilization developed in many taxa, when some expenditure became diverted into pre-ejaculatory competition. Sperm competition theory has been relatively successful in explaining variation in relative testes size and sperm numbers per ejaculate and is becoming more successful in explaining variation in sperm phenotype. Sperm competition has generated many other male adaptations such as seminal fluid proteins that variously modify female reproduction towards male interests, and copulatory plugs, prolonged copulations and post-ejaculatory guarding behaviour that reduce female remating probability, many of which result in sexual conflict. This short survey of conceptual developments is intended as a broad overview, mainly as a primer for new researchers. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition'.

Isogamy is a reproductive system where all gametes are morphologically similar, especially in terms of size. Its importance goes beyond specific cases: to this day non-anisogamous systems are common outside of multicellular animals and plants, they can be found in all eukaryotic super-groups, and anisogamous organisms appear to have isogamous ancestors. Furthermore, because maleness is synonymous with the production of small gametes, an explanation for the initial origin of males and females is synonymous with understanding the transition from isogamy to anisogamy. As we show here, this transition may also be crucial for understanding why sex itself remains common even in taxa with high costs of male production (the twofold cost of sex). The transition to anisogamy implies the origin of male and female sexes, kickstarts the subsequent evolution of sex roles, and has a major impact on the costliness of sexual reproduction. Finally, we combine some of the consequences of isogamy and anisogamy in a thought experiment on the maintenance of sexual reproduction. We ask what happens if there is a less than twofold benefit to sex (not an unlikely scenario as large short-term benefits have proved difficult to find), and argue that this could lead to a situation where lineages that evolve anisogamy—and thus the highest costs of sex—end up being associated with constraints that make invasion by asexual reproduction unlikely (the ‘anisogamy gateway’ hypothesis). This article is part of the themed issue ‘Weird sex: the underappreciated diversity of sexual reproduction’.

There are various ways to estimate ejaculate expenditure. Ejaculate size or sperm number ( s ) is an absolute number of units of ejaculate. Relative ejaculate expenditure ( E ) is the expenditure on the ejaculate as the proportion of the total expenditure on all aspects of the mating, including finding and acquiring a female, and so on. Relative testis size or gonadosomatic index ( σ ) is testes mass divided by body mass; it is assumed to reflect the product of mating rate ( M ) and ejaculate mass ( s ). In a new model, where mating rate, sperm competition and sperm allocation interact, and where the female's inter-clutch interval is assumed to be independent of s or M , we show that σ is directly proportional to the mean E for a species; across species σ and E increase monotonically with sperm competition. However, the relation between s and sperm competition across species depends on the range of sperm competition (low risk or high intensity): s increases with sperm competition at low risk levels, but decreases with sperm competition at high intensity levels. This situation arises because s ∝ E / M ; both E and M increase with sperm competition, but E increases differently with sperm competition in its two ranges.

R. L. Trivers used Hamilton's rule regarding the evolution of altruistic behaviour to demonstrate the occurrence of parent- offspring conflict and concluded that this would be more severe when future offspring were half siblings rather than full siblings of the offspring currently receiving investment. Here we show that Trivers' formulation applies in a limited range of circumstances and offer an alternative formulation that is universally applicable. Under this formulation the optimal investment from the offspring's point of view in species with uniparental care and, hence, the extent of parent-offspring conflict depends on the cost of the caring parent's investment to the future fitness of the non-caring parent. [KEYWORDS: parent-offspring conflict; Hamilton's rule; half siblings; full siblings Models; relatedness; size]

The classical view of mammalian mating competition focuses on combat and threat. By contrast, field studies have revealed that male mating success in some species is more strongly determined by mate location ability than by physical dominance. In thirteen-lined ground squirrels, competition in locating oestrous females is exacerbated by sperm competition that favours the first male to mate with a female. We used a female-removal experiment to identify the distinguishing characteristics of males that were the first at finding and mating with females. Each focal female was observed the day before she entered oestrus; the identities of males that made contact with her and the locations of their interactions were recorded. The following morning the females were temporarily removed, and we monitored male search behaviour in their absence. Males that arrived first were those that had spent more time with the female the previous day relative to their rivals. Time invested the day before, in turn, was highly correlated with male search persistence and familiarity with the female's likely whereabouts. These results demonstrate that differential fertilization success can arise from information asymmetries among males: the advantaged individuals are those that have greater a priori knowledge of the reproductive state and spatial locations of prospective mates than rivals.

An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) model of scramble effort (for example, foraging speed) in competition for food or mates, where payoff may depend on competitor density, is described. An individual can increase speed (at some energetic cost) to gain a greater share of resources. The predictions are that if food input per competitor is constant (density independence), the ess foraging speed should increase with density, but if food input per patch is constant (density dependence), then the ESS foraging speed should decrease with density. The predictions of this model are tested in an experiment using different densities of cichlid fish, Aequidens portalegrensis , scrambling for food at a discrete resource patch. The results provide support for the model in a situation where payoffs are density dependent, but fit less well where they are density independent.

This paper examines sperm competition games in which both size and number of gametes in an ejaculate can be varied strategically, but under the control of the haploid sperm. It is a companion to the previous paper (Parker (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253, 245 (1993))) for the case where the strategic control is by the diploid parent. Under haploid control, the optimal balance between size and number of sperm in an ejaculate becomes quite different from that predicted for diploid control; there is a conflict between parental and gametic interests over sperm size and number. This occurs because both intra-ejaculate and inter-ejaculate sperm competition are present with haploid control, whereas intra-ejaculate competition is absent under diploid control. The magnitude of this conflict is affected by the risk of inter-ejaculate sperm competition, and by the fact that gametic interests depend on the nature of available mutations. If ejaculate expenditure trades off against numbers of matings achieved, with haploid control there is escalation towards maximal expenditure on the ejaculate. If the ejaculate expenditure is fixed by the diploid parent, but there is a size-number trade-off under haploid control, solutions depend on the mode of action of the mutation affecting sperm size or number. If mutant-bearing sperm deviate entirely at the expense of non-mutant sperm, any increase in size or number will spread. If mutant sperm deviate entirely at their own expense, the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) is the same as for diploid control; there is no conflict.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Parasitic worms (helminths) frequently have complex life cycles in which they are transmitted trophically between two or more successive hosts. Sexual reproduction often takes place in high trophic-level (TL) vertebrates, where parasites can grow to large sizes with high fecundity. Direct infection of high TL hosts, while advantageous, may be unachievable for parasites constrained to transmit trophically, because helminth propagules are unlikely to be ingested by large predators. Lack of niche overlap between propagule and definitive host (the trophic transmission vacuum) may explain the origin and/or maintenance of intermediate hosts, which overcome this transmission barrier. We show that nematodes infecting high TL definitive hosts tend to have more successive hosts in their life cycles. This relationship was modest, though, driven mainly by the minimum TL of hosts, suggesting that the shortest trophic chains leading to a host define the boundaries of the transmission vacuum. We also show that alternative modes of transmission, like host penetration, allow nematodes to reach high TLs without intermediate hosts. We suggest that widespread omnivory as well as parasite adaptations to increase transmission probably reduce, but do not eliminate, the barriers to the transmission of helminths through the food web.

Both gamete competition and gamete limitation can generate anisogamy from ancestral isogamy, and both sperm competition (SC) and sperm limitation (SL) can increase sperm numbers. Here, we compare the marginal benefits due to these two components at any given population level of sperm production using the risk and intensity models in sperm economics. We show quite generally for the intensity model (where N males compete for each set of eggs) that however severe the degree of SL, if there is at least one competitor for fertilization ( N − 1 ≥ 1), the marginal gains through SC exceed those for SL, provided that the relationship between the probability of fertilization ( F ) and increasing sperm numbers ( x ) is a concave function. In the risk model, as fertility F increases from 0 to 1.0, the threshold SC risk (the probability q that two males compete for fertilization) for SC to be the dominant force drops from 1.0 to 0. The gamete competition and gamete limitation theories for the evolution of anisogamy rely on very similar considerations: our results imply that gamete limitation could dominate only if ancestral reproduction took place in highly isolated, small spawning groups.

We give a historic overview and critical perspective of polyandry in the context of sexual selection. Early approaches tended to obfuscate the fact that the total matings (copulations) by the two sexes is equal, neglecting female interests and that females often mate with (or receive ejaculates from) more than one male (polyandry). In recent years, we have gained much more insight into adaptive reasons for polyandry, particularly from the female perspective. However, costs and benefits of multiple mating are unlikely to be equal for males and females. These must be assessed for each partner at each potential mating between male i and female j , and will often be highly asymmetric. Interests of i and j may be in conflict, with (typically, ultimately because of primordial sex differences) i benefitting and j losing from mating, although theoretically the reverse can also obtain. Polyandry reduces the sex difference in Bateman gradients, and the probability of sexual conflict over mating by: (i) reducing the potential expected value of each mating to males in inverse proportion to the number of mates per female per clutch, and also often by (ii) increasing ejaculate costs through increased sperm allocation. It can nevertheless create conflict over fertilization and increase conflict over parental investment. The observed mean mating frequency for the population (and hence the degree of polyandry) is likely, at least in part, to reflect a resolution of sexual conflict. Immense diversity exists across and within taxa in the extent of polyandry, and views on its significance have changed radically, as we illustrate using avian polyandry as a case study. Despite recent criticisms, the contribution of the early pioneers of sexual selection, Darwin and Bateman, remains generally valid, and should not, therefore, be negated; as with much in science, pioneering advances are more often amplified and refined, rather than replaced with entirely new paradigms.

Correction for ‘The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach’ by M. G. Bulmer and G. A. Parker (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 , 2381–2388. (doi: [10.1098/rspb.2002.2161][1])). On page 2383, below equation (2.8), the first sentence of the new paragraph should read: [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.2161