1. Should We Place Ureteral Stents in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy?: Consideration of Surgical Techniques and Complications
- Author
-
Jae Hyung You, Young Gon Kim, and Myung Ki Kim
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ureteral Calculi ,Treatment outcome ,Laparoscopy/Robotics ,Unnecessary Procedures ,Intraoperative Period ,Ureter ,medicine ,Retroperitoneal space ,Humans ,Retroperitoneal Space ,Laparoscopy ,Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Ureteral catheter ,Retrospective cohort study ,Ureteral stents ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,surgical procedures, operative ,Treatment Outcome ,Creatinine ,Original Article ,Female ,Stents ,business - Abstract
Purpose There is some debate over the necessity of ureteral stenting after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. We evaluated the need for ureteral stenting after retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU). Materials and Methods Between January 2009 and January 2013, 41 patients underwent RLU to remove upper ureteral stones. The retroperitoneal approach was used in all patients by a single surgeon. A double J (D-J) stent was placed in the first 17 patients after the procedure but not in any of the next 24 patients. Results The mean patient age, serum creatinine levels, and stone size were not significantly different between the two groups. The stone-free rate was 100%. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the stentless group than in the stent group (59.48 minutes vs. 77.88 minutes, p
- Published
- 2014