1. Comparison of Isoproterenol Infusion and Nitrate Spray during Provocative Head-Up Tilt Test
- Author
-
Jeong Gwan Cho, Hyung Wook Park, Jong Chun Park, Young Keun Ahn, Weon Kim, Myung Ho Jeong, Ju Han Kim, Bora Yang, and Jung Chaee Kang
- Subjects
Presyncope ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Provocation test ,Head up tilt ,medicine.disease ,Tilt table test ,Anesthesia ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Tilt test ,Isosorbide dinitrate ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Adverse effect ,business ,Vasovagal syncope ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background and Objectives:The head-up tilt test (HUT) is widely used for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. To improve the sensitivity of the test, provocation with isoproterenol is frequently used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the values of isosorbide dinitrate spray as a provocation drug in the HUT. Subjects and Methods: Two hundred patients, undergoing baseline HUT (60°for 20 minutes) for suspected vasovagal syncope or presyncope and unexplained dizziness, were enrolled. If the baseline HUT was negative, isosorbide dinitrate (2.5 mg) spray was applied sublingually (group I, n=93), or isoproterenol (3 μg/min) infused (group II, n=93), in a randomized fashion. The values of isosorbide dinitrate and isoproterenol were compared in those patients that developed a positive vasovagal response or who completed the drug-provocative HUT. Results:Syncope was similarly reproduced in both groups (47.7 vs. 41.9%, p>0.05). Type I responses were most common in both groups, and types I and II responses were more common in group I than group II (78.0 vs. 55.6% and 12.2 vs. 5.6%, p
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF