Search

Context Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) can be unilateral or bilateral irrespective of the presence of an adrenal tumor. A reliable method to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral ACS is lacking. Objective Evaluate the use of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral ACS. Design and methods This was a prospective study of AVS in patients with adrenal tumors who received a diagnosis of ACS or adrenal Cushing syndrome (CS). Unilateral secretion was defined as >2.3-fold difference in cortisol levels between the two adrenal veins. Metanephrine levels were used to ascertain correct catheter position. Results were correlated with findings on CT and iodine-131-cholesterol scintigraphy. Results Thirty-nine patients underwent AVS; there were no complications. The procedure was inconclusive in six patients and repeated with success in one, giving a success rate of 85%, and leaving 34 procedures for evaluation (adrenal CS, n = 2; ACS, n = 32). Of 14 patients with bilateral tumors, 10 had bilateral and 4 had unilateral overproduction. Of 20 patients with unilateral tumors, 11 had lateralization to the side of the tumor and the remaining had bilateral secretion. Cholesterol scintigraphy findings were concordant with those of AVS in 13 of 18 cases (72%) and discordant in 5 (28%). Conclusion Laterality of ACS does not always correspond to findings on CT images. AVS is a safe and valuable tool for differentiation between unilateral and bilateral cortisol secretion and should be considered when operative treatment of ACS is a possibility.

The cosyntropin test is used to diagnose adrenal insufficiency (AI) and nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCCAH). Current cutoffs for cortisol and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) are derived from nonstandardized immunoassays. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) offers direct measurement of steroids, prompting the need to re-establish normal ranges.The goal of this study was to define cutoff values for cortisol and 17-OHP in serum by LC-MS/MS 30 and 60 minutes after intravenous administration of 250 µg tetracosactide acetate to healthy volunteers and to compare the results with LC-MS/MS with routine immunoassays.Cosyntropin testing was performed in healthy subjects (n = 138) and in patients referred for evaluation of adrenocortical function (n = 94). Steroids were assayed by LC-MS/MS and compared with two immunoassays used in routine diagnostics (Immulite and Roche platforms). The cutoff level for cortisol was defined as the 2.5% percentile in healthy subjects not using oral estrogens (n = 121) and for 17-OHP as the 97.5% percentile.Cortisol cutoff levels for LC-MS/MS were 412 and 485 nmol/L at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively. Applying the new cutoffs, 13 of 60 (22%) subjects who had AI according to conventional criteria now had a normal test result. For 17-OHP, the cutoff levels were 8.9 and 9.0 nmol/L at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively.LC-MS/MS provides cutoff levels for cortisol and 17-OHP after cosyntropin stimulation that are lower than those based on immunoassays, possibly because cross-reactivity between steroid intermediates and cortisol is eliminated. This reduces the number of false-positive tests for AI and false-negative tests for NCCAH.

Objective: Deciding the optimal doses of glucocorticoid (GC) replacement treatment in autoimmune Addison’s disease (AAD) is impeded by the lack of reliable biomarkers. This frequently results in over-treatment, with alarming and persistent side-effects, or under-replacement, which could be fatal. There is a need to think new in the quest for robust biomarkers to optimize GC replacement in AAD at an individual level. Aim: We aimed to identify genes that are consistently up- or down-regulated in patients with AAD in response to different GC replacement doses. This information can be used to establish novel biomarkers to guide GC treatment in AAD. Methods: Step 1: Global microarray expression analysis on RNA from whole blood before and after intravenous infusion of 100 mg hydrocortisone (HC) in 10 patients with AAD. To verify the results, we performed real-time PCR to compare gene expression levels of three of the highly differentially expressed genes (FKBP5, MMP9, and DSIPI) to compare gene expression levels before and two, four, and six hours after the HC infusion. Step 2: Rt-PCR to compare expression levels of 93 GC-regulated genes in normal versus very low morning cortisol levels in 27 patients with AAD. Results: Step 1: Two hours after infusion of 100 mg HC, there was a marked increase in FKBP5, MMP9, and DSIPI expression levels. MMP9 and DSIPI expression levels correlated with serum cortisol. Step 2: Expression levels of CEBPB, DDIT4, FKBP5, DSIPI, and VDR were increased and ADARB1, ARIDB5, and POU2F1 decreased in normal versus very low morning cortisol. Normal serum cortisol levels positively correlated with DSIPI, DDIT4, and FKBP5 expression. Conclusions: We introduce gene expression as a novel approach to guide GC replacement in AAD. We suggest that gene expression of DSIPI, DDIT4, and FKBP5 are particularly promising candidate biomarkers of GC replacement, followed by MMP9, CEBPB, VDR, ADARB1, ARID5B, and POU2F1.