Search

Background In primary aldosteronism (PA), excessive, autonomous secretion of aldosterone is not suppressed by salt loading or fludrocortisone. For seated saline suppression testing (SSST), the recommended diagnostic cutoff 4-hour plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) measured by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS is 162 pmol/L. Most diagnostic laboratories, however, use immunoassays to measure PAC. The cutoff for SSST using immunoassay is not known. We hypothesized that the cutoff is different between the assays. Methods We analyzed 80 of the 87 SSST tests that were performed during our recent study defining the HPLC-MS/MS cutoff. PA was confirmed in 65 by positive fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) and/or lateralization on adrenal venous sampling and excluded in 15 by negative FST. PAC was measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay (PACIA) in the SSST samples using the DiaSorin Liaison XL analyzer, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the PACIA cutoff. Results ROC revealed good performance (area under the curve = 0.893; P < .001) of 4-hour postsaline PACIA for diagnosis of PA and an optimal diagnostic cutoff of 171 pmol/L, with sensitivity and specificity of 95.4% and 80.0%, respectively. A higher cutoff of 217 pmol/L improved specificity (86.7%) with lower sensitivity (86.2%). PACIA measurements strongly correlated with PAC measured by HPLC-MS (r = 0.94, P < .001). Conclusions A higher diagnostic cutoff for SSST should be employed when PAC is measured by immunoassay rather than HPLC-MS/MS. The results suggest that (i) PA can be excluded if 4-hour PACIA is less than 171 pmol/L, and (ii) PA is highly likely if the PACIA is greater than 217 pmol/L by chemiluminescence immunoassay. A gray zone exists between the cutoffs of 171 and 217 pmol/L, likely reflecting a lower specificity of immunoassay.

Differentiating between primary polydipsia and central diabetes insipidus (DI) can be challenging. The water deprivation test has traditionally been used to diagnosis DI, however has poor diagnostic accuracy (1). Direct measurement of anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) is limited clinically. Copeptin is the C-terminal glycoprotein moiety of ADH prohormone, and correlates well with plasma ADH. Unlike ADH, copeptin is easy to measure (2). Hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin measurements have recently been described for the diagnosis of central DI. A copeptin cut-off of >4.9 pmol/L has a diagnostic accuracy of 96.5% for distinguishing primary polydipsia from central DI (3). A copeptin assay has recently been established in our laboratory. Validation of hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin concentrations in our local population is needed before this test can be used with confidence in patients presenting to our institution with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. The aim of this study was to develop a local reference range for hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin in healthy volunteers. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 male and 10 female) were recruited. Subjects underwent a hypertonic saline test, as previously described (3). Hypertonic saline (3%) was administered as an initial 250 mL bolus followed by 0.15 mL/kg/minute until a target serum sodium of ≥150 mmol/L was reached. At this time, blood was drawn for copeptin. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 females; 5 males) have undergone the study to date. Median age was 28 years (range 26-50); median body weight 75.7 kg (range 57.9 -94.5); median baseline plasma sodium 138 mmol/L (range 136 - 140) and median serum osmolality 289.5 (range 281-297). Median peak sodium was 152 mmol/L (range 150-154) with osmolality 314.5 mmol/kg (range 306-320). Median volume of hypertonic saline infused was 1583 mL (1230-2177) and median hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin was 29.2 pmol/L (9.6-167.4). Overall symptom burden was 5/10 (range 3/10-9/10). There were no serious adverse events. Development of a local reference range for hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin measurements will assist in interpretation of the test in our local population of patients presenting with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. References 1. Fenske W, Quinkler M, Lorenz D, Zopf K, Haagen U, Papassotiriou et al. Copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome- revisiting the direct and indirect water deprivation tests. JCEM. 2011;96:1506-1515 2. Timper K, Fenske W, Kuhn F, Frech N, Arici B, Rutishauser J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. JCEM. 2015;100:2268-2274 3. Fenske, W, Refardt J, Chifu I, Schnyder I, Winzeler B, Drummond J. A copeptin-based approach in the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus. NEJM. 2018;379:428-439

Context Current threshold values for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnostic testing are based on measuring aldosterone (PAC) using immunoassays. Quantification of PAC by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) yields lower values. Objective To compare aldosterone measurement by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with LC-MS/MS and evaluate performances of proposed LC-MS/MS–specific cutoffs for PA screening and confirmatory testing. Patients and Intervention Forty-one patients underwent aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) testing to screen for, and fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) to confirm or exclude, PA. Renin (DRC) was measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay. Results Median serum PACLC-MS/MS was 27.8% lower (P < 0.05) than plasma PACRIA in 164 pairs of FST samples. A positive correlation (Spearman coefficient, 0.894, P < 0.01; Pearson r coefficient, 0.861, P < 0.01) was observed between the two assays. Thirty-seven patients showed consistent FST diagnoses (29 positive, 8 negative), whereas four showed inconsistent FSTs by the two assays. Good agreement (κ coefficient, 0.736; P < 0.01) was observed between the current FST diagnostic PACRIA cutoff of 165 pmol/L and the proposed PACLC-MS/MS cutoff of 133 pmol/L. Among 37 patients with consistent FST results, no differences were observed in sensitivity (89.7% vs 93.1%) or specificity (87.5% vs 87.5%) for PA screening between the current ARR cutoff of 70 pmol/mU (PACRIA/DRC) and the proposed cutoff of 55 pmol/mU (PACLC-MS/MS/DRC). Conclusions Adjustment of the current cutoffs for PA diagnostic testing is necessary if PAC is measured by LC-MS/MS. Our preliminary results suggest that the proposed LC-MS/MS cutoffs for ARR and FST perform as well as current RIA cutoffs.

Background: Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is the most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because both estrogen and progesterone (including in oral contraceptive agents) affect aldosterone and renin levels, we studied the effects of combined hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on ARR; renin was measured as both direct renin concentration (DRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA). Methods: Fifteen normotensive, healthy postmenopausal women underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone, DRC, PRA, electrolytes, and creatinine and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes, and creatinine at baseline and after 2 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment with combined HRT (conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg and medroxyprogesterone 2.5 mg daily). Results: Combined HRT was associated with statistically significant increases in aldosterone [median (range): baseline, 150 (85 to 600); 2 weeks, 230 (129 to 790); 6 weeks, 434 (200 to 1200) pmol/L; P < 0.001 (Friedman test)] and PRA [2.3 (1.2 to 4.3), 3.8 (1.4 to 7.0), 5.1 (1.4 to 10.8) ng/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001] but decreases in DRC [21 (10 to 31), 21 (10 to 39), and 14 (8.0 to 30) mU/L, respectively; P < 0.01], leading to increases in ARR calculated by DRC [7.8 (3.6 to 34.8), 11.4 (5.4 to 48.5), and 30.4 (10.5 to 90.2), respectively; P < 0.001]. The ARR calculated by DRC exceeded the cutoff value (70) in three patients after 6 weeks. There were no significant changes in ARR calculated by PRA [79 (26 to 184), 91 (23 to 166), and 88 (50 to 230), respectively; P = 0.282], plasma electrolytes and creatinine, or any urinary measurements. Conclusion: The combined oral HRT used in this study is capable of significantly increasing ARR with a risk of false-positive results during screening for PA but only if DRC (and not PRA) is used to calculate the ratio.

Background: The most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism is the plasma aldosterone/ renin ratio (ARR). Medications, dietary sodium, posture, and time of day all affect renin and aldosterone levels and can result in false-negative or false-positive ARRs if not controlled. Most antihypertensive medications affect the ARR and can interfere with interpretation of results. To our knowledge, no study has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of moxonidine on the ARR. Methods: Normotensive, nonmedicated male volunteers (n = 20) underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone (by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), direct renin concentration (DRC), plasma renin activity (PRA), cortisol, electrolytes and creatinine; and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes and creatinine at baseline and after 1 week of moxonidine at 0.2 mg/d and a further 5 weeks at 0.4 mg/d. Results: Compared with baseline, despite the expected significant falls in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, levels of plasma aldosterone [median, 134 (range, 90 to 535) pmol/L], DRC [20 (10 to 37) mU/L], PRA [2.2 (1.0-3.8) ng/mL/h], and ARR using either DRC [8.0 (4.4 to 14.4)] or PRA [73 (36 to 218)] were not significantly changed after either 1 [135 (98-550) pmol/L, 20 (11-35) mU/L, 2.0 (1.2-4.1) ng/mL/h, 8.8 (4.2 to 15.9), and 73 (32-194), respectively] or 6 weeks [130 (90-500) pmol/L, 22 (8 to 40) mU/L, 2.1 (1.0 to 3.2) ng/mL/h, 7.7 (4.3 to 22.4), and 84 (32 to 192), respectively] of moxonidine. There were no changes in any urinary measurements. Conclusion: Moxonidine was associated with no significant change in the ARR and may therefore be a good option for maintaining control of hypertension when screening for primary aldosteronism.

Glucocorticoid resistance due to mutations of the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) are rare, but reduced glucocorticoid sensitivity may play a role in steroid-resistant asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and septic shock. A rapid and sensitive functional assay to detect glucocorticoid resistance will be advantageous.We describe a rapid in vitro monocyte dexamethasone suppression of cytokine production (DSCP) assay with a 3-h incubation. The DSCP assay was compared with the reference stimulated lymphocyte proliferation method. We characterized the effect of delayed processing, time of sampling, and biological variation on the DSCP assay.The DSCP assay clearly distinguished subjects with a known heterozygous mutation of the NR3C1 gene from control subjects, whereas the reference method failed. Decreased glucocorticoid sensitivity was demonstrated in samples collected in the afternoon. Intra-individual variation from samples collected in the morning was 13.0 and 12.7% for the IL-6 and TNF-alpha responses with the respective inter-individual variations of 9.7 and 7.9%.The DSCP assay was superior to the reference method and was sufficiently sensitive to detect diurnal variation in control subjects. The biological variation data supported the use of a population-based reference interval. The assay is suitable for screening of glucocorticoid resistance phenotypes and may provide insight into cortisol metabolism in critically ill patients, asthmatics, and patients with inflammatory bowel disease provided that the variation due to delayed processing and time of collection are considered.

Glucocorticoid resistance is a rare genetic condition characterized by reduced sensitivity to cortisol signaling and subsequent hyperactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.The objective was to confirm the diagnosis of glucocorticoid resistance in the patient, to determine the degree of suppression of cortisol and ACTH levels in response to dexamethasone, and to determine the underlying genetic abnormality and functional consequences of the mutation.The patient presented on the first day of life with profound hypoglycemia. Initial cortisol levels were appropriately elevated; however, the patient was found to have persistently elevated levels of both cortisol and ACTH. The baby developed a tanned appearance and severe hypertension and fatigued easily with feeding. Serial oral dexamethasone suppression tests were performed with doses escalating from 0.125 mg to 12 mg dexamethasone given at 2300 h. Sequencing of the glucocorticoid receptor gene was performed along with functional studies of the glucocorticoid receptor. GH secretion was assessed with an arginine glucagon stimulation test.Cortisol and ACTH levels did not suppress with doses of up to 12 mg dexamethasone. A 2-bp deletion was found at amino acid position 773 of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain. A complete lack of dexamethasone binding and in vitro biological effect was demonstrated. GH stimulation testing was consistent with GH deficiency.The homozygous mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor gene resulted in a functionally inactive glucocorticoid receptor and apparent complete glucocorticoid resistance with biochemical GH deficiency.