Search

There still is no consensus on the treatment of choice in revision knee arthroplasty associated with severe femoral and/or tibial bone loss. A total of 44 patients underwent revision knee arthroplasty procedures using porous tantalum cones (TM cones) to reconstruct tibial and/or femoral bone defects. At latest follow up after 37 months (32-48), 38 patients remained in the study. Tibial and femoral bone loss was categorized according to the AORI-Classification. The average preoperative KSS improved from 34 (range, 6-90) to 63 points (range, 7-90 points). The VAS improved from 7.5 to 4.8. Two patients required a re-revision due to aseptic loosening. There was no correlation between the different types of knee prosthesis implanted. Our study shows favourable clinical and radiological outcomes using TM cones in managing significant bone loss in revision total knee surgery., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We report a single-surgeon experience with a noncemented modular revision shaft (Modular Prosthesis; LINK, Hamburg, Germany) with clinical and radiographic results of 63 patients after 10 years. The Harris Hip Score improved from 51 to 84 points. Intraoperative complications included 11 fractures. Four patients had postoperative femoral fractures. Further shaft revisions were necessary: 1 subsidence, 1 late fracture, 1 late deep infection. Sixty-eight percent of cases showed revision defects as graded 3° by Mallory; 95 % did not show signs of loosening or subsidence; 38 patients showed adequate bone remodeling in the shaft and proximal femur; 21 patients showed excellent recovery of preoperative osteolytic areas, and 5 patients did not show signs of remodeling. The Modular Prosthesis stem shows adequate fixation and tendency toward satisfactory bone remodeling after 10 years., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A consecutive series of 100 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at a single institution on 87 patients using a cementless collared titanium press-fit stem. Of patients, 87% received a hemispheric porous-coated cup, and 13% received a nonmodular titanium fibermesh press-fit cup. Ten hips were excluded from the longer-term evaluation: 6 were lost to follow-up, and 4 patients were deceased. Ninety hips, with an average follow-up of 81 +/- 12 months, were retrospectively reviewed. The average postoperative hip score was 94, compared with an average preoperative hip score of 42. No postoperative infections were observed, but there were 2 cases of postoperative dislocation (2%) and 1 case of thigh pain (1%) at last follow-up. There were 2 revisions, both for cup failures. There were no femoral component loosenings or revisions. There was no evidence of stem subsidence or instability. These midterm results are encouraging with this stem design.