Search

Background: Due to the severity of hip fracture complications in the geriatric population, including major morbidity and mortality, it is crucial to establish treatment goals and manage expectations as a patient-centered multidisciplinary team. Goals of care (GOC) are personalized treatment programs designed to align with the individual patient's values and preferences. There is a paucity of literature on the topic of GOC discussions, especially regarding orthopaedic injuries. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an account of GOC discussions related to geriatric hip fractures., Methods: We reviewed articles published on GOC between 1978 and 2024. The articles were identified by searching PubMed and Google Scholar. We utilized the search terms GOC discussions and hip fracture, with additional descriptors including arthroplasty and geriatric., Results: There were 11 articles that met the selection criteria and were published between 1978 and 2024. Five articles were published on GOC discussions in orthopaedic surgery, while the remaining 6 articles were published in non-orthopaedic fields. There was one systematic review, 2 narrative reviews, 6 observational studies, and 2 descriptive studies. Supplemental commentary from non-orthopaedic specialties and the fields of law and medical ethics was included to assist in highlighting barriers to GOC discussions and to explore potential strategies to enhance GOC discussions., Conclusions: Goals of care discussions provide a framework for treatment decisions based on an individual patient's values and cultural beliefs; however, these conversations may be limited by perceived time constraints, patient health care literacy, and physicians' misconceptions of what is most important to discuss. While no clear consensus was identified regarding strategies for improving GOC discussions in geriatric patients who have hip fractures, the authors recommend standardized training programs, expedited family meetings, multidisciplinary team involvement, assistive technology such as Outcome Prioritization Tool, and the incorporation of GOC discussions into institutional hip fracture pathways., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a paucity of validated selection tools to assess which patients can safely and predictably undergo same-day or 23-hour discharge in a community hospital. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of our patient selection too to identify patients who are candidates for outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a community hospital., Methods: A retrospective review of 223 consecutive (unselected) primary TJAs was performed. The patient selection tool was retrospectively applied to this cohort to determine eligibility for outpatient arthroplasty. Utilizing length of stay and discharge disposition, we identified the proportion of patients discharged home within 23 hours., Results: We found that 179 (80.1%) patients met eligibility criteria for short-stay TJA. Of the 223 patients in this study, 215 (96.4%) patients were discharged home; 17 (7.9%) were on the day of surgery, and 190 (88.3%) within 23 hours. Of the 179 eligible patients for short-stay discharge, 155 (86.6%) patients were discharged home within 23 hours. Overall, the sensitivity of the patient selection tool was 79%, the specificity was 92%, the positive predictive value was 87% and the negative predictive value was 96%., Conclusion: In this study, we found that more than 80% of patients undergoing TJA in a community hospital are eligible for short-stay arthroplasty with this selection tool. We found that this selection tool is safe and effective at predicting short-stay discharge. Further studies are needed to better ascertain the direct effects of these specific demographic traits on their effects on short-stay protocols., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an established option for improving motion in patients presenting with early stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are sometimes administered adjunctively, yet literature examining their efficacy and safety remains limited., Study Design: Retrospective, Level IV., Methods: A total of 209 patients (TKA = 230) were retrospectively examined to determine the incidence of prosthetic joint infections within 3 months following manipulation with IACI. Approximately 4.9% of initial patients had inadequate follow-up where the presence of infection could not be determined. Range of motion was assessed in patients who had follow-up at or beyond one year (n = 158) and was recorded over multiple time points., Results: No infections (0 of 230) were identified within 90 days of receiving IACI during TKA MUA. Before receiving TKA (preindex), patients averaged 111° of total arc of motion and 113° of flexion. Following index procedures, just prior to manipulation (pre-MUA), patients averaged 83° and 86° of total arc and flexion motion, respectively. At final follow-up, patients averaged 110° of total arc of motion and 111° of flexion. At six weeks following manipulation, patients had gained a mean of 25° and 24° of their total arc and flexion motion found at 1 year. This motion was preserved through a 12-month follow-up period., Conclusion: Administering IACI during TKA MUA does not harbor an elevated risk for acute prosthetic joint infections. Additionally, its use is associated with substantial increases in short-term range of motion at six weeks following manipulation, which remain preserved through long-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)