Search

Semen cryopreservation is the recommended method for protecting the fertility of men before they undergo iatrogenic treatments. However, post-thaw sperm quality is highly variable between and within individuals. Thus, prediction of post-thaw quality has not been achieved with great certainty. Men (n = 101) attending our andrology clinic each produced a single ejaculate for semen analysis and semen cryopreservation. Post-thaw semen quality was examined for associations with traditional and novel semen and seminal plasma parameters. This current research demonstrates that the cholesterol concentration of human sperm is associated with ejaculate tolerance to cryopreservation. Corrected cholesterol, calculated as the difference between the cholesterol of semen and the cholesterol of cell free seminal plasma, is predictive of post-thaw motility. This may have potential as a method to guide the number of ejaculates stored for individual patients before iatrogenic treatment and/or for the appropriate selection of ART with frozen/thawed semen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sperm cryopreservation is the only method currently available that offers men with cancer insurance against sterilising iatrogenic treatments. We carried out two cohort and cross-sectional audits to identify trends with sperm cryopreservation referral rates and sample usage rates for men diagnosed with cancer and who banked sperm at The Andrology Laboratory, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust. These retrospective audits revealed that a total of 4362 men with cancer successfully banked sperm between 1976 and 2013. Truncating the dataset to 2009 to allow for lag times between storage and use, the overall sample usage rate for cancer patients was 6.0% with 75 live births. Increased median age at referral influences the cancer profile of men seen at the bank, which is highlighted by a disproportionate rise in the number of men with prostate cancer. Among men who use banked sperm, a large rise in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection has occurred over time. The number of patients requiring the service is sharply increasing year on year as are the number of patients who go on to use their sample in assisted conception. The historical use rates of frozen sperm are likely to be significant underestimations of future use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sperm banking is routinely offered to men where there is a risk of infertility following cancer treatment but uptake is lower than expected. Since these men may turn to the internet for information, we used the search engine to identify the material available about sperm banking and fertility preservation options. Sixty-six resources (NHS/Private Clinic, Charity, Press Releases, General and Forums/Blogs) fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and were examined for quality including readability, layout and content. The most frequently reported information related to: (1) effects of cancer treatment on fertility (77.3%); (2) reasons to bank sperm (69.7%); and (3) fertility recovery after treatment (57.6%). Information about maintaining contact with the sperm bank (18.2%) and disposal of banked samples (10.6%) was less often included. The quality of information available on the Internet about sperm banking was variable. The readability of all resources was assessed as 'fairly difficult', i.e. reading skills required were too complex for the average member of the public to understand. Furthermore, visual presentation of material (e.g. lay out) did not facilitate easy reading. More attention should be given to information about longer-term issues, such as fertility recovery and the use or disposal of banked sperm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Existing research into sperm banking by young males following a cancer diagnosis is predominantly quantitative; little is known about personal experiences, psychosocial and attitudinal barriers to it amongst patients and/or professionals, or the later impact of potential or actual subfertility when banking has or has not taken place. This qualitative study used single in-depth interviews with 16 males aged 13 to 20 at diagnosis (16 to 30 years at interview) to report retrospectively on their experiences, concerns and satisfactions. There was support for sperm banking, including among those who declined to bank or failed to do so successfully. Many reported that, when successful, it eased any later fertility-related concerns by offering a possible alternative route to biological fatherhood. There was satisfaction with levels of understanding, recall and decision making, though lack of clarity about consent conditions. Sperm bank professionals were less likely than oncology staff to achieve good rapport. Improvements to consent arrangements, facilities, written information and sharing of results were suggested. Small numbers from minority ethnic or disabled communities meant that any uniqueness in their experiences could not be identified. While some improvements to the process of sperm banking and follow-up can be acted upon with minimal implications, others may be more complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased awareness of the importance of fertility concerns to teenage cancer survivors is leading to growing numbers of male teenagers being offered sperm banking at the time of diagnosis. This is now extending to males diagnosed with other conditions where gonadotoxic agents are used in treatment. The storage of sperm in these circumstances is a challenging aspect of health care, given the complex issues and timescale involved. UK law has been enacted to protect legal minors from the potentially harmful effects of exposure to pornographic materials, yet there is reason to suppose that their use in this context could have therapeutic benefit in aiding successful masturbation. This paper uses material gained through consultation with the eleven largest UK sperm banks and 94 male teenage cancer survivors, to discuss the associated legal and ethical dilemmas, including those around the role of parents/carers. Findings suggest that there is variable practice in sperm banks, that almost a quarter of teenage males wanted access to soft porn when banking sperm, and half wanted to bring in their own materials. It concludes that there is an urgent need for any legal barriers to the therapeutic use of pornographic materials to be understood and examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interviews were undertaken with 22 health and social work professionals. Their analysis was completed using 'selective transcription", noting understanding of process, issues and themes, and building a picture against which to consider the analysis of subsequent interviews with teenagers and parents. Professionals were also asked to identify areas for feedback from these participants. This work was part of a larger study of (i) the perceptions of adolescent males and their parents of fertility preservation services following a cancer diagnosis, and (ii) national postal surveys of common practices, areas of variance and issues experienced by professionals in UK regional paediatric oncology centres and licensed assisted conception centres. A large number of concerns were identified, which reflected professionals' difficulties in building and maintaining a relevant, adequate knowledge and skills base given the limited numbers of teenagers offered this service. The lack of appropriate training about the legal and consent frameworks, and the processes involved was also highlighted across all professional groups as was the confusion around professional and legal responsibilities for follow up. Thus, there was considerable professional uncertainty in a number of aspects of this sensitive area of service provision. Consideration needs to be given to the needs for national guidance, for training, support and updating, for liaison between the different health and social care sectors that may be involved, and for appropriate information systems. These need to be in place for each stage of the process, from diagnosis through to eventual discharge from the health system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]