Search

Poor retention in HIV care is associated with poor clinical outcomes and mortality. Previous studies of predictors of poor retention have been conducted with a wide variety of populations, using different measures of retention, and occasionally have conflicting results. We studied demographic and psychosocial factors associated with inter-visit interval length in a setting of universal health care and modern cART. Patients attending ≥2 appointments with an HIV specialist at the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic from 2004 to 2013 were studied. A sub-analysis included psychosocial measures from annual questionnaires for Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS) participants. Median inter-visit interval and constancy (percentage of 4-month intervals with ≥1 visit) were calculated by patient. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models identified factors associated with inter-visit interval length and intervals ≥12 months. 1591 patients were included. 615 patients completed an OCS questionnaire and were more likely to be older white MSM from Canada with a viral load (VL) <50 copies/ml. The median (IQR) of patients’ median inter-visit intervals was 3.15 (2.78, 3.84) months and median (IQR) constancy was 90% (71%, 100%). Two percent of inter-visit intervals were ≥12 months and 25% of patients had ≥1 interval ≥12 months. Longer inter-visit intervals were associated with younger age, white race, earlier calendar year, longer duration of HIV, VL < 50 copies/mL and higher CD4 counts. Patients who were younger, white, had injection drug use as a risk factor, had a longer duration of HIV, and had VL ≥50 copies/mL were more likely to have an inter-visit interval ≥12 months. In the OCS sub-analysis including psychosocial variables, lower levels of depression were associated with longer inter-visit intervals. Retention at this tertiary care centre was high. Efforts to maximize attendance should focus on younger patients and those with substance abuse issues. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background:HIV-infected adults have increased fracture risk. Objectives:To generate pilot data comparing bone density, structure, and strength between HIV-infected adults with and without a prior fracture. Methods:Adults with and without a prior fracture after their HIV diagnosis were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, race, and smoking history. Participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), trabecular bone score (TBS), hip structural analyses (HSA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), high-resolution peripheral quantitative tomography (HR-pQCT) and measurement of bone turnover markers. Results were compared between cases and controls, with differences expressed as percentages of control group values. Results:23 pairs were included. On DXA, cases had lower areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the total hip (median difference in T-score −0.25,p = 0.04), but not the lumbar spine (median difference in T-score 0.10,p = 0.68). Cases had greater abnormalities in HSA and most HR-pQCT and HSA measures, by up to 15%. VFA revealed two subclinical fractures among cases but none among controls. TBS, CTX, and P1NP levels were similar between groups, with differences of 1.9% (p = 0.90), 9.7% (p = 0.55), and 10.0% (p = 0.24), respectively. For each parameter, we report the median and interquartile range for the absolute and relative difference between cases and controls, the correlation between cases and controls, and our recruitment rates, to inform the design of future studies. Conclusions:These pilot data suggest potential differences in bone structure, estimated bone strength, and asymptomatic vertebral fractures among HIV-infected adults with and without fracture, warranting further study as markers of fracture risk in HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]