Search

In this study we analyzed two models commonly used in remote sensing-based root-zone soil moisture (SM) estimations: one utilizing the exponential decaying function and the other derived from the principle of maximum entropy (POME). We used both models to deduce root-zone (0–100 cm) SM conditions at 11 sites located in the southeastern USA for the period 2012–2017 and evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each approach against ground observations. The results indicate that, temporally, at shallow depths (10 cm), both models performed similarly, with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.89 (POME) and 0.88 (exponential). However, with increasing depths, the models start to deviate: at 50 cm the POME resulted in r of 0.93 while the exponential filter (EF) model had r of 0.58. Similar trends were observed for unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE) and bias. Vertical profile analysis suggests that, overall, the POME model had nearly 30% less ubRMSE compared to the EF model, indicating that the POME model was relatively better able to distribute the moisture content through the soil column. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to large footprints of remotely sensed microwave brightness temperatures, accuracy of microwave observations in areas of large surface heterogeneity has always been a technological challenge. Microwave observations in areas dominated by waterbodies typically exhibit observed brightness temperature several tens of kelvins lower than areas having no surface water. The non-linearity between brightness temperature and other geophysical quantities such as soil moisture makes the accuracy of microwave observations a critical element for accurate estimation of these quantities. In retrieving soil moisture estimates, an error of 1 K in remotely sensed microwave brightness temperatures results in about 0.5–1% error in volumetric soil moisture. Large uncertainties in the observed brightness temperatures make such observations unusable in areas of large brightness temperature contrast. In this article, we discuss a deconvolution method to improve accuracy using the overlap in the adjacent microwave observations. We have shown that the method results in improved accuracy of 40% in brightness temperature estimation in regions of high brightness temperature contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]