Search

Abstract Background Purpose Method Results Conclusion Patients with extensive left hemisphere damage frequently have ideational apraxia (IA) and transcortical sensory aphasia (TSA). Difficulty with action coordination, phonological processing, and complex motor planning may not be indicative of higher-order motor programming or higher-order complex formation. We report on the effects of IA and TSA on the visual and motor skill of stroke patients.The study aims to address the question of whether IA and TSA in bilingual individuals are the results of an error of motor function alone or due to a combined motor plus and cognitive dysfunction effect.Twelve bilingual patients (seven males, and five females) were diagnosed with IA and TSA, and are divided into two groups of six patients. Then, 12 healthy bilingual controls were evaluated for comparing with both groups. Bilingual aphasia testing (BAT) and appropriate behavioral evaluation were used to assess motor skills, including coordination, visual-motor testing, and phonological processing.Findings (pointing skills) show that the performance of the L1 and L2 languages are consistently significant (p < 0.001) in healthy individuals compared to the IA and TSA groups. Command skills for L1 and L2 languages were significantly higher in healthy individuals compared to IA and TSA controls (p < 0.001). Further, the orthographic skills of IA and TSA vs controls in both groups were significantly reduced (p < 0.01). Visual skills in the L1 language were significantly improved (p < 0.05) in IA and TSA patients compared to healthy controls after 2 months. Unlike orthographic skills which were improved in IA and TSA patients, languages in bilingual patients did not simultaneously improve.Dyspraxia is a condition that affects both motor and visual cognitive functions, and patients who have it often have less referred motor skills. The current dataset shows that accurate visual cognition requires both cognitive-linguistic and sensory-motor processes. Motor issues should be highlighted, and skills and functionality should be reinforced along with the significance of treatment between IA and TSA corresponding to age and education. This can be a good indicator for treating semantic disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apraxia is a higher level motor deficit that occurs when processing a goal-directed action. The apraxic deficit can manifest itself in absence of sensory input deficits or motor output deficits, neglect, frontal inertia or dementia. According to a clinical classification still largely in use, there are two main forms of limb apraxia: ideomotor (IMA) and ideational (IA), observed when a patient is required to imitate a gesture or use an object, respectively. In the present review, we examined only the cognitive treatments of both types of limb apraxia of a vascular aetiology. Despite the high prevalence of limb apraxia caused by left brain damage, and the fact that apraxia has been known for over a century, the literature regarding its rehabilitation is still very limited. This is partly due to the nature of the recovery from the deficit, and in part to the automatic-voluntary dissociation. Here we review those treatments that have proved most successful in helping patients to recover from limb apraxia. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is a progressive disorder that can be characterised by asymmetrical akinetic rigidity, involuntary movements, cortical sensory loss, alien limb syndrome and asymmetrical apraxia (Gibb et al ., 1989; Rinnie et al ., 1994). Diagnosis of praxic disabilities is thought to be essential for distinguishing CBD, in its early stage, from other akinetic-rigid syndromes. However, the nature of apraxia in CBD, and the relations between ideomotor and ideational apraxia, are not well understood. For example, if there is an ideational deficit in a given patient, does this deficit occur independently of any ideomotor disorder, or are the two impairments linked in some manner? In the present paper we report a case study of a patient with apraxia due to CBD. We examine whether the disorder is confined to production tasks, or whether there is also a related deficit in recognising the correct actions performed with objects (an ideational deficit). We also evaluate whether a disorder found for action with single objects dissociates from the ability to link multiple actions into more complex, everyday tasks. The performance of our patient showed an impairment in both action production and action recognition system, suggesting a component of ideational as well as ideomotor apraxia in CBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]